UltraSound Guided Distal Radial Artery vS Conventional Transradial Access for Interventional Coronary Angiography
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital of Patras
About this trial
Comparative study of ultrasound-guided distal radial access versus conventional radial access regarding the incidence of vascular access crossover.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Indication for Invasive coronary angiography
Disqualifiers
STEMI
Renal replacement therapy patients
Serious dermal or bone deformity of the radiocarpal joint
Shock
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
coronary angiography
Procedure/SurgeryDiagnostic and if indicated percutaneus coronary intervention during coronary angiography
Treatment groups
1,400 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: ultrasound guided distal radial arteryActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: ultrasound guided conventional transradial acessActive comparator 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
crossover
Need for a different access to begin the procedure other than the one specified in the patient's arm
Time frame
Periprocedural.Up to 5 mins will be allowed before giving up on designated method to obtain accessSecondary outcomes
1
Arterial vasospasm
Time frame
periprocedural2
hemostasis
Time from procedure's end until removal of hemostatic device
Time frame
Will be checked at set intervals of 30-60-90-180 mins post procedure3
Time until pci
Time from first needle puncture until pci (percutaneous coronary intervention) has been completed (If needed)
Time frame
periprocedural4
radial artery occlusion
ultrasound evaluation of radial artery patency after end of hemostasis
Time frame
30 days post procedureSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov