Alcohol

This pilot study will evaluate communication strategies that may improve public understanding of alcohol-related cancer risks and influence behavioral intentions. The study will compare graphic alcohol cancer warning labels with the current U.S. Surgeon General text-only warning label across two stages. The first stage is an in-person, lab-based eye-tracking experiment that will examine differences in visual attention, communication outcomes, harm perception, and behavioral intentions following exposure to graphic versus text-only warning labels. The second stage is a discrete choice experiment that will examine how warning label type, warning label size, and alcohol type (beer, wine, or liquor) influence participants' intentions to reduce or stop alcohol consumption and purchase alcohol. The study will recruit 50 adults aged 21 years or older who report regular alcohol consumption.

This pilot randomized behavioral study evaluates the feasibility, adherence, and acceptability of an intervention to restrict flavored ready-to-drink (RTD) alcoholic beverages among young adults who regularly use both alcohol and e-cigarettes. Participants will complete a 2-week baseline period followed by a 2-week intervention period. Participants will be randomized to either avoid flavored RTD alcoholic beverages or continue their usual alcohol consumption. Primary outcomes include feasibility, adherence, acceptability. Secondary outcomes include preliminary efficacy of flavored RTD restriction on alcohol consumption and e-cigarette use measured through daily electronic diaries; biomarkers of alcohol and nicotine exposure, including urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG), urinary cotinine, and blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth).

Alcohol increases the risk for at least seven cancers, yet recent estimates suggest only between one-third and one-half of US adults are aware of this risk. The current study aims to develop and test alcohol-cancer messages designed for a mass media public health campaign. The messages will be informed by theory-based constructs proximal to health behavior change (e.g., perceived likelihood/severity of harm, response efficacy). We will evaluate messages via an online, cross-sectional message testing randomized experiment. Participants will be US adults aged 21+ recruited from Qualtrics Panels.

Consuming alcohol is a dose-dependent and modifiable risk factor for breast cancer. Although alcohol consumption contributes to an estimated 16% of breast cancer cases, awareness of the link between alcohol and breast cancer risk remains low. Systematically developed and tested health warnings can support population-based approaches and intervention strategies to decrease alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk. For instance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration can mandate specific warnings through statements (e.g., "WARNING: This product contains nicotine…") and color graphics depicting the negative health consequences of products that can harm public health, such as tobacco and alcohol. However, health warning statements and graphics should be assessed among intended audiences before implementation. Research has outlined principles for effective health warning statements. This project will test different health warning statements about the health effects of alcohol.

This is an online cross-sectional experimental survey study examining two cancer communication questions: 1) What features of social media messages communicating the breast cancer risks from alcohol consumption will motivate young adult women to drink less? and 2) Do message features differ in their persuasive effects based on young adult women's alcohol consumption behavior?

This study is to learn how the weight loss drug tirzepatide (Zepbound) changes the way a body handles alcohol. 5 participants aged 21-55 who take Zepbound will be enrolled and can expect to be on study for up to 4 weeks.

The goal of this study is to understand how caffeine and alcohol affect the ocular and physiological systems, especially how the pupil (the aperture in the colored part of the eye) responds to light. It will also test whether these changes can be used to detect recent caffeine or alcohol intake using a portable eye device. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How does caffeine change pupil responses, eye movements, and other ocular and physiological measurements? 2. How does alcohol change these same ocular and physiological responses? 3. Are the effects of caffeine and alcohol different from each other? 4. Can these changes be used to accurately identify whether someone has consumed caffeine or alcohol? Researchers will compare caffeine, alcohol, and a placebo (a look-alike drink with no active substance) to see how each affects the ocular and physiological outcomes. Participants will: 1. Attend three separate sessions where they will consume caffeine, alcohol, or a placebo (in random order) 2. Undergo pupillary response evaluation using a handheld device that measures responses to different colored light stimuli 3. Have their eye movements analyzed 4. Have retinal and choroidal thickness, blood perfusion, and ocular oxygen levels measured 5. Have basic body measurements recorded (such as pulse rate and blood pressure) 6. Complete tests at multiple time points over 2 hours after consumption The results of this study may help develop a quick and non-invasive way to detect recent caffeine or alcohol use for clinical and safety purposes.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the drug semaglutide works to reduce alcohol intake among adults living with HIV. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does semaglutide lower the average number of alcoholic beverages participants drink per week? 2. Does semaglutide lower the average number of cigarettes participants smoke per day? 3. Does semaglutide decrease the risk for cardiovascular disease among people living with HIV who drink alcohol and/or smoke tobacco? Researchers will compare the effects of semaglutide to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if semaglutide works to lower the alcohol intake among participants each week. Participants will: 1. Take semaglutide for 3 months 2. Visit the research clinic 3 times for checkups and tests 3. Provide blood samples, stool samples, and saliva samples for tests.

This proposed study aims to develop and examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a proactive intervention model that combines brief psychological counselling, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and social media psychosocial support group to reduce alcohol consumption in women.

