About this trial
According to reports in the literature, from 2012 to date, there has been an increase in the number of diagnosed cases of autochthonous visceral Leishmania in the Province of Bologna.
In this context, it was decided to carry out a retrospective prospective observational study, which is essential to describe the epidemiology of LV in order to outline the scientific and rational bases necessary for the drafting of guidelines to standardise the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to this disease, in order to reduce the diagnostic delay and improve therapeutic results.
therapeutic outcome. In addition, epidemiological data will make it possible to identify possible new strategies to control the disease, which are essential for reducing its transmission.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients of any age with microbiologically established diagnosis of LV.
Obtaining Informed Consent.
Disqualifiers
not having obtained Informed Consent
Trial population
Any patient with a diagnosis of established Visceral Leishmaniasis but also patients with a diagnosis of prior Visceral Leishmaniasis.
Trial design
Cohort
Other
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Epidemiology of Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) cases in Emilia-Romagna
In-depth description of the epidemiology of autochthonous visceral Leishmaniasis in the Emilia-Romagna region, focusing on the increase in diagnosed cases since 2012. The study will provide critical data for identifying trends in incidence, affected populations, and geographical hotspots, essential for guiding public health interventions. Measure: Number of diagnosed cases per year across participating centers. Unit of measure: Number of cases (n). Collection method: Review of medical records and epidemiological registries.
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with VL
Detailed analysis of the clinical features and presentations of diagnosed LV cases, including common symptoms such as fever, weight loss, splenomegaly, and laboratory findings like anemia and pancytopenia. This analysis will help establish a clearer clinical profile for early diagnosis and treatment strategies. Measure: Age, gender, comorbidities, geographic area of residence, known exposure mode. Unit of measure: Mean ± standard deviation (continuous variables), percentages (categorical variables). Collection method: clinical data collection.
Secondary outcomes
Diagnostic accuracy of methods used for VL identification
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of available methods (serological tests, RT-PCR, direct microscopy, and culture) in identifying LV cases, particularly in immunocompromised patients and those with atypical presentations. The study will assess the effectiveness of these tests in different clinical scenarios, including their sensitivity and specificity. Measure: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests (EIA, IFAT, RT-PCR, rK39 ICT, direct microscopy). Unit of measure: Percentage (%). Collection method: Comparison with the diagnostic gold standard (bone marrow biopsy with parasite identification).
Monitoring of therapy tolerability
Ongoing assessment of the safety and tolerability of therapeutic interventions used to treat LV, with a focus on identifying potential adverse effects or complications arising from current treatment regimens. This includes monitoring for any therapy-related side effects and evaluating the suitability of treatment options in different patient populations. Measure: Number of participants with adverse events (evaluated according to CTCAE v4.0 criteria). Unit of measure: Number of adverse events (n), percentage (%). Collection method: Adverse event reporting forms and clinical reports.
Evaluation of therapeutic outcomes of treated cases.
Comprehensive assessment of the therapeutic outcomes in patients treated for LV, measuring the effectiveness of current treatment protocols in terms of clinical improvement, survival rates, and relapse prevention. This will also involve tracking long-term patient recovery and any subsequent need for retreatment. Measure: Complete cure rate, recurrence rate at 6 and 12 months, disease-related mortality. Unit of measure: Percentage (%), time to recurrence in days (d). Collection method: Clinical and laboratory follow-up.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Lead sponsor
AUSL Romagna Rimini
Collaborator
Ospedale Bufalini di Cesena, Italy
Collaborator
Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital
Collaborator
Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna - AUSL Romagna
Collaborator