Upper and Lower Extremity Exercise and Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Knee Osteoarthritis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age45-90
SponsorUniversity of Texas, El Paso

About this trial

The objective of the study is to explore the effects of arm exercise (UE, arm ergometer) vs. leg exercise (LE, cycling ergometer) on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH), central pain mechanisms and knee pain in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Furthermore, we will explore relations of socioeconomic status, racial discrimination, acculturative stress, and autonomic function to exercise effects on EIH, central pain mechanisms, and knee pain. This will be a pilot randomized cross-over study where all participants undergo Day 1 (baseline assessments), Day 2 (UE or LE), and Day 3 (UE or LE).

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

age ≥45

activity-related knee pain

either no morning joint-related stiffness or stiffness that lasts ≤ 30 minutes.

knee pain at least 4 on a 0-10 pain scale

Disqualifiers

peripheral neuropathy or other sensation loss on the body sites for pain measurements (i.e., the wrist, knee, the forearm)

use of medical devices electrically active (e.g., pacemaker)

chronic use of opioids

pregnant women

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Exercise

    Other intervention

    Arm exercise will be an arm ergometer for 20 minutes, preceded by a 5-minute warm-up. Leg exercise will be a cycling ergometer for 20 minutes, preceded by a 5-minute warm-up. The exercise intensity will be set at 70% of the heart rate reserve (HRR) for each type of exercise.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ExerciseExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Lower Body ExerciseActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Changes in pressure pain thresholds (Measure of exercise-induced hypoalgesia)

Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) will be assessed at the wrist and patella. PPT being assessed at a remote body site (e.g., wrist) is to measure central pain sensitivity while PPT being assessed at the location of pain (i.e., knee, patellae) is to assess peripheral pain sensitivity with or without central pain sensitivity. PPT will be assessed using a handheld pressure algometer with 1 cm2 rubber tip. PPT will be defined as the point at which the participant verbally indicated that the pressure first changed to slight pain. A lower PPT value (Kgf) represents greater pain sensitivity. PPT will be assessed 3 times at each location and averaged. Furthermore, changes in PPT after exercise has been used to assess the degree of exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH). When PPT values increase after the exercise, it indicates a reduction of pain sensitivity and, therefore, an effect of EIH.

Time frame
Day 1: PPT will be assessed twice. PPT assessment --> 25 minutes of waiting --> PPT assessment; Time frame of Days 2 and 3 will be the same except 25 minutes of waiting time. It will be 25 minutes of exercise (either AE or LE) on Days 2 and 3
2

Mechanical temporal summation

Temporal summation (TS) is a sensitive measurement of central pain sensitivity. Investigators will assess TS using a standard set of weighted probes from 64-512 mN. Participants will rate the pain experienced by each successive weighted probe being touched on the skin of the wrist until a pain rating of ≥ 4/10 is achieved. The selected probe will be then applied at a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 seconds on the wrist. Participants will provide a pain rating at the completion of the train of 10 stimulations and 15 seconds post-stimulation. TS will be defined as the difference between the highest post-stimulation pain rating and the initial pain rating. A post-stimulation pain rating greater than the initial pain rating will be considered to be reflective of an increase in central pain sensitivity.

Time frame
Day 1: TS will be assessed twice. TS assessment --> 25 minutes of waiting --> TS assessment; Time frame of Days 2 and 3 will be the same except 25 minutes of waiting time. It will be 25 minutes of exercise (either AE or LE) on Days 2 and 3
3

Conditioned pain modulation

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) evaluates the adequacy of the descending pain modulatory pathways, which contributes to central pain sensitivity. Investigators will assess CPM using PPT as the test stimulus (PPT1) at the wrist as described above, with forearm ischemia using a blood pressure cuff as the conditioning stimulus. Briefly, the blood pressure cuff applied to the contralateral arm will be inflated to 10mm Hg above systolic pressure. The participant will be then instructed to perform hand grip squeezes until pain of at least 4/10 occurs in the contralateral arm. PPT will be then reassessed at the wrist 3 times and averaged (PPT2). Percent efficiency of CPM (%CPM) was computed as PPT2/PPT1, multiplied by 100; %CPM ≤ 100 indicates inefficient CPM.

Time frame
Day 1: CPM will be assessed twice. CPM assessment --> 25 minutes of waiting --> CPM assessment; Time frame of Days 2 and 3 will be the same except 25 minutes of waiting time. It will be 25 minutes of exercise (either AE or LE) on Days 2 and 3
4

Knee pain

We will assess changes in knee pain with a 20 meter walk using a 0-10 numeric rating scale where 0 indicates no knee pain and 10 indicates the worst knee pain.

Time frame
Day 1: knee pain will be assessed twice. Knee pain assessment --> 25 minutes of waiting --> knee pain assessment; Time frame of Days 2 and 3 will be the same except 25 minutes of waiting time. It will be 25 minutes of exercise (either AE or LE) on Days 2

Secondary outcomes

1

Racial discrimination

Racial discrimination will be assessed with the Perceived Experiences of Discrimination Questionnaire-Community Version (PEDQ-CV). This is a reliable and valid 17-item survey that assesses experiences of racialized discrimination.

Time frame
Day 1 after obtaining the informed consent form
2

Acculturative Stress

Acculturative stress will be assessed with The Social, Attitudinal, Familial, Environment Acculturative Stress Scale (SAFE). SAFE is composed of 24 items that measure stress as a result of the acculturation process in four contexts: social, attitudinal, familial and environmental acculturative.

Time frame
Day 1 after obtaining the informed consent form
3

Autonomic function

Heart rate variability (HRV), a measurement of autonomic function, will be assessed using a wearable and wireless heart rate monitor. Investigators will have participants lie supine for 5 minutes to collect heart rate variability parameters such as high frequency and high-frequency/low-frequency ratio.

Time frame
Day 1 after obtaining the informed consent form
4

The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

WOMAC knee pain scale ranges 0-20 with 5 questions assessing knee pain in different contexts such as knee pain during walking and pain during standing. Each question has a score of 0-4. A greater WOMAC score represents greater knee pain.

Time frame
Day 1 after obtaining the informed consent form

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.