About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if there are differences in the effectiveness of decompression surgery alone versus decompression combined with extended fusion in patients with a previous lumbar spinal fusion who now present with symptoms of lumbar adjacent segment stenosis (LASS). The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does decompression alone differ from decompression combined with extended fusion with regard to clinical outcomes two years after surgery? * Are there any clinical or radiological characteristics that can predict better or worse outcomes two years after surgery? * Are there any differences between the treatment groups in terms of health economics?
Researchers will compare decompression surgery alone versus decompression combined with extended fusion to see if there are any differences in treatment effect.
Participants will:
* Be randomized to one of the two surgical procedures * Visit the clinic four times postoperatively (at three months, 1, 2 and 5 years) for checkups and tests * Respond to questionnaires before surgery, and three months, 1, 2 and 5 years postoperatively
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis, defined as neurogenic claudication or radiating pain into the lower limbs with duration >6 months
MRI-confirmed adjacent segment stenosis, proximal to a previously fused lumbar segment (fusion of maximum two levels between L1 and S1, any type of previous lumbar fixation procedure).
CT-verified solid fusion
Minimum time since previous fusion: one year
Disqualifiers
Previous surgery at the actual adjacent stenotic level.
More than two fused lumbar levels.
Non-union (pseudoarthrosis) at the previously surgically fused level, radiologically verified.
Foraminal stenosis grade 3 at the adjacent level.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Decompression alone
Procedure/SurgeryPatients allocated to decompression alone will be offered mid-line preserving decompression technique with the use of a vision-enhancing aid (microscope or magnifying glasses).
Decompression with extended fusion
Procedure/SurgeryPatients allocated to decompression with extended fusion will be offered decompression with the use of vision enhancement (microscope or magnifying glasses). The procedure for the extended fusion will involve bilateral pedicle screws with autologous bone transplant and/or bone substitutes. The use of an interbody device (cage) or not and decompression technique will be at the discretion of the surgeon. Bone grafts should be placed in the interbody device and either posteriorly and/or anteriorly to the interbody device. Autologous bone can be placed in the intervertebral space without a cage if it is not feasible e.g., due to a too narrow intervertebral disc space. Alternatively a posterior or posterolateral bone grafting can be performed.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Change in percent
Improvement in the ODI score of a minimum of 30% from baseline (dichotomized variable: yes / no (yes = improved 30% or more, no = improved less than 30%)). The ODI is a questionnaire examin the level of disability based on 10 everyday activities of daily living. Each item consists of 6 statements which are scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating the least disability and 5 the highest level of disability. The total score is calculated as a percentage, with 0% indicating no disability and 100% indicating the highest level of disability.
Secondary outcomes
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): Continuous
Change in ODI from baseline (continuous variable)
Numeric Rating Scale leg pain (NRS leg pain)
Change in NRS leg pain from baseline. The NRS is a 11-point numeric scale (patient reported) ranging from '0' (e.g. "no pain") to '10' (e.g. "worst possible pain")
Numeric Rating Scale back pain (NRS back pain)
Change in NRS back pain from baseline. The NRS is a 11-point numeric scale (patient reported) ranging from '0' (e.g. "no pain") to '10' (e.g. "worst possible pain").
Global perceived effect (GPE)
The GPE scale asks the participant to rate, on a 7 point Likert scale, how much their condition has improved or deteriorated. GPE 1-2 defined as success (completely recovered (1), much better (2)), GPE 3-5 defined as no change (somewhat better (3), no change (4), somewhat worse (5)), GPE 6-7 defined as worsening (much worse (6), worse than ever (7))
Other outcomes
Adverse Events of special interest (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Safety assessments: Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESI) and serious AE (SAEs)
Cost-effectiveness
Change in the EQ-5D-5L, hospital costs, community costs including sick leave, co-interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological).
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Oslo University Hospital
Lead sponsor
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Collaborator
University Hospital of North Norway
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: