Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency Added to Perineural Steroid Injection Versus Perineural Steroid Injection Alone in the Treatment of Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorAssiut University

About this trial

Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is an entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the posterior tibial nerve at the ankle, resulting in pain, numbness, and tingling sensations in the heel and sole of the foot. Perineural steroid injections under ultrasound guidance are commonly used for conservative management to decrease inflammation and relieve pressure. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a minimally invasive neuromodulatory technique that delivers electrical pulses to alter pain transmission and promote tissue healing without damaging the nerve structure.

The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial is to determine whether combining ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency with perineural steroid injection provides superior pain relief, improved foot function, and higher patient satisfaction compared to perineural steroid injection alone in patients with mild-to-moderate tarsal tunnel syndrome.

A total of 50 adult participants will be randomly allocated to one of two study groups:

* Group A (Active PRF + Steroid Injection): Participants receive ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency applied adjacent to the posterior tibial nerve for 8 minutes (480 seconds), followed immediately by a perineural injection of 10 mL solution containing triamcinolone acetonide, dextrose 5%, and lidocaine 1%. * Group B (Sham PRF + Steroid Injection): Participants undergo identical ultrasound-guided needle positioning and sensory/motor stimulation testing, followed by 8 minutes of sham radiofrequency (generator switched off), and then receive the identical 10 mL perineural steroid injection.

Participants will be evaluated prior to the procedure and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention to assess pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale), foot function and disability (Foot Function Index), global impression of recovery, and any procedure-related side effects or complications.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years old.

Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS).

Abnormal electrophysiological study confirming mild-to-moderate TTS.

Pain or paresthesia in the posterior tibial nerve distribution persisting for more than 6 months and refractory to conservative therapy (e.g., vitamin B complex, NSAIDs, oral steroids, or night splints).

Disqualifiers

Severe TTS (defined by abductor hallucis muscle atrophy, distal motor latency > 6.5 ms, or absent potentials on electrophysiological testing).

Prior ankle or tarsal tunnel injection within the preceding 3 months.

Secondary tarsal tunnel syndrome due to systemic diseases (e.g., endocrine disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, or psoriatic arthritis).

Concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids or antihistamines.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency and Perineural Steroid

    Procedure/Surgery

    Under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 22-gauge, 54-mm radiofrequency cannula with a 5-mm active tip is placed adjacent to the posterior tibial nerve. Sensory (50 Hz, ≤0.5 V) and motor (2 Hz, \>0.5 V) stimulation are confirmed, followed by active pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) delivery (parameters: 42°C maximum tip temperature, 45 V, 2 Hz, 20 ms pulse width, for 480 seconds delivered as two consecutive 240-second cycles). Immediately following PRF, a 10 mL solution (8 mL dextrose 5%, 1 mL triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg, and 1 mL lidocaine 1%) is injected through the same cannula around the nerve (5 mL superficial and 5 mL deep).

  • Ultrasound-Guided Perineural Steroid Injection with Sham Radiofrequency

    Procedure/Surgery

    Under real-time ultrasound guidance, the cannula is positioned adjacent to the posterior tibial nerve using the identical technique, followed by identical sensory and motor stimulation testing. The cannula is maintained in place for 480 seconds with the radiofrequency generator switched off (sham PRF). Immediately following the sham phase, the identical 10 mL solution (8 mL dextrose 5%, 1 mL triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg, and 1 mL lidocaine 1%) is injected around the nerve (5 mL superficial and 5 mL deep).

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Group A: Pulsed Radiofrequency Plus Steroid InjectionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Group B: Sham Radiofrequency Plus Steroid InjectionSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change from Baseline in Pain Severity on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 Months

Pain intensity is assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain imaginable" (higher scores indicate worse pain). The change in foot and heel pain and paresthesia from baseline to 6 months post-intervention will be evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: