About this trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of YES-IDEAS (YES: Innovative Discussion for Engagement, Achievement, and Service)compared to regular after school programming in increasing youth empowerment, promoting positive behaviors, and decreasing youth violence.
Through the evidence-based YES (Youth Empowerment Solutions) program, youth design and implement projects to help improve their communities. In the current study, investigators adapted the existing YES curriculum to empower youth from diverse backgrounds to reduce violent behavior. The adapted curriculum, YES-IDEAS, focus on middle school students.
The investigators test the effects of YES-IDEAS curriculum on youths' sense of empowerment, attitudes, and violent behavior. They designed the study to be a group-randomized trial in after-school programs across multiple middle schools in south-east Michigan, but issues that arose due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other practical issues with the schools we modified the design to be a matched control group design at the school level. Matching variables included size, geographic locations, race/ethnicity, free/reduced lunch status. Dose-response and sustainability of YES-IDEAS effects are also examined.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Students enrolled in afterschool programs at multiple middle schools in Counties across south-east Michigan
Students in 6th through 8th grade
Students who assent
Disqualifiers
Non-students
Students who do not assent or whose parents notify us of their refusal
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
YES IDEAS
BehavioralYES IDEAS is an adapted version of the evidence based YES (Youth Empowerment Solutions) program. Through the YES program, youth design and implement their own projects to help improve their own communities. The adapted YES IDEAS curriculum empowers youth from various backgrounds to address bullying and promote positive behaviors as a way to reduce violent behavior. Over the course of the program, youth carry out a community change project aimed at promoting non-violence in their community.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Violence Perpetration
6 items on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (3 or more times) assess the frequency of physical violence perpetration in the past 30 days. A sample item is "In the past 30 days, how often have you hit someone with your fists or beat up someone?" A higher score indicates more instances of violence perpetration in the past 30 days. Items were adapted for the current study from Hurd et al. (2011).
Change in Targeted Aggression
5 items on a 6-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (never) to 6 (5 or more times) measure frequency of aggression targeted toward specific group in the past 30 days. A sample item includes "In the past 30 days, how often have you told lies or spread false rumors about someone because of their race?" Higher scores indicate more instances of targeted aggression perpetration. Items were adapted for the current study from the Multisite Violence Prevention Project (2004) and Brondolo et al. (2005).
Change in Prosocial behaviors
3 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) measure students' prosocial behavior. A sample item is "I am kind to other people." Higher scores indicate more prosocial behavior. Items were adapted for the current study from Nielsen et al., 2015.
Change in Bystander behaviors
6 items on a 2-point scale from 0 (no) to 1 (yes) assess youths' bystander behaviors. A sample item is "Have you called out someone who says something bad about another race or makes a racial joke?" Higher scores indicate youth engage in more positive bystander behaviors. Items were adapted for the current study from Salmivalli et al., 1996.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of Michigan
Lead sponsor
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Collaborator