About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the safety and clinical benefit of pulsed electric field(PEF) treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients with acquired resistance to anti programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) monoclonal antibody therapy.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Safety of PEF treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients. * Control of ablated and other targeted lesions. * Local and peripheral immunoregulation effect. PEF energy will be delivered to preselected lesions of participants, then anti PD-1 will be routinely administrated if no adverse event(AE)/serious adverse event(SAE) which need medical intervention occurs.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients over 22 years old with pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer stage III-IV.
Patients received first-line anti PD-1 immunotherapy and had disease progression.
Lesions to be ablated must be ≤ 3cm in longest diameter(LD).
More than one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 except PEF targeted lesions.
Disqualifiers
Patients should be excluded if they received surgery within 30 days.
Patients should be excluded if they received any form of local treatment within 30 days.
Accompanied by uncontrolled metastasis of the central nervous system.
Have a history of severe adverse reactions to ICI.
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
PEF
DevicePEF device treated in the trial.
Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody
DrugAnti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody administered on Day 7 then routinely.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Technical success rate of PEF treatment
The percentage of the number that the equipment successfully reached the target lesion and completed PEF energy delivery.
Incidence of PEF treatment related AE/SAEs
The incidence and severity of PEF treatment related adverse events according to CTCAE version 4.0
Secondary outcomes
Local control of ablated lesions by CT
Compared with the baseline CT scan before treatment, the maximum diameter of the ablated lesion decreased, remained unchanged or increased by less than 20%.
Local control of ablated lesions by CT
Compared with the baseline CT scan before treatment, the maximum diameter of the ablated lesion decreased, remained unchanged or increased by less than 20%.
Progression free survival rate at 6 months
Overall survival rate at 6 months
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.