The Role of Knowledge Retrieval in Inference-making

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age8-14
SponsorWilliam Jewell College

About this trial

This project will (a) examine the relationship between knowledge retrieval and inferencing; (b) determine the effectiveness of an intervention that improves knowledge retrieval and inferencing among struggling readers; and (c) expand research opportunities for undergraduates. The research design uses 316 struggling readers in grades 4-6 of diverse backgrounds. The effects of knowledge retrieval (accuracy and speed) on inferencing will be modeled without dichotomizing the distribution. Linear mixed effect models will be fit to determine whether reader characteristics make unique contributions to inferencing across the posttest and follow-up data collection time points. First, several structural models will be considered as students may be nested in teachers, schools, and tutors. Unconditional models will estimate the intraclass correlation for each level of the study design. If significant interclass correlations emerge, multilevel models will be fit to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention while controlling for covariates such as pre-test performance on inference-related measures and child-attributes such as English learner status. The primary analysis plan assumes an intent-to-treat model in which the efficacy of two intact conditions will be tested. Effect sizes will be estimated to report the magnitude of difference between the two conditions. Expected outcomes include (a) the identification of a method that effectively facilitates knowledge retrieval and the application of relevant knowledge to form inferences among elementary struggling readers from diverse backgrounds; (b) the validation of an intervention that teaches struggling readers how to activate, retrieve, and interweave relevant knowledge with information in the text and accurately form inferences while reading that can be broadly implemented in general education classrooms; and (c) expansion of undergraduate research opportunities, particularly among students from diverse backgrounds who have been historically underserved.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

performance below a a standard score of 93 on the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency

Disqualifiers

clinical diagnosis of a significant cognitive impairment

clinical diagnosis of a significant behavioral disability

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Role of Knowledge Retrieval

    Behavioral

    Students will learn a new knowledge base to perfect mastery. Following the attainment of mastery students will read passages on the topic and answer questions that prompt the literal recall of key facts and the formation of inferences.

  • Inference Intervention

    Behavioral

    The intervention will pre-teach students a set of 20 essential facts about Egypt. Students will interact with expository and narrative texts. Students will practice using a text clue strategy to activate and integrate prior knowledge, will make in-text connections, connections across the 3 intervention texts, and connections between text and knowledge, and will make inferences about character motives and author intent. The tutor will ask students to justify connections and evaluate how these connections enhance understanding. Students will answer inference questions that require using text and background knowledge. A simple graphic organizer will support and scaffold inferencing. Throughout the intervention, students will practice retrieving the 20 essential facts about Egypt from memory using flash cards, completed in pairs with students providing each other feedback.

Treatment groups

316 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Variable TestExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Repeated TestExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Gates-MacGinite Reading Test-4th Edition; Change is being assessed

a standardized, group-administered, multiple-choice assessment of reading comprehension.

Time frame
pre-intervention
2

Gates-MacGinite Reading Test-4th Edition; change is being assessed

a standardized, group-administered, multiple-choice assessment of reading comprehension

Time frame
immediately after the intervention
3

Test of Language Competence-Expanded; Change is being assessed

Inference Task asks students to read three sentences and form an inference

Time frame
pre-intervention
4

Test of Language Competence-Expanded; change is being assessed

Inference Task asks students to read three sentences and form an inference

Time frame
immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

1

Knowledge Retrieval; change is being assessed

It teaches new knowledge then measures the accuracy and efficiency by which the individual can retrieve that knowledge. After learning the knowledge base, students read passages and form inferences with the accuracy and efficiency of inferencing measured.

Time frame
pre-intervention
2

Knowledge Retrieval; change is being assessed

It teaches new knowledge then measures the accuracy and efficiency by which the individual can retrieve that knowledge. After learning the knowledge base, students read passages and form inferences with the accuracy and efficiency of inferencing measured.

Time frame
Immediately after the intervention
3

Knowledge Retrieval; change is being assessed

It teaches new knowledge then measures the accuracy and efficiency by which the individual can retrieve that knowledge. After learning the knowledge base, students read passages and form inferences with the accuracy and efficiency of inferencing measured.

Time frame
one-week after the intervention
4

Knowledge Retrieval; change is being assessed

It teaches new knowledge then measures the accuracy and efficiency by which the individual can retrieve that knowledge. After learning the knowledge base, students read passages and form inferences with the accuracy and efficiency of inferencing measured.

Time frame
one-month after the intervention

Other outcomes

1

Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension

measure of silent reading fluency and understanding of text

Time frame
baseline screening of participants; pre-intervention

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.