About this trial
This study was designed to compare the effects of a prenatal education program based on the Indivisible Self Model with those of a needs-based prenatal education program on psychosocial outcomes among pregnant women.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Between December 2025 and November 2026,
Living in the province of Aksaray,
Female,
Between the ages of 18-40,
Disqualifiers
Those whose native language is not Turkish,
Those who are male,
Those under 18 years of age or over 40,
Those whose pregnancy is less than 28 weeks or more than 32 weeks,
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Prenatal Education Program Based on the Indivisible Self Model
Other interventionThe Indivisible Self Model-based prenatal education program consists of 10 face-to-face group sessions delivered over 2 days. The program is structured around the five components of the Indivisible Self Model (Primary Self, Coping Self, Social Self, Creative Self, and Physical Self) and includes an interactive theoretical presentation and a practical application session for each component. Each training day comprises five 45-minute sessions with a 15-minute break between sessions. The program is designed to promote psychosocial well-being and enhance coping skills among pregnant women.
The needs-based prenatal education program
Other interventionThe needs-based prenatal education program consists of 10 face-to-face group sessions delivered over 2 days. Developed according to the Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health's antenatal education guidelines (updated from 2024 onward), the program is tailored to participants' educational needs and covers pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, postpartum, and newborn care. Each day includes five 45-minute sessions with 15-minute breaks. The program is designed to improve participants' knowledge, skills, and preparedness for childbirth and the postpartum period.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Psychological Well-Being Scale
Participants' current levels of psychological well-being will be assessed using the "Psychological Well-Being Scale" developed by Diener et al. (2009-2010). This scale is a measurement tool developed to complement existing well-being measures and aims to assess individuals' socio-psychological well-being levels. The scale has a 7-point Likert-type response format and consists of a total of 8 items, each rated from "1 = Strongly disagree" to "7 = Strongly agree". All items consist of positive statements, and the possible scores on the scale range from 8 to 56. Higher scores indicate a higher level of psychological well-being. The internal consistency of the scale was found to be α = .87 using Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Revised Emotional Consistency Scale
Participants' levels of sense of coherence will be assessed using the Revised Emotional Coherence Scale, developed by Bachem and Maercker in 2016 to improve upon Antonovsky's original model. Based on Antonovsky's "Sense of Coherence" theory, this scale aims to assess individuals' perceptions of their life experiences as meaningful, comprehensible, and manageable. The scale uses a five-point Likert-type response format, with items rated from "1 = Not true at all" to "5 = Very true". The minimum possible score is 13, and the maximum is 65. Higher scores indicate that individuals perceive their lives as more meaningful, comprehensible, and manageable, thus indicating a higher level of emotional coherence. In the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for overall internal consistency was determined as α = 0.82. The alpha values for the sub-dimensions are α = 0.77 for significance, α = 0.77 for compr
Self-Efficacy Scale for Normal Birth
Participants' perceptions of control and support during childbirth will be assessed using the Perceived Control and Support During Childbirth Scale developed by Ford, Ayers, and Wright in 2009. The Perceived Control and Support During Childbirth Scale is a scale developed to assess women's perceptions of control and support during childbirth in the postpartum period.The scale consists of three sub-dimensions: internal control, external control, and perceived support, and contains a total of 33 items. The PCS, which has a five-point Likert scale, is rated from "1 = Strongly disagree" to "5 = Strongly agree". The minimum possible score on the scale is 33, and the maximum score is 165. Higher scores indicate that the individual felt more control and perceived more support during childbirth. In the Turkish reliability and validity study of the scale, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was reported as 0.95.
Perceived Control and Support in Childbirth Scale
Participants' self-efficacy levels will be assessed using the Self-Efficacy Scale for Normal Delivery, developed by Chu et al. in 2017. This scale is an important assessment tool, particularly for determining women's attitudes towards normal delivery and their level of self-confidence during the prenatal period. The scale consists of 9 items, each scored from 0 (no confidence at all) to 10 (very confident). Thus, the scale offers 11 different score options for each item. The total scores that can be obtained from the scale range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating a high level of self-efficacy belief in normal delivery. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was reported as 0.994 for the 2nd trimester; 0.956 for the 3rd trimester; and 0.980 for the entire scale. The Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Normal Birth was carried out by Kahraman and Alparslan in 2022.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: