The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorLuzerner Kantonsspital

About this trial

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has become the dominant treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization. Nonetheless, PCI with stent implantation has some limitations and especially patients with severely calcified coronary lesions (approximately 10-20% of all patients with CAD) have an elevated risk for adverse outcomes, including target lesion failure (TLF) and stent thrombosis (ST).

Several dedicated PCI devices have been developed for treatment of severely calcified lesions. Whereas especially two of them have shown promising results in smaller, prospective studies. First, the super high-pressure NC PCI balloon (OPN™ NC, SIS Medical AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) has been shown to represent an effective and safe device for lesion preparation. Second, the lately introduced Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)™ balloon catheter (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA) appears to be a safe and efficient alternative device for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. However, it remains unknown, if the OPN™ NC balloon is non-inferior to to IVL regarding lesion preparation and completeness of stent expansion in severely calcified lesions.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years and consentable;

Acute or chronic coronary artery disease with ischemia related symptoms (e.g. angina) and/or evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g. FFR/ iFR, CMR, SPECT or PET-CT);

Angiographically-proven coronary artery disease;

Lesions in non-target vessels requiring PCI may be treated either

Disqualifiers

Patient experienced an acute STEMI or cardiogenic shock related to an acute MI within 2 days prior to index procedure;

Any comorbidity or condition which may reduce compliance with this protocol, including follow-up calls/ visits (e.g. advanced dementia);

Any medical, geographic, and/or social factor making study participation impractical or precluding required follow-up.

Patient is pregnant or nursing (a negative pregnancy test is required for women of child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrollment);

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • OPN™ NCB Super High Pressure PCI Balloon

    Device

    In order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions. As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria. Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion.

  • Shockwave™ C2 IVL Catheter

    Device

    In order to permit advancement of the studied medical devices - OPN™ NCB or Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter - initial lesion preparation using small SCBs or NCBs (≤2mm) or rotablation (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States) is allowed, but will be documented. This may be required in selected cases with very calcified and tight lesions. As per protocol, lesion preparation will be performed using either the super-high pressure PCI balloon OPN™ NCB or the Shockwave™ IVL balloon catheter according to random treatment assignment after matching the angiographic and/or OCT inclusion criteria. Following successful lesion preparation all patients will be treated with a latest generation durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (Xience™ Sierra or Skypoint, Abbott Vascular Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States) to allow comparison of stent expansion.

Treatment groups

280 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Study DeviceExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control DeviceActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Final stent expansion (in percentage, %) assessed by OCT

Time frame
At index Procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Acceptable stent expansion (>80%) assessed by OCT

Time frame
At index Procedure
2

Optimal stent expansion (>90%) assessed by OCT

Time frame
At index Procedure
3

Procedural success

defined as the achievement of angiographic success (residual stenosis of \<30%, no flow-limiting dissection and/or no no-reflow) without any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which is defined as cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction, TIA/ stroke and repeat revascularization (PCI or CABG) up to 30 days

Time frame
At index Procedure
4

Strategy success

defined as procedural success using the assigned study device and stent, without requirement for lesion preparation with further devices (i.e. cross-over to the non-assigned study devices or cutting/ scoring balloons).

Time frame
At index Procedure

Other outcomes

1

Coronary perforations (Ellis grade III and/or cavity spilling)

Time frame
At index Procedure
2

Persistent periprocedural vessel occlusion/MI

Time frame
At index Procedure
3

Periprocedural ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/ VF)

Time frame
At index Procedure
4

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)

Time frame
At index Procedure

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Luzerner Kantonsspital

Lead sponsor

Hôpital Fribourgeois

Collaborator

Hamilton General Hospital

Collaborator