About this trial
Multicentric evaluation of best corrected visual acuity of the XEN implant versus classic trabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma subjects
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (Primary open angle glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, Pigmentary dispersion glaucoma)
Clinically eligible for both surgeries (Trabeculectomy and XEN) on the discretion of the surgeon (area of healthy, free and mobile conjunctiva in the superior nasal target quadrant)
VA logMAR ≤ 1 (VA dec ≥ 0.1)
Trabecular meshwork must be visible (with Shaffer angle grade > 1 in the target quadrant)
Disqualifiers
Clinical significant cataract
Subject has had prior cataract surgery in study eye ≤ 1 months (count to operation)
Subject has had prior (incisional) glaucoma surgery (XEN, trabeculectomy, viscocanalostomy, canaloplasty, shunts of any type, collagen implants, etc.). Prior iridotomy is acceptable.
Phacic Angle Closure Glaucoma
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
surgery
Device2 types of filtering glaucoma surgeries (classic trabeculectomy as gold standard, and newer XEN glaucoma microstent) are compared against each other in a prospective multicentric randomized study
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity at 1 Week
The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a best corrected distance visual acuity \> 0.3 (logMAR) after 1 week.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Prof. Dr. Herbert Reitsamer
Lead sponsor
Paracelsus Medical University
Sponsor institution