The Puerto Rico Asthma Integrated Response Program ("PR-AIR")

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-12
SponsorRhode Island Hospital

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to adapt and deliver an evidence-based multi-level intervention to reduce asthma disparities, and that promote and improve population health in the high-burden communities of San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The Puerto Rico-Asthma Integrated Response Program (PR-AIR) will be implemented and evaluated to address pediatric asthma disparities in San Juan, PR, an area of high asthma burden. This study unfolds in two phases: In Phase 1, the researchers will collaborate with community stakeholders to identify needs, barriers and facilitators of PR-AIR implementation. Phase 2 consists of an evaluation of low-intensity (virtual) and high-intensity (in-person) methods of PR-AIR implementation outcomes using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework and a mixed methods approach.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Children between the ages of 2 and 12 years old

Children must reside in one of the identified catchment areas

Children must meet the screening criteria as having not well controlled or poorly controlled asthma

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • CASE in person version (High Intensity Package)

    Behavioral

    Controlling Asthma in Schools Effectively (CASE) is a multi-level school-based asthma management program delivered by a Community Health Worker (CHW) that includes 1) staff training involving education on asthma management in school, 2) child-based asthma management education with an emphasis on control of symptoms in the school setting provided in a group setting during the school day, 3) caregiver education after school involving supporting children's asthma control in the school setting, 4), and provision of an Asthma Action Plan (AAP) to the school for child enrollees.

  • CASE-V remote version (Low Intensity Package)

    Behavioral

    CASE-V, the low intensity version of CASE, includes similar child and caregiver-based asthma management education that is provided in a remote format with adaptation to integrate technological feature of Zoom. All CASE-V components (for staff, children, and parents) have been adapted to promote engagement (e.g., use of chat and polling function).

  • CASE and HARP in person (High Intensity package)

    Behavioral

    Children with "poorly controlled" asthma will receive both the CASE and HARP programs. HARP is a home-visiting program that includes individualized asthma management education and strategies and supplies for environmental remediation. All 3 visits can be conducted by a CHW. The first includes a "walk-through" to identify triggers. Asthma education and self-management strategies are provided using a structured protocol and low-literacy flip-book (English or Spanish). Referrals and advocacy are offered to address asthma management barriers (e.g., communication with landlord/housing re: code violation). The 2nd and 3rd visits include delivery of supplies (e.g., HEPA vacuum, pest gels, mattress covers), instruction for use, review of AAP, and follow-up on environmental control recommendations provided during the 1st visit.

  • CASE-V and HARP-V remote version (Low Intensity package)

    Behavioral

    HARP-V replicates the content delivered in HARP in a remote format. The first session includes a virtual "walk-through" in which the educator uses a structured script and checklist to guide the caregiver through the home and show specific components of the environment (e.g., carpeting, area under the kitchen sink, exhaust fan in bathroom) to identify asthma triggers. Asthma education and self-management strategies are provided using a structured protocol and slide overview based on the HARP flip-book. Supplies for environmental remediation are delivered prior to the 2nd visit. The 2nd and 3rd visit include instruction for use of supplies, review of AAP, and follow-up on recommendations and referrals.

Treatment groups

480 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Low-Intensity (Virtual) Intervention ImplementationActive comparator 2 interventions
Group B: High Intensity (in-Person) Intervention ImplementationActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Child Asthma Control (Individual Level, ages 2-4 years)

Effectiveness of the intervention on child-level asthma control is measured using the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK). The TRACK is a 5-item measure assessing asthma symptoms and control in young children by caregiver report. Items assessing frequency of various asthma-related events (e.g., breathing problems, quick-relief medication use, etc.) are rated on a Likert-type scale from Not at all (scored 20) to Extremely (scored 0). Scores \< 80 suggest child's asthma is not well controlled.

Time frame
Asthma Control will be measured at baseline, End of Treatment (EOT; 1 - 2 months after baseline, depending on intervention assignment), and every 3 months for 1 year.
2

Change in Child Asthma Control (Individual Level, ages 5-11 years)

Effectiveness of the intervention on child-level asthma control is measured using the Childhood Asthma Control Test (cACT). Children answer 4 questions on a 0-3 scale, and caregivers answer 3 questions on a 0-5 scale related to the frequency child's asthma symptoms in the previous 4 weeks. Lower scores indicate worse symptoms. Scores of 19 or less suggest asthma is not well controlled.

Time frame
Asthma Control will be measured at baseline, End of Treatment (EOT; 1 - 2 months after baseline, depending on intervention assignment), and every 3 months for 1 year.
3

Change in Child Asthma Control (Individual Level; ages 12 and up)

Effectiveness of the intervention on child-level asthma control is measured using the Asthma Control Test. Youth ages 12 and up complete 5-items related to their asthma on Likert-type scales ranging from 1-5, with lower scores indicating more severe symptoms. A cutoff score \<19 indicates suboptimal asthma control; scores \<=15 suggest poorly controlled asthma.

Time frame
Asthma Control will be measured at baseline, End of Treatment (EOT; 1 - 2 months after baseline, depending on intervention assignment), and every 3 months for 1 year.
4

Health Care Utilization-ED visits (Community Level)

Health care utilization will be assessed by community-level rates of Emergency Department visits of children within the targeted geographic area. Obtaining utilization rates in this way will help the researchers to assess effectiveness of the intervention on the community level.

Time frame
12 months pre- and post-intervention year

Secondary outcomes

1

Asthma-related Quality of Life (QoL) (Individual Level)

Effectiveness on child-level quality of life (QOL) will be measured by the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ). The instrument consists of 23 items related to limitation across three domains (activity limitation, symptoms and emotional function). Each item is rated 1-7 on a Likert scale, with lower numerical responses indicating greater impairment.

Time frame
Asthma-related QOL will be measured at baseline, End of Treatment (EOT; 1 - 2 months after baseline, depending on intervention assignment), and every three months for 1 year.
2

School Absences (Community Level)

Community-level school absences will be assessed by attendance data (i.e., number of school absences) from the schools in the targeted area that correspond to each "step" in the wedge of the study design.

Time frame
12 months pre- and post-intervention year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Rhode Island Hospital

Lead sponsor

University of Puerto Rico

Collaborator