About this trial
Recently, Grgic (2018) discussed the concept of responders and non-responders to caffeine supplementation highlighting the importance of the repeatability of results. However, the number of studies that have investigated this idea by repeating the same time-trial performance test multiple times with the same caffeine dose is sparse (Astorino et al., 2012; Del Coso et al., 2019). Furthermore, studies have shown that differences in the CYP1A2 genotype may account for some of the variation in time-trial performance (Guest et al., 2018). Thus, the current study aims to identify whether the effects of moderate caffeine supplementation (5 mg/kg) on time-trial performance are repeatable to aid the identification of responders and non-responders. Additionally, the study aims to determine if the CYP1A2 genotype may explain any of the variability in time-trial performance in trained male cyclists.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
To be considered for inclusion in the study, participants must be regular cyclists, between 18 and 35 years of age, capable of completing a 20 km cycling time trial at a minimum speed of 30 km/h (arbitrary inclusion criteria to ensure a sufficient standard of athlete).
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Caffeine
Dietary supplement5 mg/kg of caffeine in pill form
Placebo
Dietary supplement5 mg/kg dose of maltodextrin in pill form
Caffeine
Dietary supplement5 mg/kg dose of caffeine in pill form
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Blood lactate concentration
Description: Change from baseline in blood lactate concentration measured at rest and at six different exercise intensities (55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80% percent of maximal oxygen uptake) on an electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer
Heart rate
Change from baseline in heart rate measured at rest and at seven different exercise intensities (55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80% percent of maximal oxygen uptake) on an electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer.
Oxygen uptake
Change from baseline in oxygen uptake measured at rest and at seven different exercise intensities (55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80% percent of maximal oxygen uptake) on an electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer
Perceived exertion
Change from baseline in rating of perceived exertion measured (using the 6-20 Borg scale) at seven different exercise intensities (55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80% percent of maximal oxygen uptake) on an electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: