Clinical trials

This study is the first time the new medicine CPV-104 is being tested in people. CPV-104 is designed to regulate the complement system, which can be overactive in diseases such as C3 glomerulopathy (C3G), an ultra-rare kidney disorder. The study includes healthy adults and adult patients with C3G to assess safety, tolerability, how the body processes the medicine, and whether the immune system reacts to it. The study is divided in two part; in Part 1 (SAD), healthy volunteers receive one IV dose of CPV-104 or a placebo while in Part 2 (MAD) patients with C3G receive four weekly IV doses of CPV-104 (no placebo). Participants will have close monitoring, including side-effect checks, blood and urine tests, ECGs, vital signs, and blood samples to measure drug levels and antibodies. For those with C3G, researchers will also observe kidney function, although the main goal is safety, not testing effectiveness. A Safety Review Committee will regularly review results to ensure it is safe to continue to the next dose or study group.

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate whether treatment with pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib leads to improved clinical outcomes compared to ruxolitinib alone in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF) who have not previously received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.

This is a non-interventional, multi-country, multi-centre, multicohort, primary data collection study, designed to assess patients' reported satisfaction with Atezolizumab Subcutenous (SC) treatment and Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), as well as the effectiveness and safety of Atezolizumab SC in participants treated for selected approved indications in routine clinical practice.

This study is designed to demonstrate the efficacy and assess safety and tolerability of oral daily alpelisib in participants with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS).

This study is to provide access for patients who are receiving treatment with dabrafenib and/or trametinib in a Novartis-sponsored Oncology Global Development, Global Medical Affairs or a former GSK-sponsored study who have fulfilled the requirements for the primary objective, and who are judged by the investigator as benefiting from continued treatment in the parent study as judged by the Investigator at the completion of the parent study.

The main purpose of this study is to assess if different dose levels of Brenipatide are safe and work the way they are intended to work in participants with moderate-to-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), when compared with placebo. The study will last approximately one year.

Emergency medical service (EMS) vehicles are exposed to a wide range of environmental conditions, including high temperatures during summer months. These conditions may affect the stability and quality of medications and blood products carried for emergency treatment. This observational study aims to evaluate the stability of human fibrinogen concentrates and human plasma proteins (Octaplas) when stored under routine operating conditions in a ground-based EMS ambulance in Graz, Austria. Drug samples will be analyzed monthly over a four-month period and compared with reference samples stored under recommended conditions. In addition, temperature inside the storage containers and the vehicle will be continuously monitored. The study will assess whether prolonged exposure to real-world prehospital storage conditions affects product stability and whether any changes are associated with environmental factors. The findings may help determine whether current storage practices in EMS vehicles are adequate for maintaining the quality of these blood coagulation products.

The purpose of this trial is: * To investigate whether cannabidiol (CBD), compared to placebo, can reduce the severity of attenuated psychotic symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. * To confirm the safety of CBD in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. The trial is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, international clinical trial. Individuals meeting clinical high risk for psychosis criteria will be recruited for the trial intervention component of the trial. Participants are randomised to treatment with oral CBD 300mg (oral solution 100 mg/mL) twice daily, or a matching placebo, for 104 weeks. By using a battery of clinical outcome assessments, the trial will be able to assess several biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes and response to treatment with CBD. Participants will be invited to provide blood samples, stool samples, cerebrospinal fluid samples (if aged 18 years or over) and complete neuroimaging assessments. Individuals who are not found to have mental illness as defined by DSM-5 criteria will be recruited to a healthy control group, to validate the biomarker component of the trial. Additionally, a control group of healthy volunteers will be recruited who will not take the trial intervention to aid calibration between datasets from sites acquiring MRI data and to inform and validate any possible multivariate signature associated with the CHR-P state, course or outcome by understanding how these measures are different in controls. Healthy controls will also be used for secondary case-control comparisons. Healthy controls will undergo clinical and biomarker assessments only.

A multicenter retrospective cohort analysis in Austria Primary Objective: To assess whether receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine within 3 months before starting ICI (Immune checkpoint inhibitors) therapy improves best overall response (mRECIST) in HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma). Secondary Objectives: Evaluate whether vaccination within 1 or 3 months affects OS (overall survival) , PFS (Progression free survival)), or TTP (Time to progression); compare outcomes by vaccination status, vaccine type, and prior infection; explore modification by cirrhosis severity and tumor characteristics; and assess safety (irAEs, steroid use, toxicity-related discontinuation).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard-of-care chemotherapy and bevacizumab with or without INCA33890 in the first-line treatment of metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.

The purpose of this study is to measure cardiovascular outcomes with orforglipron compared with placebo in participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Participation in the study will last about 5 years.

