Virtual McKenzie Exercises and Centralization of Pain: A Pilot Study

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorEvidence In Motion

About this trial

Low back pain (LBP) is frequently managed in physical therapy using the McKenzie method, in which a patient's directional preference-most commonly extension-is used to guide treatment. Extension-based interventions are associated with symptom improvement and centralization in many individuals with LBP. At the same time, research in pain neuroscience has shown that people with LBP may have altered cortical representations of the low back, which may contribute to pain and disability. For patients who experience high pain levels or significant fear of movement, active directional preference exercises may be difficult to perform.

Motor imagery, the mental simulation of movement without physical execution, has been shown to activate brain regions involved in movement and may help modify altered cortical representations. Preliminary research has suggested that virtual or imagery-based McKenzie extension exercises may improve pain and movement-related outcomes.

This exploratory study aims to evaluate the immediate effects of a brief motor imagery-based extension protocol in adults with LBP who demonstrate a directional preference for extension. The study will assess changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, lumbar flexion, straight leg raise, pain distribution, and symptom centralization following a single motor imagery session.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Motor Imagery-Based Lumbar Extension

    Behavioral

    Participants will lie prone with hands positioned under the shoulders in a standard "pre-press-up" position. With eyes closed, participants will be verbally guided through ten imagined lumbar extension press-ups. The standardized motor imagery script includes: Focusing attention on current back and leg symptoms Imagining pushing the arms into extension Visualizing the back arching into extension Holding the imagined end-range position for several seconds Imagining returning to the starting position in a controlled manner Repeating this process ten times Total duration of the protocol is approximately 5 minutes. Mode of Delivery: In-person, guided by a physical therapist trained in the study protocol. Purpose: To evaluate immediate changes in pain, disability, psychological measures, physical mobility, neurodynamic measures, and symptom centralization following a motor imagery-based extension intervention.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Motor Imagery Extension ProtocolExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Low Back Pain Intensity (NPRS - Low Back)

Change in self-reported low back pain intensity measured using the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.

Time frame
Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).
2

Leg Pain Intensity (NPRS - Leg)

Change in self-reported leg pain intensity using the 0-10 NPRS.

Time frame
Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention (same session).

Secondary outcomes

1

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Change in disability level measured by the 10-item ODI questionnaire. Scores range from 0-50, multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage (0-100%), with higher scores indicating greater disability.

Time frame
Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention.
2

Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) - Physical Activity Subscale

Change in fear-avoidance beliefs related to work. The 7-item FABQ-W yields scores from 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater work-related fear-avoidance.

Time frame
Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention.
3

Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)

Change in pain catastrophizing as measured by the 13-item PCS. Total scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating greater catastrophic thinking about pain.

Time frame
Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention.
4

Active Lumbar Flexion (Fingertip-to-Floor Distance)

Change in active trunk forward flexion measured in centimeters from the tip of the longest finger of the dominant hand to the floor. Lower values indicate greater lumbar and hamstring mobility.

Time frame
Pre-intervention to immediately post-intervention.

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Evidence In Motion

Lead sponsor

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Collaborator

College of St. Scholastica, Inc.

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: