This is a Multicentre International Study Evaluating CT-based IGABT With / Without Either TRUS During BT/Pre BT MR as Per IBS-GECESTRO-ABS Recommendations for Target contouring-as an Alternative to MRIGABT for Cervical Cancer From Implementation Perspectives Under EMBRACE-III:TRIPLET IMPACT Study.

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorHomi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre

About this trial

Title: Integration of Multi-modality Imaging Protocols with Emphasis on CT in Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy (IGABT) for Cervical Cancer - EMBRACE III-TRIPLET : IMPACT Study Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) remains a major health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which account for the majority of global cases. The standard curative treatment involves a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent chemotherapy, followed by brachytherapy (BT). Brachytherapy plays a crucial role in achieving high local control by delivering radiation directly to the tumour through internally placed radioactive sources.

Historically, BT dose prescription was based on two-dimensional (2D) X-ray images and defined anatomical "points," achieving 5-year local control rates of 60-70%. Over the last decade, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MR-IGABT) has transformed practice by enabling three-dimensional (3D) target-based dose prescription and adaptation to tumour regression. The landmark EMBRACE I study, involving over 1300 patients, demonstrated over 90% 5-year local control rates with MR-IGABT, establishing it as the international gold standard endorsed by NCG, ICRU, NCCN, and ESGO-ESTRO guidelines.

However, MRI-based planning for IGABT remains logistically and financially challenging for many centres, especially in LMICs. CT and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) have emerged as feasible alternatives, offering broader accessibility. Despite encouraging outcomes from smaller institutional studies, the lack of standardized and validated target delineation concepts for CT-IGABT has led to significant variability in clinical implementation. Recognizing this, the Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and GEC-ESTRO jointly published consensus recommendations in 2020 to standardize CT-IGABT practices across diverse clinical environments.

At Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam, our prior work (RetroLACER Study) demonstrated that CT-based IGABT can achieve outcomes comparable to MR-IGABT, highlighting its feasibility and potential for wider adoption. Building on this foundation, the EMBRACE III-IMPACT Study seeks to evaluate whether CT-IGABT can be systematically and uniformly implemented in a multi-centre setting and to benchmark clinical outcomes against the standards set by MR-IGABT.

Study Design:

This is a multicentre, prospective, observational study planned to include approximately 1200 participants with locally advanced cervical cancer. All participants will receive standard-of-care treatment, including EBRT, concurrent weekly cisplatin chemotherapy, and brachytherapy with image-guided planning.

Objectives:

To assess the feasibility of implementing standardized CT-IGABT protocols across diverse clinical environments.

To evaluate local control, disease-free survival, and treatment-related toxicity outcomes for CT-IGABT.

To compare and benchmark CT-IGABT outcomes with established MR-IGABT benchmarks from prior international studies.

Participant Involvement:

Participants will undergo standard diagnostic imaging, EBRT with weekly cisplatin, and brachytherapy using CT-based planning. Imaging and treatment data will be collected, anonymized, and submitted to a central database for review. Regular follow-up visits will monitor tumour control and treatment-related side effects.

Benefits:

Participants receive internationally standardized, quality-assured treatment protocols. Centres gain access to expert review and QA support from international collaborators, potentially improving treatment quality and outcomes.

The study supports global efforts to establish CT-IGABT as a cost-effective, accessible alternative to MRI-based IGABT, expanding equitable cancer care access.

Risks:

The study is observational and involves standard treatment; therefore, risks and costs are comparable to routine cervical cancer care.

Confidentiality and Ethics:

All data will be anonymized and handled in compliance with ethical and regulatory standards. Participant confidentiality will be strictly maintained. Written informed consent will be obtained before study participation.

Significance:

By validating standardised CT-based protocols and establishing outcome benchmarks, the study aims to facilitate widespread adoption of IGABT in resource-limited settings, ultimately improving treatment accessibility and survival outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Cancer of the uterine cervix considered suitable for curative treatment with definitive chemo radiotherapy including brachytherapy.

