Two Different Videolaryngoscopes Were Used İn The Pediatric Patient Group
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age2-10
SponsorSamsun University
About this trial
Modern alternatives to traditional laryngoscopes utilize fiber optic or digital technology to project images from the tip of the laryngoscope onto an eyepiece or monitor for improved visualization by the practitioner. Videolaryngoscopes have become an integral part of routine clinical practice and training programs, and a preferred option after failed DL (directional visualization). This study will compare two different videolaryngoscopes in pediatric participants.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
ASA I-II
10-40 kg
2-10 years old
Elective surgery
Disqualifiers
Difficult airway on preoperative assessment
Need for rapid serial intubation
History of previous difficult intubation
Cervical instability
Trial population
pediatric participant
Trial design
Design model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
In this group, intubation will be performed using a Endolarenx brand videolaryngoscope
DeviceIn this group, intubation will be performed using a Endolarenx brand videolaryngoscope
In this group, intubation will be performed using a Besdata brand videolaryngoscope
DeviceIn this group, intubation will be performed using a Besdata brand videolaryngoscope
Treatment groups
60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: group E1 intervention
Group B: Grup B1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
intubation time
The time elapsed from the passage of the laryngoscope blade through the teeth to the detection of end-tidal CO₂.
Time frame
2 minutes after inductionSecondary outcomes
1
PeDiAC Score
Determining the difficulty level of pediatric videolaryngoscopy intubation.
Time frame
1 hour2
Cormack-Lehane glottic view scale
The Cormack-Lehane glottic view classification describes laryngeal visualization during direct laryngoscopy: Grade I indicates a full view of the glottis, Grade II a partial view of the glottis, Grade III visualization of the epiglottis only, and Grade IV visualization of neither the glottis nor the epiglottis.
Time frame
1 hour3
Successful intubation attempt
The attempt is considered successful if tracheal intubation is achieved and unsuccessful if intubation fails. Recorded during airway management
Time frame
1 hourSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov