Therapeutic Efficacy of Monoclonal Antibody Drugs for Alzheimer's Disease Based on PET Research

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age50-85
SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

About this trial

Preliminary clinical trial results indicate that Aβ-targeting monoclonal antibody drugs can delay disease progression more effectively. However, some patients still progress slowly to the moderate stage during treatment despite maintaining low Aβ/tau pathological protein loads. For such cases, patients and their families are fully informed about the potential lack of efficacy with continued treatment, and the decision is left to their discretion. Information regarding whether treatment is continued is documented and followed up to determine whether sustained benefits can be achieved. Previous further studies on lecanemab suggest that patients with low or absent tau pathology derive more significant clinical benefits, though large-sample validation remains lacking. This project will therefore enroll patients at clinical stages 3-4 (0.5 ≤ CDR ≤ 1) and monitor those progressing to moderate AD (CDR = 2) during monoclonal antibody therapy. Using tau pathology stratification, the study aims to identify which AD patients are most suitable for monoclonal antibody treatment and evaluate whether therapy continuation yields sustained benefits in patients progressing to moderate dementia, as well as whether patient selection should integrate both pathological (a-c stage) and clinical diagnoses.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Meet the diagnostic criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's Disease or mild-to-moderate AD. [Clinical Scores: CDR Global Score = 0.5 (for MCI) or 1 (for mild AD), corresponding to clinical stages 3-4, with a positive PIB-PET scan confirming amyloid pathology]

Male or Female

Between 50 and 85 years old (inclusive)

Not currently participating in any other clinical trial or research study

Disqualifiers

Any contraindication to MRI

History of seizure within the past 6 months or refractory epilepsy.

Unstable or severe psychiatric illness within the past 6 months.

History of bleeding disorders, coagulopathy, or clinically significant coagulation abnormalities (e.g., platelet count <50,000/μL or INR >1.5).

Trial population

This study included early AD patients treated with Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Lecanemab 10 mg/kg

    Biological/Vaccine

    Lecanemab Injection Concentrate Solution (active ingredient at 100 mg/mL) is provided as a sterile aqueous solution containing 100 mg/mL of Lecanemab, 50 mmol/L citric acid, 350 mmol/L arginine/arginine hydrochloride, and 0.05% (w/v) polysorbate 80, with a pH of 5.0, and each vial is capable of being drawn into a volume of 5 mL. Lecanemab is to be administered via intravenous infusion over 60 minutes in saline solution. Lecanemab must be administered using an infusion system that includes a terminal 0.22 μM inline filter. The dosage of Lecanemab is 10 mg/kg.

  • Conventional anti-dementia treatment group

    Drug

    Conventional anti-dementia treatment: Early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients routinely take cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil for treatment.

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Lecanemab treatment group1 intervention
Group B: Conventional anti-dementia treatment1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Aβ-PET centiloid values

Statistical Comparison of Lecanemab versus Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Based on Aβ-PET Centiloid Scores

Time frame
Baseline, 18 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Change from Baseline in the CDR at 18 Months

Assessment of the Statistical Difference in CDR Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups

Time frame
Baseline, 18 months
2

Change from Baseline in the MMSE at 18 Months

Assessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in MMSE Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups

Time frame
Baseline, 18 months
3

Change from Baseline in the MoCA at 18 Months

Assessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in MoCA Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups

Time frame
Baseline, 18 months
4

Change from Baseline in the NPI at 18 Months

Assessment of the Statistically Significant Difference in NPI Scores Between Lecanemab and Conventional Anti-Dementia Treatment Groups

Time frame
Baseline, 18 months

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: