Video Versus Face-to-face Preoperative Anaesthetic Assessment
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorRigshospitalet, Denmark
About this trial
Randomized clinical trial rewieving difference between anaesthetic preassessment in physical consultations vs. video consultations.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
ENT and TMJ patients
Adults > 18 years
Informed consent obtained after a consideration period of minimum 24 hours
Disqualifiers
If a patient is assessed unsuitable for the video technology in example, patients with severe mental challenges (dementia, retardation, etc.), they will not be included in the trial. If excluded, the patient receives standard care, face-to-face preoperative anaesthetic assessment.
Local protocol screen patients
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Video consultation
Other interventionPreanaesthetic videoconsultation
Treatment groups
2,260 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Video consultationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Physical consultationNo intervention 0 interventions
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
SAE
All-cause mortality, all-cause admission to intensive care unit, bleeding requiring transfusion, infection requiring antibiotics, hospital readmission or prolonged hospitalization.
Time frame
30 day follow upLocations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
RigshospitaletRecruiting2200, Copenhagen, Region Sjælland
Denmark
DenmarkSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov