Virtual Reality Training for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age22-45
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

About this trial

Cholecystectomy is one the most frequent laparoscopic procedures worldwide. It is a safe and effective operation but intraoperative bile duct injury remains a relevant complication with serious consequences for the patient. Most of the complications occur due to a lack of knowledge of the anatomy or misidentification of the cystic duct. Thus, the study of the anatomy is a cornerstone of a successful procedure and the preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a way to preoperatively determine relevant structures to avoid intraoperative incidents.

This trial has been designed to assess the effect of preoperative virtual reality training based on MRCP on intraoperative performance and outcome.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Referred for elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis/chronic cholecystitis

Early cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis

Concomitant minor procedures (adhesiolysis, umbilical hernia repair, liver biopsy)

Sufficient quality of MRCP

Disqualifiers

American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ 4

Previous major open upper abdominal surgery

Suspicion for concomitant biliary disease (e.g. Mirizzi-Syndrome)

Robotic cholecystectomy

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Virtual Reality training

    Procedure/Surgery

    In the Virtual Reality (VR) study arm, a VR software (Specto VRTM, version 4.0, Diffuse Ltd, Heimberg, Switzerland) will be used to display volumetric MRCP data using a tethered head-mounted display (HMD) prior to the operation. Specto uses volume rendering at 180 frames/sec to visualize the medical data in an immersive fashion in the VR environment and allows for viewing of the 3D reconstructed 3D imaging with 360° free movement. Each participant will perform a procedure with VR training and one with conventional preparation (MRCP).

  • Conventional training

    Procedure/Surgery

    In the conventional study arm, the participants will view the preoperative MRCP.

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Virtual Reality MRCPExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional MRCPActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by assisting surgeon

For the global assessment of laparoscopic skills, the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) will be used. Evaluation will be performed by the attending surgeon. The GOALS is a 5 item rating scale and the items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale where "1" represents the lowest level of performance, and "5" is considered ideal performance. The total score for the global rating scale is the sum of the scores for each of the 5 items for a maximum total score of 25.

Time frame
On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)

Secondary outcomes

1

Global Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) score assessed by resident

For the global assessment of laparoscopic skills, the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) will be used. Evaluation will be performed by the resident (self-assessment).

Time frame
On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)
2

Critical View of Safety

The "Sanford-Strasberg' Critical-view-of-safety (CVS)" is a method for judging the CVS objectively through intraoperative photographs. It evaluates the CVS captured by anterior and posterior ("doublet") views. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum is 6. The higher the score, the more satisfactory is the CVS. The "Sanford-Strasberg' CVS Score" is useful in evaluating the CVS in video records and the CVS has been recognized as an essential and effective security method to reduce the risk of bile duct injury.

Time frame
Postoperative within 30 days (Video-Analysis)
3

Time to critical view of safety

Time required to achieve the CVS or i.e. until the clips are placed during the operation.

Time frame
Postoperative within 30 days (Video-Analysis)
4

Efficiency improvement

Discrepancy between actual and planned operative time

Time frame
On the day of surgery (within 12 hours)

Other outcomes

1

Length of hospital stay

Length of the total hospital stay (days)

Time frame
At the day of discharge
2

90-day postoperative Complications

All postoperative deviations from the normal expected course graded according to the Accordion classification and the comprehensive complication index.

Time frame
Until 90 days after surgery

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.