The current standard of care treatment for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of chemotherapy and, if indicated, donor stem cell transplantation. Bleximenib blocks the interaction between a protein called menin and another protein called KMT2A in the leukemia cells. When this interaction is disrupted in AML with mutations in the NPM1 or KMT2A gene, bleximenib can cause leukemia cells to die. The main objective is to assess if treatment with bleximenib, when added to chemotherapy treatment will improve treatment outcome in adult participants with newly diagnosed AML who present with mutations in the NPM1 or KMT2A genes. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. All of the participants will receive standard chemotherapy treatment, combined with either bleximenib or a placebo. A placebo is a substance that looks like the study medicine but has no active ingredients (e.g., a sugar pill). In a double blind trial neither the participant nor the doctor know if placebo or active study drug is given. After the end of the protocol treatment there will be an observational follow-up of 4 years from the time of inclusion of the last patient. The results of the different treatment groups will be compared. 875 previously untreated patients with AML with a specific change in the DNA of the leukemia cells (a KMT2A rearrangement or a NPM1 mutation) will be included. Participants must be 18 years or older and considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

This is a clinical study that has three parts. It is testing a potential new medicine called Sofetabart Mipitecan (Sofe-M) for people with certain types of ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancers. Part A enrolls participants with platinum-resistant cancer, meaning their disease progressed during or within six months of platinum-based chemotherapy. Parts B and C enroll participants with platinum-sensitive cancer, whose disease responded and remained controlled for at least six months after completing platinum treatment. The researchers want to find out if Sofe-M works better than the standard treatments that doctors use now and to better understand how safe it is. Each participant's time in the study will depend on how they respond to the treatment.

The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LY4268989 when given with mirikizumab compared to mirikizumab alone in adult participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Study participation will last approximately 118 weeks, including 104 weeks of treatment and may include up to 21 visits.

The main purpose of the SYNERGY-OUTCOMES study is to find out whether retatrutide and tirzepatide can prevent major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) in people with high-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The study will enroll adults who have MASLD based on non-invasive tests (NITs), which indicate they are more likely to develop MALO. Participants will be randomly assigned within a Master Protocol to receive either retatrutide (N1T-MC-RT01), tirzepatide (N1T-MC-TZ01) or placebo. The trial plans to enroll about 4,500 adults and will run for approximately 224 weeks. Participants may have up to approximately 25 to 30 clinic visits throughout the study to monitor their health, complete study procedures, and assess liver function and disease progression. Once the study is complete, eligible participants may participate in an optional 2-year extension study, in which all participants will receive either retatrutide or tirzepatide, even if they received placebo in the main study.

The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate that maridebart cafraglutide is superior to placebo when given as an adjunct to standard of care with respect to reducing cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality.

Rollover study for participants from predetermined, Incyte-sponsored parent clinical trials of povorcitinib.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in children (6 to \< 12 years old) with nonsegmental vitiligo.

The purpose of this study is: * To investigate whether the response to antipsychotic treatment can be enhanced by adding cannabidiol (CBD) to the existing treatment, compared to placebo, in participants with a first episode of psychosis, who have had a suboptimal or no response to their first antipsychotic treatment. * To confirm the safety of CBD in people with psychosis. The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, clinical trial. Individuals with a diagnosis of first-episode psychosis, who have had a suboptimal or no response to their first antipsychotic treatment will be recruited. These participants are randomised to treatment with CBD oral solution 500mg twice daily, or a matching placebo for 6 weeks, as an adjunct to their existing antipsychotic treatment. By using a battery of clinical outcome assessments, the trial will also assess several biomarkers to determine if they can be used to predict clinical outcomes and response to treatment with CBD. Biomarkers are being assessed as an exploratory outcome measure. Participants will be invited to provide blood and stool samples, and may be asked to complete neuroimaging assessments at certain eligible sites.

This study will be conducted to compare the efficacy of axatilimab versus placebo in combination with corticosteroids as initial treatment for moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD).

This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 active dose regimens of MORF-057 in adult study participants with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD).

The X-TOLE3 Phase 3 clinical trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of XEN1101 administered as adjunctive therapy in focal-onset seizures.

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of XEN1101 administered as adjunctive treatment in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS).

Patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) bear increased risk of cardiovascular events, which results in high morbidity and mortality among this cohort of patients. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH), which is an independent risk factor for mortality, occurs in up to 20% of hemodialysis session and may lead to myocardial stunning and cerebral ischemia resulting in increased white matter lesions, gastrointestinal ischemia and shunt vessel thrombosis. Due to the deleterious effects of IDH during HD, preventive measurements such as limiting interdialytic weight gain are recommended, but frequently fluid and salt restriction are not adhered to, thus increasing dialysis time or frequency of treatments is a common strategy in those patients.

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is an established treatment for Hymenoptera venom allergy and provides long-term protection from further generalized reactions in almost all patients. However, it is still unclear why bee VIT is less effective than vespid VIT. The preliminary data show that not only predominant Api m 10 sensitization but also other predominant sensitizations may be relevant as risk factors for treatment failure. Interestingly, all patients with a predominant Api m 10 sensitization who received bee VIT with a venom preparation with a supposed lack of Api m 10 tolerated sting challenges. Therefore, a multicenter study with a sufficient number of patients with treatment failure is urgently required, to clarify if predominant sensitization to a bee venom allergen is a risk factor for treatment failure. If predominant sensitization is a risk factor and caused by underrepresented components in bee venom preparations used for VIT, bee venom preparations may be optimized in the future and patients would benefit from a more effective VIT.