About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of usual verbal counseling supported by a video illustration comparing to the use of usual verbal counseling alone prior to obtaining spinal fluid ( Lumbar puncture - LP ) procedure, from children suspected to have brain infection in the Emergency department settings.
This trial is trying to answer if use of video illustration is associated with higher acceptance rate for the procedure by the parents of children who are suspected to have brain infection (meningitis) in the pediatric emergency room settings at a tertiary hospital.
Who is suitable to participate? Parents/legal guardians of all children aged between 1day to 12 years, who are suspected to have brain infection (meningitis) attending the Pediatric emergency room at the Royal Hospital.
Participants will:
Be counseled using verbal snd video method = Intervention group OR verbal method only = Control group The Researchers will collect the acceptance rate in performing LP in both groups.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
All Parents/legal guardians of 0-13 years old children who were identified to get an emergent lumbar puncture procedure, as decided by the attending physician during the Emergency Department shift.
Participants who speak Arabic or English
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Audio-visual tool/ Video
Other interventionUse of Audio-visual tool (Video) during counseling session
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
The acceptance rate of the Lumbar Puncture (LP) procedure
The acceptance rate of the LP procedure, which was obtained directly from the parents/legal guardians after the counseling in Emergency Department from both groups. Physicians documented acceptance or refusal in the Hospital Information System (HIS).
Secondary outcomes
A survey for the parents prepared to get their opinion and compare their experience (between the intervention and control group)
A survey for the parents prepared to get their opinion and compare their experience (between the intervention and control group) using 4 key questions: their understanding of the procedure, perception of its safety, perception of painfulness, and overall comfort with their child undergoing lumbar puncture. Participants rated each item on a 1-10 Likert scale. The survey to be completed after admission-typically within 48 hours-through in-person interviewing the family or via phone calls.
Refusal reasons collected during interview time with parents
The reasons for LP refusal were collected prospectively from parents during the interview time and after the survey. All who refused the procedure in either group were asked to answer a closed-ended question listing reasons: lack of knowledge about LP, not being convinced of its diagnostic importance, or fear of complications. If complications were selected as a reason, they were then asked an open-ended question to specify the side effects or complications they were concerned about.
online survey with Likert scales
The Physicians' Perspectives on using an Audio-visual method for Lumbar Puncture counseling in the Emergency Department will be assessed using an online survey with 5-point Likert Agreement Scale related to their agreement level (Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, disagree, strongly disagree), their feeling, the challenges faced implementing the method in the Emergency Department and if they would recommend standardizing it for LP counseling.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.