Total Knee Arthroplasty With Personalized Implantation: Computer Navigation-Assisted Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorGroupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon

About this trial

Title: Personalized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Computer-Assisted Navigation vs. Robotic Assistance (CAN-ARD).

Summary:

Knee osteoarthritis is frequently treated with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). However, approximately 20% of patients remain dissatisfied following the procedure. This study aims to compare two surgical assistance technologies designed to improve prosthetic placement accuracy: Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN) and Robotic-Arm Assistance (RA).

The primary objective is to determine if there is a significant difference in functional outcomes and the "forgotten joint" sensation (measured by the Forgotten Joint Score - FJS) between patients operated on with robotic assistance versus those with traditional navigation at 3, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. The study's hypothesis is that there is no major clinical difference between these two techniques when applied within a personalized alignment strategy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient providing written informed consent according to regulatory requirements

Male or female patients aged ≥18 years

Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

Use of Attune® prosthesis with posterior cruciate ligament retention (CR) and patellar resurfacing

Disqualifiers

History of ligament reconstruction

Previous fracture or bone surgery (osteotomy) of the ipsilateral femur or tibia (except hip or ankle surgery)

Preoperative knee stiffness with flexion contracture >15° or flexion <90°

Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery (RA)

    Device

    Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a robotic-arm-assisted system connected to navigation software. Like the navigation group, this arm utilizes the personalized alignment strategy and the Attune® CR prosthesis. Instead of manual cutting guides, the surgeon manipulates a robotic arm equipped with a motorized saw to perform the bone cuts according to the pre-planned digital model. This technology is intended to increase the precision of bone resections.

  • Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN)

    Device

    Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed using an intraoperative computer navigation system. The procedure follows a personalized alignment strategy (restricted kinematic alignment combined with joint stability). After creating a digital model of the knee and mapping anatomical landmarks, the navigation system assists the surgeon in manually positioning the bone cutting guides. The primary implant used is the Attune® CR (Cruciate-Retaining) prosthesis with patellar resurfacing.

Treatment groups

140 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: RoboticExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: NavigationActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Forgotten Joint Score (FJS).

Assessment of the patient's ability to forget the artificial joint in daily life. Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 100. A higher score indicates a better outcome (the patient is less aware of the prosthetic joint)

Time frame
3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

1

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

Evaluation of the patient's opinion about their knee and associated problems. Minimum score: 0, Maximum score: 100. A higher score represents a better outcome.

Time frame
3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
2

Self Knee Value (SKV).

Patient's subjective assessment of their knee as a percentage of a normal knee. Scale: 0% to 100%. A higher percentage represents a better outcome.

Time frame
3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
3

Net Promoter Score (NPS)

A single-question survey used to measure patient satisfaction and their willingness to recommend the surgical procedure to others. The score is calculated based on responses to a single question on a scale of 0 to 10 (where 0 is "not at all likely" and 10 is "extremely likely"). Respondents are grouped as Promoters (9-10), Passives (7-8), or Detractors (0-6). The final NPS is calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters, resulting in a score ranging from -100 to +100. A higher score indicates higher patient satisfaction

Time frame
3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
4

Active Range of Motion.

Measurement of the active flexibility (extension and flexion) of the operated knee using a goniometer. Measured in degrees

Time frame
Preoperatively, and at 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.