Biopsy showing invasive squamous-cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma or adeno - squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

FIGO (2018) stage IB2 to IVA

Willingness to participate by signing informed consent form.

Disqualifiers

Other previous or current primary malignancies except carcinoma in situ of the cervix.

Metastatic Inguinal Nodes not amenable to radical radiation therapy

Metastatic disease in para-aortic region beyond renal vessels

Not eligible for concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (creatinine clearance < 50mg/ml/min)

Trial population

The study will include approximately 1200 women with histologically confirmed, locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB3-IVA) who are planned for curative chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy at the primary treating center. Participants will be recruited from multiple national and international centres equipped with CT-based brachytherapy facilities. All will undergo standardized treatment and follow-up as per study protocol, with imaging and outcome data submitted to a centralized database for quality assurance and analysis.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • CT IGABT

    Other intervention

    Participants with locally advanced cervical cancer will receive standard-of-care treatment, including external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with concurrent weekly cisplatin chemotherapy, followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT). Brachytherapy planning will utilize CT-based imaging to define target volumes and organs at risk according to international consensus guidelines. Centres with advanced imaging capabilities may integrate MRI or transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for pre-brachytherapy assessment (Cohort A), while others will use CT-only planning (Cohort B). All treatments will follow standardized protocols with centralized quality assurance and data review to evaluate feasibility, consistency, and clinical outcomes of CT-IGABT implementation across diverse clinical environments.

Treatment groups

1,200 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Cohort A - Advanced CT Environment, Cohort B - Basic CT Environment1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Local control in relation to anatomical compartments and specific BT targets (CTV- THR) and morbidity related to OAR in the pelvis.

Remission status (complete, partial, stable \& progressive disease) should be evaluated 3 - 6 months after treatment by gynaecological examination and imaging wherever applicable. Regular follow-up including gynaecological examination with planned appointments 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment to be done \& documented. In case of suspected recurrence, biopsy / fine needle aspiration cytology to confirm recurrences and appropriate imaging to be performed at the discretion of treating physician \& Institutional protocol. Physician assessed morbidity will be scored prospectively with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (both CTCAE V 5.0) on apriori selected, clinically relevant endpoints related to gastro-intestinal, genito-urinary, vaginal and several unspecific symptoms. Morbidity will be classified into early and late as per standard definition (early being within the first 90 days after completion of treatment).

Time frame
36 & 60 Months

Secondary outcomes

1

Regional control

Remission status (complete, partial, stable \& progressive disease) should be evaluated 3 - 6 months after treatment by gynaecological examination and imaging wherever applicable. Regular follow-up including gynaecological examination with planned appointments 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment to be done \& documented. In case of suspected recurrence, biopsy / fine needle aspiration cytology to confirm recurrences and appropriate imaging to be performed at the discretion of treating physician \& Institutional protocol.

Time frame
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months
2

Progression free survival

Remission status (complete, partial, stable \& progressive disease) should be evaluated 3 - 6 months after treatment by gynaecological examination and imaging wherever applicable. Regular follow-up including gynaecological examination with planned appointments 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment to be done \& documented. In case of suspected recurrence, biopsy / fine needle aspiration cytology to confirm recurrences and appropriate imaging to be performed at the discretion of treating physician \& Institutional protocol.

Time frame
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months
3

Overall survival

Remission status (complete, partial, stable \& progressive disease) should be evaluated 3 - 6 months after treatment by gynaecological examination and imaging wherever applicable. Regular follow-up including gynaecological examination with planned appointments 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment to be done \& documented. In case of suspected recurrence, biopsy / fine needle aspiration cytology to confirm recurrences and appropriate imaging to be performed at the discretion of treating physician \& Institutional protocol.

Time frame
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months
4

Morbidity

Physician assessed morbidity will be scored prospectively with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (both CTCAE V 5.0) on apriori selected, clinically relevant endpoints related to gastro-intestinal, genito-urinary, vaginal and several unspecific symptoms. Morbidity will be classified into early and late as per standard definition (early being within the first 90 days after completion of treatment).

Time frame
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital & Research Centre

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: