Timing of Soft Tissue Grafting Following Immediate Implant Placement

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20+
SponsorUniversity Ghent

About this trial

Patients undergoing single immediate implant placement (IIP) in the premaxilla will be invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Prior to surgery, a small- field low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is taken to verify the integrity of the facial bone wall and an adequate amount of apical and palatal bone availability for implant anchorage.

In all of the patients, a connective tissue graft (CTG) will be harvested and inserted into the buccal mucosa to increase soft tissue thickness around the immediately installed implant. However, included patients will be randomly allocated to either receive the CTG immediately after implant installation (Immediate soft tissue grafting, ISG = control group) or 3 months after implant installation (Delayed soft tissue grafting, DSG = test group).

Forty sealed envelopes are prepared for that purpose, of which 20 are internally labeled as "DSG" and 20 as "ISG". Following IIP, a sealed envelope will be opened to reveal the treatment concept In both groups, a cutting implant is installed in an optimal 3D position. Socket grafting is performed with deproteinized bovine bone mineral to limit buccal bone resorption and to optimize soft tissue stability.

In the ISG group, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures onto the buccal mucosa. Finally, a healing abutment is installed, which is replaced by a provisional implant crown 2 days later.

In the DSG group, implant placement, socket grafting and installation of a provisional implant crown occur as described above. In contrast, a buccal pouch is performed 3 months after implant installation. Graft harvesting, adaptation and fixation are performed as described above.

A small-field low-dose CBCT is taken at the 1-year and 5-year follow-up in order to measure buccal bone resorption as compared to the baseline dimensions in designated software.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

At least 20 years old

Good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary et al. 1972)

Presence of an incisor, cuspid or premolar in the maxilla that needs to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present

At least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveolus as assessed on CBCT to ensure primary implant stability

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy

Systemic diseases

Smoking

Suppuration

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Soft tissue grafting

    Procedure/Surgery

    A pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany) onto the buccal mucosa.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Immediate soft tissue graftingActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Delayed soft tissue graftingExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Buccal bone resorption (mm)

Changes in buccal bone dimension as measured on superimposed CBCT slides

Time frame
1-, 5-year

Secondary outcomes

1

Changes in buccal soft tissue profile (mm)

Changes in buccal soft tissue profile as measured on superimposed digital surface models. An intra-oral scan is taken prior to implant surgery and at 1- and 5- year follow up. On the obtained digital models, an area of interest (AOI) at the buccal aspect was drawn for each site. The AOI extends from 0.5 mm below the soft tissue margin to 4 mm more apical. In mesio-distal dimension, the AOI reaches from the mesial to the distal line angle. The AOI may vary between sites because of individual anatomic differences but must be kept constant in each site across time points. A volumetric change (mm3) was calculated by designated software within the AOI and divided by the AOI surface (mm2). This results in the mean change in buccal soft tissue profile (mm).

Time frame
1-, 5-year
2

Changes in midfacial soft tissue level (mm)

Changes in buccal mucosal margin position as measured on superimposed digital surface models

Time frame
1-, 5-year
3

Pink Esthetic Score

Pink Esthetic score as defined by Fürhauser et al., 2005. Within this scale, 7 variables are evaluated ( mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft-tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color and texture) using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value, the maximum achievable PES was 14. A 0 relates to the least esthetic result, while a 14 relates to a perfect outcome for all parameters.

Time frame
1-year
4

Mucosal Scarring Index

Mucosal Scarring Index as defined by Wessels et al., 2019. Within this scale, 5 parameters are assessed (width, height/contour, color, suture marks, and overall appearance) using a 0-1-2 scoring system. The MSI score may range from 0 (no scar) to 10 (most extreme scar).

Time frame
1-year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.