Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Renal Stones Using a Sheathless Approach or Using a Flexible and Navigable Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS)

ConditionRenal Stones
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorHaukeland University Hospital

About this trial

The primary aim of the study is to compare stone free rates following ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) using a sheathless approach (low power laser settings) or using a flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath (FANS) with either low power or high power laser settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of sheathless- and FANS assisted URS lithotripsy in terms of operative time, laser time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Following the primary comparison between sheathless and FANS groups, another aim is to compare the outcome of low power and high power URS lithotripsy in the FANS patients with respect to operative time, SFR, laser time, intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for URS lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Akershus University Hospital and The Hospital of Vestfold - all renal stone centres in Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using one of three alternative ureteroscopic approaches: Group 1: Sheathless URS using low power TFL 4 -10 Watts, short pulse mode, Group 2: URS with FANS using low power TFL 4 - 10 Watts, short pulse mode or Group 3: URS with FANS using high power TFL 16 - 24 Watts, short pulse mode. The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic. Results and data for the three randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients ≥ 18 years scheduled for URS lithotripsy for renal stones, 8-25 mm, at the day surgery unit at Haukeland University Hospital, Akershus University Hospital and The Hospital of Vestfold

Disqualifiers

Concomitant ureteral stone

Urinary diversion

Active infection

Untreated cancer in the upper urinary tract

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Sheathless URS

    Procedure/Surgery

    Sheathless URS using low laser power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 10 or 20Hz, or 0.6 - 0.8J at 10Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.4J/10Hz (4W)

  • FANS, low power

    Procedure/Surgery

    Sheathless URS using low laser power (4-6W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 10 or 20Hz, or 0.6 - 0.8J at 10Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.6J/10Hz (6W)

  • FANS, high power

    Procedure/Surgery

    URS with FANS using high laser power (16-24W), short pulse: 0.4 - 0.5J at 40Hz, 0.6J at 30 - 40Hz, or 0.8J at 20 - 30Hz. Standard start-up settings: 0.4J/40Hz (16W)

Treatment groups

225 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Group 1 - Sheathless URS, low powerExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Group 2 - FANS, low powerExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Group 3 - FANS, high powerExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Stone free rate

Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically

Time frame
3 months post endoscopically

Secondary outcomes

1

Operative time

Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the endoscope until emptying the bladder in the end

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
2

Laser activation patterns: active laser time

Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in minutes

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
3

Intraoperative complications

Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
4

Postoperative complications

Complications occurred after the endoscopic procedure (up to 3 months post endoscopically)

Time frame
After surgery until 3 months post endoscopically

Other outcomes

1

Operative time, FANS low power vs FANS high power

Surgical time in minutes, counted from start of the procedure with insertion of the cystoscope until emptying the bladder in the end

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
2

Stone free rate, FANS low power vs FANS high power

Assessment of stone free status (or the presence of residual fragments) on low dose CT 3 months post endoscopically

Time frame
3 months post endoscopically
3

Laser activation patterns: active laser time, FANS low power vs FANS high power

Duration of laser activation periods during laser lithotripsy in minutes

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery
4

Intraoperative complications, FANS low power vs FANS high power

Complications occurred during the endoscopic procedure (bleeding, perforation, avulsion, mucosal abrasion, blurred vision)

Time frame
During surgery (approximately 1 hour), registered immediately after surgery

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Haukeland University Hospital

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Akershus

Collaborator

The Hospital of Vestfold

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: