Valve Hemodynamic Optimization Based on Doppler-Echocardiography vs Catheterization Measurements Following ViV TAVR

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

About this trial

Data on valve performance following ViV-TAVR has usually been obtained with the use of Doppler-echocardiography. However, some reports have shown significant discordances in the evaluation of mean transvalvular gradient between echocardiography and catheterization, with an overestimation of the real gradient with echo (vs. cath) in most cases. Thus, the incidence of procedural-device failure may be lower than that reported in the ViV-TAVR literature,

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure defined as severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation approved for a valve-in-valve procedure by the Heart Team

Surgical stented bioprosthetic valve (label size ≤25 mm)

TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve

Disqualifiers

Stentless or sutureless surgical valves

Trifecta bioprosthesis

Hancock II bioprosthesis

High-risk of coronary obstruction (defined either as a virtual transcatheter valve - coronary distance as evaluated by CT <4 mm or based on the criterion of the heart team responsible for the procedure).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Doppler-echocardiography

    Procedure/Surgery

    The TAVR (valve-in-valve) procedure will be performed with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with valve sizing according to current manufacturer recommendations. Following valve implantation, further intervention will be based on Doppler-echocardiographic measurements. Balloon post-dilation with a non-compliant balloon will be performed in the presence of a residual mean gradient ≥20 mmHg as assessed by Doppler-echocardiography.

  • Invasive hemodynamic measurements

    Procedure/Surgery

    The TAVR (valve-in-valve) procedure will be performed with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with valve sizing according to current manufacturer recommendations. Following valve implantation, further interventions will be based on invasive hemodynamic measurements (with simultaneous aortic and ventricular pressure recording). Balloon post-dilation will be performed with a non-compliant balloon in the presence of a mean residual gradient ≥20 mmHg as assessed by hemodynamic measurements.

Treatment groups

310 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Doppler-echocardiographyOther 1 intervention
Group B: Invasive hemodynamic measurementsOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Changes in Quality of life (Efficacy)

Change in quality of life as evaluated by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). All score are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale (lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life).The KCCQ is a 7 domains questionnaire; symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy.

Time frame
12 months follow-up
2

Periprocedural complications (Safety)

Periprocedural complications including in-hospital mortality, stroke, annular rupture, coronary obstruction, new-onset left bundle branch block, need for permanent pacemaker implantation and conversion to open heart surgery.

Time frame
Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes

1

Residual transvalvular gradient

Residual (maximal and mean) transvalvular gradient

Time frame
1 month and 12 months follow-up
2

Combined enpoint: Moderate or severe prothesis-patient mismatch and/or moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (valve performance)

Moderate or severe prothesis-patient mismatch (defines as an index aortic valve area 0.85-0.66 cm2/m2 (moderate), ≤0.65 cm2/m2 (severe) for patient with BMI ˂30km/m2 and 0.70-0.56 cm2/m2 (moderate), ≤0.55 cm2/m2 (severe) for patient with BMI ≥30km/m2 and/or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (VARC-3 definition).

Time frame
1 month and 12 months follow-up
3

Heart failure

Evaluated by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification

Time frame
1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years
4

Exercise capacity

Exercise capacity as evaluated by the six-minute wlak test.

Time frame
1 month and 12 months follow-up

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.