About this trial
The objective of this trial is to assess efficacy and compliance of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the upper airway dilator muscles in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (TESLA) who do not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy over a period of 3-months in the community and compare results against usual care (ongoing CPAP therapy), evaluate acceptability, comfort and adverse events, and record outcomes for provision of the health economics analysis. The proposed study will provide us with data about the efficacy of the domiciliary use of the intervention from a UK-based prospective, multi-centre and randomised controlled trial (Phase III). We will understand whether the primary outcome parameter, the apnoea hypopnea index (AHI), or the secondary outcomes (e.g. 4% oxygen desaturation index (ODI), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), compliance and comfort, Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaires (FOSQ), European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D)) are suitable measures to assess control of OSA using TESLA within reasonable acceptance for the patients to provide the analysis of healthcare resource usage for assessment of cost-efficacy and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Responder analysis will provide insights into gender, socio-economic background and endotypes to predict who most suitably benefits from this treatment.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adult participants (≥18 years) who have OSA with an AHI between 5-40 events/hour, as measured by the baseline sleep study (3 nights off CPAP).
If the participant fails to use CPAP sufficiently, defined as use of CPAP for less than 4 hours/night on fewer than 70% of nights over a minimum period of 3 months prior to enrolment.
Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-32.0 kg/m2 (inclusive)
Adults without significant anatomical obstruction in the upper airway (e.g., normal sized tonsils).
Disqualifiers
Hypercapnic patients (pCO2>6.0 kPa) or those with other features of obesity hypoventilation syndrome (elevated bicarbonate, HCO3- >28mmol/L).
Adults with significantly enlarged tonsils (size 3-4)
Adults with polyps or adenoids, hypoglossal nerve palsy,
Adults with notable medical co-morbidities that could potentially impact participation in or the achievement of the study's objectives (e.g., significant heart failure (New York Heart Association, NYHA class III-IV), recent myocardial infarction (within 3 months) and significant cardiac arrhythmias, uncontrolled hypertension).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
ZeusOSA
DeviceTranscutaneous electrical stimulation in sleep apnoea (TESLA) in the submittal area, provided by the ZeusSleep device when asleep.
CPAP
DeviceContinous positive airway pressure (CPAP) when asleep
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI)
Number of respiratory events per hour measured by home-based sleep study.
Secondary outcomes
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Daytime sleepiness measured using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (score range 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater sleepiness).
EQ-5D Index Score
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D descriptive system (index score 0-1).
EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Self-rated health measured using the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (0-100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health).
Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10) Score
Sleep-related functional status measured using the FOSQ-10, with higher scores indicating better functional outcomes.
Other outcomes
SHER15 criteria defining responders to treatment
Reduction of AHI of more than 50% to below 15 events per hour, or normal (below 5 per hour);
SHER20 criteria defining responders to treatment
Reduction of AHI of more than 50% to below 20 events per hour, or normal (below 5 per hour);
Gender-related response
Responder rate according to gender (male vs female responders, percentage)
Cost-Effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness of ZeusOSA compared to usual care (ongoing CPAP) in patients with low CPAP adherence, expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). ICERs are a composite measure which will be derived from: proportion of responders, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and healthcare resource use/cost data.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Zeus Sleep Ltd
Lead sponsor
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborator
King's College London
Collaborator
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborator
Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborator
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Collaborator
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Collaborator
AintreeNHSTrust
Collaborator
University of Southampton
Collaborator
Royal Papworth Hospital
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: