Trial to Assess Non-inferiority of an Orbital Atherectomy Only Versus a Calcium-tailored Debulking Approach

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorIHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung

About this trial

Some patients with coronary artery disease have severely calcified vessels. In these cases, placing a stent - a small tube that helps keep the artery open - can be very difficult. Calcium build-up in the artery wall may prevent the stent from expanding properly, increasing the risk of complications or failure of the treatment.

To prepare these vessels before stenting, doctors use special techniques to modify or remove the calcium. These techniques are known as plaque modification strategies and can include devices such as atherectomy systems, scoring balloons, or intravascular lithotripsy. However, there is no clear standard as to which strategy is best.

Purpose of the Study:

This study compares two different approaches to treating calcified coronary arteries before stenting:

* A uniform approach using only the orbital atherectomy system (Diamondback 360®, Abbott), which sands away the calcium with a rotating crown * A tailored approach, where the operator chooses from various available methods (e.g., rotational atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloons, or shockwave therapy) based on the patient's specific type of calcium The goal is to determine whether the uniform orbital atherectomy approach is not worse (non-inferior) than the individualized method when it comes to how well the stent expands inside the artery.

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups.

Randomization ensures fair comparison between both groups. The decision to implant a stent and to use additional techniques is at the discretion of the interventional cardiologist.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 Years

Chronic coronary syndrome with a clinical indication for percutaneous coronary intervention of a severely calcified lesion as defined by coronary computer tomography (CT; Agatston Score of target lesion ≥453 OR Calcium Arc >270°). The determination of calcification in the target lesion is based on native and contrast enhanced CT scans that are conducted as per clinical guidelines. The CT images must not be older than 6 months at the time of patient enrollment.

Signed informed consent

The patient is an appropriate candidate for bypass surgery, angioplasty, or atherectomy therapy

Disqualifiers

Acute ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (STE-ACS) within 48 hours

Cardiogenic shock

Chronic total occlusion of the target lesion

Glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Debulging approach using the orbital atherectomy system

    Device

    A uniform approach using only the orbital atherectomy system (Diamondback 360®), which sands away the calcium with a rotating crown

  • Debulging using rotational atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloons, or shockwave therapy

    Procedure/Surgery

    A tailored approach, where the operator chooses from various available methods based on the patient's specific type of calcium

Treatment groups

310 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Debulging with the orbital atherectomy system (Diamondback 360®)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Debulging with various available methodsActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Post-procedural Minimal Stent Area (MSA %) as assessed by optical coherence to-mography (OCT) imaging

Time frame
MSA will be assessed in the final OCT run performed after stent implantation withine baseline

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.