The goal of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of Safe Night Out, a community-level primary violence prevention program offered in drinking establishments in the Sacramento region of California. The main questions this project aims to answer are: 1) Does the Safe Night Out program reduce incidents of sexual violence and intimate partner violence among patrons? 2) Does the Safe Night Out program increase incidents of safety checks of patrons by staff participants? To address these questions, we will enroll 150 staff participants and 500 patron participants from 25 drinking establishments that have implemented the Safe Night Out program (\~3 staff participants and 10 patron participants per drinking establishment) and 25 drinking establishments that have not implemented the Safe Night Out program (\~3 staff participants and 10 patron participants per drinking establishment). Participants will complete a baseline and three 6-month follow-up assessments, until 18 month-follow-up.

The objective of this Phase 2 randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effects of weekly tirzepatide (vs. placebo) on alcohol consumption and cardiometabolic outcomes in adults with alcohol use disorder and overweight or obesity.

In humans, alcohol-related dysbiosis exists with a decrease in bacteroides. This dysbiosis is responsible for the breakdown of the intestinal barrier by a decrease in the synthesis of protective mucus, and some proteins involved in tight junctions or a decrease in defensin (Reg3b, Reg3g) which promotes bacterial growth and ultimately bacterial translocation. The microbiota of a patient with alcoholic hepatitis is different from that of a patient without alcoholic hepatitis. Acute alcoholic hepatitis has a severe prognosis and corticosteroids are the only first line therapy option, with better survival at 28 days versus placebo. However, mortality remains high at 30% at 3 months, which highlights the importance of seeking intestinal microbiota profile on treatment response. The determination of one or more intestinal microbiota signatures associated with the treatment response Corticosteroids plus FMT or Corticosteroids plus placebo will allow the clinician to have a simple and rapid test obtained in 16S RNA analysis to predict the therapeutic response and potentially the best treatment to adopt and to address medical and medico-economic stakes. The investigators will first characterize the alcohol-induced dysbiosis by a whole microbiota sequencing in the different groups. Specific bacterial species identify by DNA sequencing should be confirmed by qPCR of 16S rDNA to determine a fingerprint of sAH microbiota. Metabolic properties of intestinal microbiota, such as production of short chain fatty acids, will be analyzed by using HPLC. In the sAH group, evolution of intestinal microbiota will be observed by shotgun DNA sequencing between the day 0 and the day 7 of corticosteroids treatment. The analysis of sAH patients' microbiota (day 0) will allow us to obtain a non-responder profile to corticosteroids that can be used as a prognostic marker to use in the clinic. The deliverable is the bacterial fingerprint of the treatment response and its valuation is its use as a predictive tool of the response.

Study Title: Nutritional Supplement to Rapidly Decrease Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC): Safety and Efficacy Study Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial Objective: Evaluate safety and efficacy of a nutritional supplement to rapidly decrease blood alcohol concentration (BAC), alcohol-induced impairment, and hangover symptoms after excessive alcohol consumption. Primary Outcomes: BAC reduction rate/extent (BACtrack S80™ breathalyzer) Cognitive/physical impairment change (DRUID app™) Secondary Outcome: Hangover symptom reduction (Acute Hangover Scale) Participants: 35 participants, recruited via social media Duration: 2 weeks, 2 testing sessions (4 hours each) Location: Closed facility in St. Petersburg, FL Procedure: Subjects consume standardized alcohol (1g ethanol/kg body weight) 40-minute drinking period BAC and impairment measurements Administration of test formulation or placebo Measurements: BAC: Baseline, 40min, 15min, 30min, 60min, 90min post-drinking Impairment: Baseline, 15min, 30min, 60min post-drinking Hangover: Next morning via text message Safety Measures: GRAS ingredients Lab testing of formulations Medical screening Adverse effect questionnaires Pregnancy tests BAC \<0.08% before leaving Key Features: Paired measurements: active vs. placebo for mini-drink and capsule formulations Uber transportation provided Strict inclusion/exclusion criteria Data Analysis: Electronic data entry Blinded submission for statistical analysis Paired comparisons and multiple statistical tests This study aims to provide robust data on the efficacy in mitigating alcohol's effects, potentially offering a new tool for reducing alcohol-related impairment and hangover symptoms. The design prioritizes safety, consistency, and scientific rigor to ensure reliable results.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if alcohol interacts with the drug candidate AFA-281 in adults (healthy volunteers). This trial will evaluate blood concentration levels of AFA-281 and ethanol. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does alcohol interact with AFA-281? What are the side effects (if any)? Researchers will compare AFA-281 to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if AFA-281 interacts with alcohol. Participants will take a total of 4 treatment sessions separated by at least 2 days between treatments. The treatments will incorporate AFA-281 or placebo with ethanol or ethanol placebo. After each treatment vital signs will be monitored and blood collected to measure AFA-281 and ethanol levels. Participants will provide an assessment survey of symptoms. The total treatment time will be 9 inpatient days (8 nights), and a final follow-up visit 3 to 5 days after clinic discharge.