Treatment of ADHD Using High and Low Frequency Paired Associative Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorBen-Gurion University of the Negev

About this trial

This study investigates the effects of high and low-frequency paired associative deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) on adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The study aims to explore whether targeting the prefrontal cortex with paired stimulation can improve symptoms of ADHD by balancing cortical arousal between the brain hemispheres. A total of 90 participants with ADHD will be recruited. Participants with ADHD will undergo three weeks of daily TMS treatment, while participants who receive a sham treatment will be included for baseline comparisons. The study will measure electrophysiological, cognitive, and clinical outcomes using a variety of assessments, including EEG, cognitive tests, and CAARS to evaluate the treatment's efficacy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Men and women aged 21-65.

Aligned with the diagnosis of ADHD according to the criteria of the DSM-5.

Participants taking medication for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder will be asked, starting one week before the start of the treatment until the end, to take Ritalin IR 10mg (provided that the taking of the medication will be done at least 8 hours before the start of the treatment or at least one hour after it. This instruction is also valid for taking the medication on the days of the follow-up sessions (4 and 8 weeks from the end of the daily treatment phase). Ritalin is given as the only option because a drug with a short half-life is needed. The dose can be increased up to 20 mg per dose). The choice of this drug is to ensure that changes in brain function/activity are not the result of the Ritalin medication but of the research intervention.

Give their written and oral consent to participate in the study.

Disqualifiers

Additional active psychiatric disorders in Axis I of the DSM-5.

Antipsychotic treatment, antidepressants, or mood stabilizers.

History of intolerance to TMS.

Diagnosis of severe personality disorder according to the DSM-5.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Paired Associative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

    Device

    Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain. By placing a coil on the scalp, TMS generates magnetic pulses that induce electrical currents in specific brain regions. This can alter brain activity and potentially influence behavior and symptoms of various neurological and psychiatric conditions. PAS involves the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at a low and high frequency to stimulate the prefrontal cortex at different areas of the brain. The goal is to assess its effects on cortical arousal and ADHD symptoms. Participants will receive daily sessions of this stimulation for three weeks, with the stimulation designed to influence brain activity and potentially alleviate symptoms of ADHD.

Treatment groups

90 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Low-Frequency Active PAS Treatment (ADHD Patients)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: High-Frequency Active PAS Treatment (ADHD Patients)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Low-Frequency Sham PAS Treatment (ADHD Patients)Placebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in ADHD Symptoms Assessed by the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS)

This measure evaluates the change in ADHD symptom severity using the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS), a standardized and validated assessment tool. The CAARS provides subscale scores (e.g., Inattention, Hyperactivity-Impulsivity, ADHD Index) on a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Change will be assessed by comparing scores obtained at baseline (pre-treatment) and following the intervention (post-treatment), as well as at 1-month and 2-month follow-up visits.

Time frame
Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment assessments at the end of the 3-week treatment phase, with follow-up assessments at 1 month and 2 months after treatment to evaluate sustained symptom improvement.
2

Change in Cognitive Control Assessed by Stroop Task Performance

This measure assesses changes in participants' cognitive control by comparing pre-treatment and post-treatment performance on the Stroop Task. Performance is evaluated based on reaction time (milliseconds) and accuracy (% correct responses) in congruent and incongruent trials. Lower reaction times and higher accuracy typically indicate better cognitive control, but outcome-neutral interpretation will be used to assess change.

Time frame
Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (immediately after the 3-week treatment phase). Additional assessments may be conducted during follow-up sessions at 1 month and 2 months after treatment.
3

Change in Working Memory Assessed by N-back Task Performance

This measure evaluates working memory by comparing participants' pre-treatment and post-treatment performance on the N-back task (2-back condition). Performance is quantified by reaction time (milliseconds) and accuracy (% correct target detections). Lower reaction times and higher accuracy reflect stronger working memory performance, but results will be analyzed in a directionally neutral manner.

Time frame
Pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (immediately after the 3-week treatment phase). Additional assessments may be conducted during follow-up sessions at 1 month and 2 months after treatment.
4

Change in EEG Power Spectral Density Across Frequency Bands

This outcome assesses changes in EEG power spectral density (PSD) in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz) frequency bands during resting-state EEG. PSD will be calculated using Fourier-based spectral analysis and reported in microvolts squared per hertz (µV²/Hz) at frontal and motor cortex sites.

Time frame
Baseline (pre/post Session 1), end of treatment (pre/post Session 15), and at 1-month and 2-month follow-ups. EEG is recorded during rest, cognitive tasks, TMS, TEP, and post-treatment rest at each time point.

Secondary outcomes

1

Long-Term Change in ADHD Symptoms Assessed at Follow-Up by Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS)

This outcome assesses the persistence of treatment-related changes in ADHD symptoms using the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS). The CAARS includes multiple subscale scores (e.g., Inattention, Hyperactivity-Impulsivity) ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Scores will be compared between post-treatment and follow-up time points to evaluate sustained changes. Unit of Measure: CAARS Subscale Score (0-100).

Time frame
Assessed during follow-up sessions at 1 month and 2 months after the end of the 3-week treatment phase to evaluate the persistence of treatment effects.
2

Long-Term Change in Cognitive Control Assessed at Follow-Up by Stroop Task Performance

This outcome evaluates long-term effects of TMS on cognitive control using the Stroop Task. Performance will be measured by reaction time (milliseconds) and accuracy (% correct responses) during congruent and incongruent trials. Comparisons will be made between post-treatment and follow-up time points to assess sustained changes in executive function. Unit of Measure: Milliseconds (reaction time), Percent correct (% accuracy).

Time frame
Assessed during follow-up sessions at 1 month and 2 months after the end of the 3-week treatment phase to evaluate the persistence of treatment effects.
3

Long-Term Change in Working Memory Assessed at Follow-Up by N-back Task Performance

This outcome evaluates the persistence of treatment-related changes in working memory using the 2-back condition of the N-back Task. Performance will be assessed based on reaction time (milliseconds) and accuracy (% correct target detections). Results from post-treatment and follow-up assessments will be compared. Unit of Measure: Milliseconds (reaction time), Percent correct (% accuracy).

Time frame
Assessed during follow-up sessions at 1 month and 2 months after the end of the 3-week treatment phase to evaluate the persistence of treatment effects.
4

Change in Amplitude of TMS-Evoked Potential (TEP) Components

This outcome assesses the amplitude of specific TMS-evoked potential (TEP) components (e.g., P30, N45, N100) extracted from EEG data recorded during TMS stimulation sessions. These components reflect cortical excitability and inhibition. Unit of Measure: Microvolts (µV).

Time frame
Baseline (pre/post Session 1), end of treatment (pre/post Session 15), and at 1-month and 2-month follow-ups. EEG is recorded during rest, cognitive tasks, TMS, TEP, and post-treatment rest at each time point.

Other outcomes

1

Incidence of Adverse Events Reported During and After TMS Treatment

Adverse events (AEs) will be monitored and documented throughout the TMS intervention and follow-up periods. AEs will be identified using a structured adverse event reporting form completed by study staff during each session and follow-up. Events will be categorized by severity (mild, moderate, severe) and by relation to the intervention (definitely, possibly, or not related). Each participant's number and type of AEs will be recorded. Unit of Measure: Number of adverse events per participant.

Time frame
Monitored throughout the 3-week treatment, with documentation of any adverse effects during each treatment session. Follow-up assessments at 1 month and 2 months post-treatment will monitor for any delayed side effects or long-term tolerability issues.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Lead sponsor

Soroka University Medical Center

Collaborator