Acute Exacerbation of COPD

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a shorter course of antibiotics (7 days) works as well as the usual longer course (14 days) for adults admitted to hospital with a flare-up of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a long-term lung disease. The trial takes place at CDA Hospital Islamabad, Pakistan. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do patients who take antibiotics for 7 days recover as well by Day 30 as patients who take them for 14 days? * Does the shorter course lead to fewer side effects and less antibiotic use, without more treatment failures, relapses or hospital readmissions? Researchers will compare a 7-day antibiotic course with the usual 14-day course to see if the shorter course is just as effective. Participants will: * Be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to take antibiotics for either 7 days or 14 days. Their doctor chooses which antibiotic to use. * Receive all other usual hospital care for their COPD flare-up. * Have check-ups about 3-5 days, 7 days, 14 days and 30 days after joining the trial, in hospital or by telephone, to record their symptoms, any side effects and any return to hospital. About 560 adults will take part.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Acute exacerbations frequently require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Oxygen therapy is an essential component of treatment; however, excessive oxygen administration may aggravate hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis. Current international guidelines recommend titrated oxygen therapy targeting an oxygen saturation of 88-92% in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, but evidence supporting this strategy in critically ill ICU patients remains limited. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare a controlled oxygen therapy strategy (target oxygen saturation 88-92%) with standard oxygen therapy (oxygen saturation \>94%) in ICU patients admitted with acute exacerbation of COPD. The primary objective is to determine whether controlled oxygen therapy reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive). Secondary objectives include assessing the 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and adverse events related to hyperoxia.

This prospective, monocenter pilot study will investigate the relationship between indoor environmental quality (including air quality, lighting, noise, and thermal conditions), wearable-derived health insights, and patient-reported symptoms in patients recovering at home after hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Participants will undergo continuous monitoring of indoor environmental conditions and health parameters using a Garmin Venu 4 smartwatch, together with validated questionnaires assessing COPD symptoms, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness during one month. The study will assess the feasibility and potential added value of high-resolution home monitoring and explore whether environmental and wearable-derived measures are associated with symptom burden and early signs of clinical deterioration following hospital discharge. The investigators hypothesize that continuous in-home monitoring of indoor environmental quality is feasible and provides clinically relevant insights into symptom burden in recently hospitalized COPD patients. The primary objective is to determine the correlation between indoor environmental quality (IEQ) variables and symptom burden in COPD patients following hospitalization for AECOPD.

This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effectiveness of active remote intervention versus passive monitoring alone in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure who are receiving home non-invasive respiratory support. The primary goal is to evaluate the impact on health-related quality of life and the frequency of acute exacerbations over a 12-month period.

In this pilot study the feasibility of performing a larger trial to study the non-inferiority of High Flow Nasal Oxygen compared to non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute acidotic hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD wil be investigated

COPD is a common chronic disease. Its natural course is characterized by Acute exacerbations (AE). This may require hospitalization or even ICU/RESUSCITATION admission. The most common causes are respiratory distress with hypercapnic acidosis that requires mechanical ventilation (Invasive or non-invasive). Lower respiratory tract infections, bacteria and/or viruses are the main pathogenic factors of AE. The treatment of AECOPD is initially symptomatic treatment, combining bronchodilators, ventilatory support (oxygen therapy and/or mechanical ventilation) and respiratory physiotherapy. Systemic corticosteroid therapy is optional. When i) the sputum is purulent and ii) increased dyspnea and / or an increase in sputum volume is observed, antibiotic treatment is recommended for hospitalized patients. Antibiotic therapy is routinely recommended when mechanical ventilation is required. During ICU/RESUSCITATION AECOPD, more than 85% of patients received antibiotic therapy, with a median duration of 8 to 9 days, and the benefit of antibiotic therapy is likely to be limited to infected patients. Suspected or documented lower respiratory tract bacteria, that is, 25% to 50% of patients. This will lead to overuse of antibiotics, which is a problem for patients and the community. A personalized antibiotic strategy could limit this phenomenon, relying on multimodal methods, using aspect of sputum (clinical method), procalcitonin (PCT) (biological method) and the FilmArray ™ Pneumonia Panel extended panel multiplex respiratory PCR Plus (mPCR FA-PPP) (Biomérieux®) (microbiological approach). The hypothesis of this study is that sputum appearance, procalcitonin (PCT) and the FilmArray ™ Pneumonia Panel Plus expanded panel multiplex respiratory PCR (mPCR FA-PPP) (Biomérieux®) could be used in combination , and their results integrated into a decision-making algorithm aimed at personalizing antibiotic therapy and guiding its early termination in patients admitted to ICU/RESUSCITATION due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) to the main benefit of antibiotic savings, and without additional risk to patient safety.

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition and the fourth leading cause of death worldwide. With the rise of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), mortality among patients admitted for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure has decreased, though to a lesser extent than reported in the studies that validated this technique. We hypothesize that inappropriate initial ventilatory parameter settings for NIV could be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in this context. Objective The primary objective of this study is to assess the initial NIV settings used in intensive care units (ICUs) and respiratory intensive care or medical intensive care units (MICUs) in this patient population. A secondary objective is to evaluate whether specific ventilatory settings are associated with mortality or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Methods This is a prospective multicenter observational study aiming to include 976 patients. NIV settings will be recorded at initiation, after the first recommended arterial blood gas (ABG) evaluation (between 1.5 and 2 hours of ventilation), and at 24 and 48 hours. Patient characteristics, including medical history, clinical and biological parameters at admission, will be collected. Vital status and the need for IMV will be recorded at ICU discharge and on day 28 (D28).

Objectives: To determine whether CRP-guided antibiotic treatment for managing AECOPD in adult patients attending Emergency Departments leads to reduced antibiotic duration, without non-inferior COPD health status with usual care. Hypothesis to be tested: (i) The antibiotic duration in AECOPD patients will be significantly lower for CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation than usual care; and (ii) COPD health status as measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire has no statistically significant difference between two groups. Design and subjects: Multi-center, single-blind, open-label, randomized, combined superiority (antibiotic duration) and non-inferiority (COPD health status) trial in 1,184 adult AECOPD patients presented to A\&E. Instruments: Clinical COPD Questionnaire and EuroQol-5D Interventions: Both intervention and control groups follow usual care with GOLD strategy. The intervention group will be recommended to test for serum CRP daily. Antibiotic prescription is considered when CRP \>5mg/dL. Once CRP has declined to \<5mg/dL and the patient was afebrile for past 48 hours, antibiotic discontinuation will be considered. Communication with Receiving Ward Staffs: Participants in the study may transfer to another departments after treatment/ care in A\&E. The following communication would be conducted: * A handover note that informs the receiving ward staffs about patients' enrolment to the trial, group assignment, and previous treatments given in A\&E. The note would also suggest the investigations for the receiving ward staffs. * Telephone handover about intervention group and investigations of the study, and treatments given in A\&E to ward. Main outcome measures: The antibiotic duration (total number of antibiotic days) within 28 days and recovery in terms of COPD health status (Clinical COPD Questionnaire total scores) within 14 days from randomisation. Data analysis: Intention-to-treat and cost-effectiveness analyses will be performed. The outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Expected results: The intervention group will exhibit reduction in antibiotic duration at 4-weeks, without negatively impacting on COPD health status, compared with the control group.