About this trial
Extreme heat events are becoming more frequent, intense, and prolonged, increasing the risk of heat-related illness among workers performing physically demanding work in hot environments. Occupational heat-stress guidelines use work-rest schedules to limit increases in core temperature and physiological strain, but they do not clearly define the safe maximum duration of continuous work before heat-mitigation controls should begin, known as the initial stay time. Recent work has generated initial stay time recommendations for young and older workers performing moderate-intensity work in the heat; however, these recommendations were developed under normoxic conditions. In many workplaces, heat may occur alongside additional stressors such as hypoxia, including work at altitude or in oxygen-reduced environments. Hypoxia can increase cardiovascular strain, reduce arterial oxygen saturation, and impair exercise tolerance, potentially compromising heat-stress guidance developed under normal oxygen conditions. Older workers may be especially vulnerable because of age-related reductions in thermoregulatory and cardiovascular function. It remains unclear whether hypoxia increases physiological strain during work in the heat or whether current initial stay time and recovery recommendations remain protective under combined heat and hypoxic stress.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether hypoxia increases physiological strain during moderate-intensity work in the heat in young and older males. Specifically, the study will assess whether normoxia-derived initial stay times and recovery recommendations for work at 29°C wet-bulb globe temperature (37.5°C, 35% RH) remain effective during exposure to 14% inspired oxygen, simulating approximately 3000 m altitude. Healthy young and older males will complete two simulated occupational heat exposures: heat alone and heat plus hypoxia. Participants will perform moderate-intensity treadmill work based on age-specific initial stay times, followed by prescribed work-rest cycles and seated recovery. Core temperature, cardiovascular strain, oxygen saturation, skin temperature, hydration status, perceptual responses, mood, environmental stress symptoms, and cognitive function will be assessed to determine whether hypoxia modifies responses to work in the heat. Findings will help determine whether occupational heat-stress guidance requires refinement for workers exposed to combined heat and hypoxic stress.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Are male.
Do not smoke or have been smoke free for at least 5 years.
English or French speaking.
Ability to provide informed consent.
Disqualifiers
Are regularly exposed to hot environments (e.g., occupational heat exposure)
Are regularly exposed to hypoxic environments (e.g., high altitudes)
Experience claustrophobia or discomfort in enclosed environments
Episode(s) of severe hypoglycemia (requiring the assistance of another person) within the previous year, or inability to sense hypoglycemia (hypoglycemia unawareness).
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Simulated Occupational heat exposure under normoxic conditions
Other interventionParticipants complete a simulated moderate-intensity occupational heat exposure protocol involving treadmill walking in a hot environment (37.5°C, 35% RH) under normoxic conditions (\~20.9% inspired oxygen). Participants walk until they reach their initial stay time, followed by prescribed work-rest cycles and seated recovery.
Simulated Occupational heat exposure under hypoxic conditions
Other interventionParticipants complete a simulated moderate-intensity occupational heat exposure protocol involving treadmill walking in a hot environment (37.5°C, 35% RH) with an added hypoxic exposure equivalent to 14% inspired oxygen. Participants walk until they reach their initial stay time, followed by prescribed work-rest cycles and seated recovery.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Total work volume
Total work completed during the 240-minute work bout. The work period consists of an initial continuous walking phase to a core temperature 38.0°C or 1°C increase above baseline resting, followed by intermittent work-rest cycles.
Secondary outcomes
Time to core temperature of 38.0°C
Time, in minutes, from the start of continuous walking to the point at which core temperature reaches 38.0°C. Participants who do not reach 38.0°C before voluntary termination, reaching the applicable stopping criterion, or completing 240 minutes of continuous walking will have their time recorded at termination or completion.
Time to 1.0°C increase in core temperature
Time, in minutes, from the start of continuous walking to the point at which rectal temperature increases by 1.0°C above baseline. For participant safety, continuous walking will not continue beyond a rectal temperature of 38.5°C. Therefore, for participants who reach 38.5°C before attaining a 1.0°C increase in rectal temperature, the time at which 38.5°C is reached will be recorded. Participants who voluntarily terminate exercise or complete 240 minutes of continuous walking before reaching either endpoint will have their time recorded at termination or completion.
Average core temperature during work/rest cycles
Average core temperature measured during the intermittent work-rest cycles following the initial continuous work period.
Heart rate at core temperature of 38.0°C
Heart rate measured at the time a participant reaches a rectal temperature of 38.0°C during the initial continuous walking period. For participants who do not reach a rectal temperature of 38.0°C before voluntary termination, reaching the applicable stopping criterion, or completing 240 minutes of continuous walking, heart rate at termination or completion will be recorded.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.