About this trial
The primary aim of the study is to compare stone free rates following ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) using a sheathless approach (low power laser settings) or using a flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath (FANS) with either low power or high power laser settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of sheathless- and FANS assisted URS lithotripsy in terms of operative time, laser time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Following the primary comparison between sheathless and FANS groups, another aim is to compare the outcome of low power and high power URS lithotripsy in the FANS patients with respect to operative time, SFR, laser time, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for URS lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Akershus University Hospital and The Hospital of Vestfold - all renal stone centres in Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using one of three alternative ureteroscopic approaches: Group 1: Sheathless URS using low power TFL 4 -10 Watts, short pulse mode, Group 2: URS with FANS using low power TFL 4 - 10 Watts, short pulse mode or Group 3: URS with FANS using high power TFL 16 - 24 Watts, short pulse mode. The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic. Results and data for the three randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital, Akershus University Hospital and The Hospital of Vestfold
Disqualifiers
Concomitant ureteral stone
Urinary diversion
Active infection
Untreated cancer in the upper urinary tract
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Sheathless URS
Procedure/SurgerySheathless URS using low laser power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 10 or 20Hz, or 0.6 - 0.8J at 10Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.4J/10Hz (4W)
FANS, low power
Procedure/SurgerySheathless URS using low laser power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 10 or 20Hz, or 0.6 - 0.8J at 10Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.6J/10Hz (6W)
FANS, high power
Procedure/SurgeryURS with FANS using high laser power (16-24W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 40Hz, 0.6J at 30 - 40Hz, or 0.8J at 20 - 30Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.4J/40Hz (16W)
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Stone free rate
Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically
Secondary outcomes
Operative time
Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the endoscope until emptying the bladder in the end
Laser activation patterns: active laser time
Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in minutes
Intraoperative complications
Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)
Postoperative complications
Complications occurred after the endoscopic procedure (up to 3 months post endoscopically)
Other outcomes
Operative time, FANS low power vs FANS high power
Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the cystoscope until emptying the bladder in the end
Stone free rate, FANS low power vs FANS high power
Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically
Laser activation patterns: active laser time, FANS low power vs FANS high power
Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in minutes
Intraoperative complications, FANS low power vs FANS high power
Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Haukeland University Hospital
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
Collaborator
The Hospital of Vestfold
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: