Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorZimmer Biomet

About this trial

The objectives of this study are to confirm the early to mid- term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the Z1 Femoral Hip System in hemi- and primary total hip arthroplasty.

Cohort 0 The primary endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 2 years, which is based on the absence of removal of the study device and will be evaluated using a one-sample proportion as well as using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will additionally be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, including relation to implant, instrumentation, and/or procedure.

The secondary endpoints are defined by the functional performance and clinical benefits of the study device and are assessed by patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs)(Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR)).

Cohort 1 The primary performance endpoint is the assessment of the HOOS JR, specifically the within-patient change from baseline to 2-years post-op. The mean change from baseline will be compared against a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 9.46 points.

The key secondary safety endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 2 years, which is based on the absence of removal of the study device and will be evaluated using a one-sample proportion as well as using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will additionally be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, including relation to implant, instrumentation, and/or procedure.

Exploratory outcomes include:

* EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) * Patient Satisfaction * Radiographic outcomes, where available

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient is at least 18 years old and skeletally mature

Patient is physically and mentally willing and able, in the Investigator's opinion at the time of enrollment, to be compliant with the protocol, including all scheduled study evaluations

Patient, or the patient's legally authorized representative, is willing and able to participate in the Informed Consent process and provide their consent

Advanced wear of the joint due to degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatic diseases

Disqualifiers

Revision arthroplasty

Acute, chronic, local, or systemic infection(s)

Severe muscular, neural, or vascular diseases that endanger the limb(s) involved

Lack of bony structures proximal or distal to the joint, so that good anchorage of the implant is unlikely or impossible

Trial population

The study population should consist of up to 300 subjects implanted with the Z1 Femoral Hip System in hemi or total hip arthroplasty, according to the approved indications. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are based on the indications and contraindications defined in the IFU for the Z1 Femoral Hip System.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Other

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Z1 Femoral Hip System

    Device

    Subjects who will be implanted with the Z1 Femoral Hip System in hemi-hip arthroplasty and primary total hip arthroplasty

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Cohort 01 intervention
Group B: Cohort 11 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

2 Year Primary Outcome (Cohort 0)

The primary endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 2 years, which is based on the absence of removal of the study device and will be evaluated using a one-sample proportion as well as using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will additionally be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, including relation to implant, instrumentation, and/or procedure. Cohort 1

Time frame
2 years post-operative
2

2 Year Primary Outcome (Cohort 1)

The primary performance endpoint is the assessment of the HOOS JR, specifically the within-patient change from baseline to 2-years post-op. The mean change from baseline will be compared against a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 9.46 points.

Time frame
2 years post-operative

Secondary outcomes

1

HOOS Jr

Cohort 0: The functional performance and clinical benefits of the study device will be assessed by a patient-reported clinical outcomes measure (PROM)(HOOS JR).

Time frame
5 years post-operative
2

Survivorship

Cohort 1: The key secondary safety endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 2 years, which is based on the absence of removal of the study device and will be evaluated using a one-sample proportion as well as using the Kaplan Meier method. The safety of the system will additionally be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events, including relation to implant, instrumentation, and/or procedure. Each secondary endpoint will be followed out to 5 years.

Time frame
2 Years post-operative

Other outcomes

1

Exploratory Outcome: EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)

Cohort 1: The EQ-5D-5L PROM will be collected preoperatively, 1, 2, and 5 years.

Time frame
5 Years Postoperative
2

Exploratory Outcome: Patient Satisfaction

Cohort 1: Patient satisfaction will be collected at 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years

Time frame
5 years postoperative

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.