Zirconia Crowns Versus Extraction of Primary Anterior Teeth

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age3-5
SponsorPassant Nagy

About this trial

Severely mutilated anterior primary teeth in preschool children are frequently managed by extraction. However, premature loss of anterior primary teeth has been associated with adverse functional, developmental and psychosocial outcomes, including impaired oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), speech concerns and negative self-image.

Prefabricated zirconia crowns offer an aesthetic and durable restorative alternative for compromised anterior primary teeth. Despite increasing clinical use, comparative evidence evaluating zirconia crown restoration versus extraction under equivalent conditions using validated patient-centred, developmental and economic outcomes remains limited.

This pragmatic, prospective, non-randomised controlled clinical study aims to compare zirconia crown restoration and extraction of severely mutilated anterior primary teeth performed under GA in preschool children. Outcomes include OHRQoL, parental satisfaction, child self-image, and speech development.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Children aged 3-5 years

Presence of one or more decayed primary anterior teeth

Written informed consent from parent or legal guardian

Disqualifiers

Craniofacial anomalies or genetic syndromes

Diagnosed developmental delay or speech disorders

Previous speech therapy

Systemic disease contraindicating general anaesthesia

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Zirconia Crown
  • Extraction

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators

Passant Nagy

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Sponsor institution