Truness of Full Arch Impressions in All on x Cases

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexMale
Age55-65
SponsorOctober 6 University

About this trial

This study aims to compare the trueness and precision of three impression methodologies photogrammetry, digital intraoral scanning with splinted scan bodies, and conventional open tray impressions in the context of the All-on-X treatment concept. This will provide valuable evidence for clinicians considering digital workflows for implant-supported prostheses. Does the use of photogrammetry and digital impression techniques with splinted scan bodies result in improved accuracy in implant position transfer in the All-on-X concept compared to conventional open tray impressions?

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults aged 45-65 years.

Fully edentulous or partially edentulous maxilla requiring full-arch rehabilitation.

Sufficient maxillary bone volume to support at least four implants according to the All-on-X protocol.

Systemically healthy patients with no contraindications to dental implant surgery (ASA I-II classification).

Disqualifiers

Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, immunosuppressive disorders)

History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region

Active periodontal disease or untreated caries

Maxillary cysts, tumors, or pathologies

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • photogrammetry based full arch impression

    Device

    use of photogrammetry system to capture the positions of All on X implants digitally without physical impression material. This technique aims to achieve precise measurements and increase patient satisfaction

  • Digital Impression Using Splinted Scan Bodies

    Device

    Digital full-arch impression using splinted scan bodies connected with resin to enhance stability. An intraoral scanner captures the splinted assembly for framework fabrication. Accuracy and patient satisfaction will be evaluated.

  • Conventional Open-Tray Implant Impression

    Procedure/Surgery

    Traditional full-arch open-tray impression using polyether or VPS material with splinted impression copings. This serves as the standard comparator for evaluating accuracy and patient satisfaction.

Treatment groups

11 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: photogrammetry based full-arch impressionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Digital impression using splinted scan bodiesExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: conventional open tray implant impressionActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Accuracy measured using 3D inspection software (Geomagic Control X).

Time frame
Immediately after measurements taking

Secondary outcomes

1

Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), assessed using standardized questionnaires.

Time frame
immediately after measurements taking

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.