Using Ecological Momentary Data to Inform a Web Intervention for Romantic Partners Concerned About Their Loved Ones' Drinking

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Florida

About this trial

Aim 1. Couples (N=50 dyads) with a Concerned Partner (CP) and a Drinking Partner (DP) will independently complete baseline and follow-up surveys and a 21-day EMA with three daily reports on their communication and DP's drinking. Aim 2. Iteratively develop a four-session web based intervention and evaluate the WBI's feasibility and acceptability with 15 CPs. Aim 3. Perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing WBI to psychoeducation control in 110 couples.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

be at least 18 years old

be in a romantic relationship with their partner

be living with their partner,

have a computer, tablet, or mobile phone with Internet access

Disqualifiers

drinking scores at or above the threshold for DP participation

be at least 18 years old

misuses alcohol as defined by their scores (4+ for women/non-gender confirming, 5+ for men) on the consumption portion of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT-C) (Dawson et al., 2005)

has a computer, tablet, or mobile phone with Internet access

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Web-based intervention for concerned partners

    Behavioral

    The web-based intervention will comprise sessions focusing on community reinforcement and family therapy principles including: (1) self-care, (2) positive communication including ways to increase responsiveness to their partner (PPR; i.e., actively listening, showing understanding, expressing interest in what their partner is thinking and feeling, and trying to see where their partner is coming from), (3) understanding their partner's drinking reinforcers, and (4) supporting their partner if they want help and engaging in positive, healthy activities with their partner.

  • Psychoeducation control

    Behavioral

    This is a psychoeducation control condition.

Treatment groups

160 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Psychoeducation controlOther 1 intervention
Group B: Experimental web-based interventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

CP Depression Symptoms Questionnaire

Patient Health Questionnaire. 8 items. Scores range from 0-32. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.
2

CP Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire

Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. 7 items. Higher scores indicate more anxiety symptoms.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.
3

CP Anger expression questionnaire

Dimensions of Anger Reactions - 5 item (DAR-5). Scores range 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater anger.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.
4

CP Loneliness Questionnaire

Measure: UCLA 3-item Loneliness Scale (Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., \& Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574) Scores are 1-9. Higher scores indicate more loneliness.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.

Secondary outcomes

1

CP-DP Communication Questionnaire

Family Environment via the Brief Family Relationship Scale. Fok, C. C., Allen, J., Henry, D., \& People Awakening Team (2014). The brief family relationship scale: a brief measure of the relationship dimension in family functioning. Assessment, 21(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111425856. Cohesion, expressiveness, and conflict subscales. Items are averaged. For each subscale, greater scores reflect greater cohesion, expressiveness, and constructive ways of handling conflict.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.
2

CP-DP Perceived Partner Responsiveness Questionnaire

Measures perceived partner responsiveness. Scores range from 1-5. Greater scores mean greater responsiveness perceived about the partner. Source articles: Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., \& Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1238 O'Neill, A.S., Mohr, C.D., Bodner, T., \& Hammer, L. (2020). Perceived Partner Responsiveness, Sleep and Pain: A Dyadic Study of Military-Connected Couples. Health Psychology, 39(12), 1089-1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001035

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.
3

CP Communication about Drinking Questionnaire

We have created a measure adapted from the Spouse Behavior Questionnaire (Love et al., 1991) and the Partner Management Strategies Questionnaire (Rodriguez et al., 2013) that will assess different behaviors CPs use to attempt to change their partner's drinking. Subscales include punishing drinking, rewarding sobriety, withdrawing, and supporting drinking. Items are averaged. Higher scores mean greater endorsement of these subscales.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.
4

CP-DP Communication: Number of conflicts

We will ask participants the number of disagreements they have had with their partner. Higher numbers denote more disagreements.

Time frame
1 month post-intervention.

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Florida

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Collaborator

Stanford University

Collaborator

Portland State University

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: