About this trial
Low back pain (LBP) is frequently managed in physical therapy using the McKenzie method, in which a patient's directional preference-most commonly extension-is used to guide treatment. Extension-based interventions are associated with symptom improvement and centralization in many individuals with LBP. At the same time, research in pain neuroscience has shown that people with LBP may have altered cortical representations of the low back, which may contribute to pain and disability. For patients who experience high pain levels or significant fear of movement, active directional preference exercises may be difficult to perform.
Motor imagery, the mental simulation of movement without physical execution, has been shown to activate brain regions involved in movement and may help modify altered cortical representations. Preliminary research has suggested that virtual or imagery-based McKenzie extension exercises may improve pain and movement-related outcomes.
This exploratory study aims to evaluate the immediate effects of a brief motor imagery-based extension protocol in adults with LBP who demonstrate a directional preference for extension. The study will assess changes in pain intensity, disability, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, lumbar flexion, straight leg raise, pain distribution, and symptom centralization following a single motor imagery session.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Motor Imagery-Based Lumbar Extension
BehavioralParticipants will lie prone with hands positioned under the shoulders in a standard "pre-press-up" position. With eyes closed, participants will be verbally guided through ten imagined lumbar extension press-ups. The standardized motor imagery script includes: Focusing attention on current back and leg symptoms Imagining pushing the arms into extension Visualizing the back arching into extension Holding the imagined end-range position for several seconds Imagining returning to the starting position in a controlled manner Repeating this process ten times Total duration of the protocol is approximately 5 minutes. Mode of Delivery: In-person, guided by a physical therapist trained in the study protocol. Purpose: To evaluate immediate changes in pain, disability, psychological measures, physical mobility, neurodynamic measures, and symptom centralization following a motor imagery-based extension intervention.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Low Back Pain Intensity (NPRS - Low Back)
Change in self-reported low back pain intensity measured using the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.
Leg Pain Intensity (NPRS - Leg)
Change in self-reported leg pain intensity using the 0-10 NPRS.
Secondary outcomes
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Change in disability level measured by the 10-item ODI questionnaire. Scores range from 0-50, multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage (0-100%), with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) - Physical Activity Subscale
Change in fear-avoidance beliefs related to work. The 7-item FABQ-W yields scores from 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater work-related fear-avoidance.
Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS)
Change in pain catastrophizing as measured by the 13-item PCS. Total scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating greater catastrophic thinking about pain.
Active Lumbar Flexion (Fingertip-to-Floor Distance)
Change in active trunk forward flexion measured in centimeters from the tip of the longest finger of the dominant hand to the floor. Lower values indicate greater lumbar and hamstring mobility.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Evidence In Motion
Lead sponsor
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Collaborator
College of St. Scholastica, Inc.
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: