About this trial
Fever in infants younger than 3 months is a common reason for emergency department visits and is associated with a significant risk of serious bacterial infections. Because it is difficult to distinguish bacterial from viral infections at presentation, management is often aggressive and includes invasive procedures, hospitalization, and empiric antibiotic therapy.
Despite advances in molecular diagnostics, the etiology of fever remains unidentified in a substantial proportion of cases. This study aims to assess the presence of pathogenic viruses in respiratory and intestinal samples from febrile infants younger than 3 months compared with afebrile controls, and to explore associations with clinical, biological, environmental, and socio-economic factors
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age < 3 months
Fever ≥38°C confirmed in pediatric emergency department
Age < 3 months
Children requiring general anesthesia or managed in the pediatric emergency department, or during hospitalization or consultation, for a non-infectious condition requiring venipuncture
Disqualifiers
Lack of parental/legal guardian consent
Lack of affiliation with a social security scheme
Antibiotic treatment within 8 days prior to inclusion
Lack of parental/legal guardian consent
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
biological samples
Biological/VaccineNasal cavity swab (multiplex RT-PCR respiratory viral panel) Stool sample or peri-anal swab Blood sampling (700 µL EDTA + capillary drop for MxA testing) Biomarker analysis (CRP, PCT, MxA, CD169, CD14, CD64, HLA-DR)
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Rate of detection of pathogenic viruses in nasal cavity samples
Proportion of infants with at least one pathogenic virus detected by multiplex RT-PCR in nasal cavity samples.
Secondary outcomes
Comparison of viral detection rates between febrile infants and controls
Viruses known to be pathogenic include: RSV, Influenza A, Influenza B, COVID-19, Parainfluenza virus (types 1, 2, 3, and 4), Rhinovirus, Coronavirus 229, Coronavirus NL63, Coronavirus OC43, Enterovirus, Adenovirus, Bocavirus, Metapneumovirus
Comparison of viruses associated with fever in infants under 3 months of age according to the final diagnosis (viral-origin fever vs bacterial-origin fever) in nasal swabs and stool samples and/or perianal swabs
Final clinical diagnosis categories: * Confirmed bacterial infection: Identification of a bacterial pathogen in a normally sterile site (by culture, antigen testing, or PCR). * Probable bacterial infection: No pathogen identified in a sterile site, but clinical evidence supporting bacterial infection (signs of sepsis or localized infection) and/or elevated bacterial biomarkers (CRP \> 20 mg/L, PCT \> 0.5 ng/L), with favorable response to antibiotic therapy. * Probable viral infection: No virus identified and no evidence supporting bacterial infection. * Confirmed viral infection: Identification of at least one pathogenic virus, with compatible clinical manifestations and no evidence supporting bacterial infection.
Analysis of biological markers of inflammation
Inflammatory markers analyzed include: CRP, PCT, MxA, plasma CD14, and cellular markers (CD169, CD14, CD64, HLA-DR)
Correlation between the presence and number of pathogenic viruses and environmental and socioeconomic factors.
Environmental factors: Living environment, number of rooms in the household, and number of people living in the home. Socioeconomic factors: Daycare attendance, number of siblings, and parents' occupations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: