About this trial
Endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), is considered the main method for the treatment of symptomatic truncal vein reflux. However, there are controversial data concerning their efficacy and safety in ablating large saphenous veins because of high risk of heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), incomplete ablation and recanalization.1-5 The use of vacuum evacuation of the remaining intraluminal blood during endovenous laser ablation allows to decrease the risk of intraoperative (carbonization and destruction of the fiber lens) and postoperative complications (EHIT, hyperpigmentation, "string" feeling) and leads to reduction of recovery because of short period of vein resorption. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovenous thermal ablation with or without vacuum evacuation for the treatment of incompetent large saphenous veins (\>15 mm).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age over 18 years
Varicose veins of the lower extremities with clinical class C2-C6 with a diameter of the GSV or SSV ≥ 15 mm in a standing position
Informed consent
Disqualifiers
pregnancy or lactation
malignant neoplasms
inability or unwillingness of any patient to wear compression stockings
hypersensitivity to lidocaine
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Procedure: EVLA
Procedure/SurgeryGreat or small saphenous vein occlusion with endovenous laser ablation using ELVeS Radial 2ring fiber
Procedure: VALA
Procedure/SurgeryGreat or small saphenous vein occlusion with endovenous laser ablation using ELVeS Radial 2ring Pro fiber
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Occlusion of the treated GSV/SSV
Obliteration of varicose vein along the treated segment of the GSV/SSV measured using ultrasound (US) examination
Secondary outcomes
Pain score and use of painkillers
A questionnaire including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain is filled in by the patient. It is a numeric scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Clinical status
CEAP classification. The CEAP classification is a common descriptive platform for the reporting of diagnostic information in chronic venous disease, as well as a tool for regular patient documentation and management. The clinical component indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points). The etiologic component denotes the venous disease as congenital, primary, or secondary in nature. The anatomic classification pinpoints the veins involved as superficial, deep, or perforating. The pathophysiologic classification identifies the presence of reflux in the superficial,communicating, or deep systems, as well as the existence of outflow obstruction.
Severity of chronic venous diseases
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). The VCSS includes 9 hallmarks of venous disease, each scored on a severity scale from 0 to 3.
Health related quality of life
A questionnaire Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ 20) is filled in by the patient. The CIVIQ comprises 20 questions in four quality-of-life domains: physical, psychological, social, and pain.The result ranges from 0 to 100.
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.