About this trial
The primary objective of the study is to assess the performance of the French version of the Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Syndrome Scale (CCASS) as a screening test for cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome.
The primary endpoint will be the sensitivity of version 1A of the French scale. The result will be considered positive if the patient fails at least one of the scale's subtests. The diagnosis of a cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome will be made on the basis of a pathological score in the executive, language, visuospatial or psychoaffective domains of the neuropsychological evaluation (gold standard).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
French speaking
Acquired lesion or predominantly degenerative cerebellar pathology of any etiology
Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme
Written informed consent
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Syndrome Scale
Diagnostic testThe CCASS will be administered by a neuropsychologist starting with version 1A. An alternative version (1B, 1C or 1D) will also be administered. An interval of approximately 30 minutes should be observed between the two administrations. In order to assess the inter-rater reliability of the scale, a second neuropsychologist will be present in the room and will independently evaluate (i.e., blind to his/her colleague's rating) patient's responses. The choice of alternative version (i.e., 1B, 1C, or 1D) will be randomized.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Sensitivity of the 1A French version of the cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome scale
Secondary outcomes
Specificity of the 1A French version of the cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome scale
Sensitivity and specificity of the 1B, 1C and 1D French versions of the cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome scale
Sensitivity and specificity measured on the different versions of CCASS when a positive result is defined by ≥ 2 or ≥ 3 failed subtests respectively.
Concordance between the total raw score of version 1A and the total raw score of versions 1B, 1C, 1D, evaluated graphically using the Bland and Altman method
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.