Trial Evaluating the Rate of Pneumothorax in Severe Emphysema Secondary to Endoscopic Volume Reduction With Two-stage ZEPHYR® Valves Versus Endoscopic Volume Reduction With One-stage ZEPHYR® Valves

ConditionCOPD
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age35-80
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Limoges

About this trial

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects 3.5 million people and is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Emphysema involves air retention in the lungs and is ultimately responsible for a major deterioration in the quality of life. Available drug treatments have moderate efficacy whereas surgical lung volume reduction can improve exercise capacity when offered to a very selected population but at the cost of significant morbidity and mortality.

Endoscopic Lung Volume reduction with ZEPHYR® valves improves respiratory function at rest, exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with little or no interlobar collateral ventilation.

If this technique has therefore proven its effectiveness, it is not devoid of complications and is notably responsible for pneumothorax in 27% of cases. The management of this complication is clearly codified, ranging from patient monitoring to the removal of one or more valves. It is therefore a subject of major concern for multiple reasons: high incidence, lengthening of hospital stay, increase in the overall cost of care, potential loss of benefit for the patient in the event of permanent withdrawal. valves and above all a potentially fatal event.

A new strategy for implanting ZEPHYR® valves in two stages has been developed in Limoges University Hospital. This innovative algorithm has been evaluated in several non-comparative single or multicenter studies. In those studies, pneumothorax' rate secondary to lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves is rated between 4.5 and 12%. The efficacy of the treatment appears to be comparable with the data found in the trials evaluating in which the entire lobe was treated in one procedure. Moreover, despite two procedures, there does not seem to be any increased risk of occurrence of other complications. Finally, the systematic scheduling of a thoracic computed tomography between the two procedures showed that 26.6% of patients presented a reduction in volume greater than 350mL despite incomplete treatment.

These data seem promising but no direct comparison with standard one-step treatment has ever been conducted so far.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 35 years old and ≤ 80 years old at the time of signing the consent

Emphysema (homogeneous or heterogeneous) on a recent CT scan (< 6 months). Heterogeneous emphysema defined by a difference of at least 15% destruction (threshold 910HU) between two adjacent lobes.

Destruction ≥ 50% (threshold 910 HU) of the target lobe on the chest scanner

Smoking quit for 3 months

Disqualifiers

Asthma considered as main diagnosis

Recurrent exacerbations: (>3 over the last year or 2 requiring hospitalization)

Myocardial infarction or stroke in the 6 months prior to inclusion

Symptoms of heart failure in the 6 months prior to inclusion

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 2 stages

    Procedure/Surgery

    After the selection process, they will all be hospitalized in order to undergo an endoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valve under general anesthesia. In the experimental group, patients will be treated according to Limoges' treatment algorithm (2 stages)

  • Endoscopic lung volume reduction in 1 stage

    Procedure/Surgery

    After the selection process, they will all be hospitalized in order to undergo an endoscopic lung volume reduction with Zephyr® valve under general anesthesia. In the control group, the entire lobe will be treated during one procedure

Treatment groups

244 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: two-stage ZEPHYR® valvesExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: one-stage ZEPHYR® valvesSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pneumothorax rate

Proportion of patients suffering from at least one pneumothorax rate between the beginning and the first 45 days following the end of lung volume reduction with ZEPHYR® valves

Time frame
45 day

Secondary outcomes

1

Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) measurement

Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of FEV1 in liter

Time frame
0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month
2

Force Vital Expiratory (FVE) measurement

Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of FVE in Liter

Time frame
0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month
3

Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) measurement

Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of FRC in Liter

Time frame
0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month
4

Inspiratory Capacity (IC) measurement

Functional parameters at rest (plethysmography) - assessment of IC in Liter

Time frame
0 Day, 45 Day, 6 month and 12 month

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.