Clinical trials

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of atebimetinib in combination with modified GnP compared with SOC GnP alone.

The main aim of the study to describe the characteristics of participants with asthma across the spectrum of disease severity, including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment and disease burden, biomarkers, and both disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life. The study consists of two parts: a cross-sectional study, and a prospective follow-up evaluate changes in disease trajectories in participants with asthma.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is unresected and has a gene mutation called KRAS G12C. Researchers want to learn if calderasib (MK-1084) can be given with durvalumab, an immunotherapy, to treat NSCLC after chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The goal of this trial is to learn if participants who receive calderasib and durvalumab live longer without the cancer growing or spreading compared to participants who receive placebo and durvalumab.

This is an open-label, solid tumor, continuation, rollover trial which enrolls participants from ongoing BMS parent studies that evaluated adagrasib (MRTX849, BMS-986503) either as monotherapy or in combination with other cancer therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and other advanced solid tumors.

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate whether treatment with pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib leads to improved clinical outcomes compared to ruxolitinib alone in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (PET-MF) who have not previously received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy.

Phase I: Characterize safety and tolerability of GVV858 as a single agent and in combination with fulvestrant or letrozole. Identify dose range for optimization/recommended dose for further clinical evaluation. Phase II: Further characterize the safety and tolerability of GVV858 in combination with fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer.

Phase II study in participants with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) to evaluate efficacy and safety of AZD1163.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dosimetry and preliminary efficacy of \[177Lu\]Lu-DFC413 and safety and imaging properties of \[68Ga\]Ga-NNS309 in patients aged ≥ 18 years with solid tumors

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). ES-SCLC is a type of lung cancer that has spread throughout the lung, to the other lung, or to other parts of the body. A standard (usual) treatment for ES-SCLC uses both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. * Chemotherapy is a treatment that works to destroy cancer cells or stop them from growing. * Immunotherapy is a treatment that helps the immune system fight cancer. Gocatamig and I-DXd (short for ifinatamab deruxtecan) are study medicines. Researchers want to know if giving gocatamig and I-DXd together can treat ES-SCLC. Researchers will also look at giving the study medicines with standard treatment. Gocatamig is a T-cell engager therapy. I-DXd is an antibody drug conjugate. * T-cell engager therapy is a certain type of immunotherapy that uses T-cells to find and destroy cancer cells. * A T-cell is a type of white blood cell, which are cells that help the body fight infection. * An antibody drug conjugate (ADC) is a treatment that attaches to a protein on cancer cells and delivers treatment to destroy those cells. The goals of this study are to learn: * About the safety of combining gocatamig and I-DXd and if people tolerate them together * If people who receive gocatamig and I-DXd have ES-SCLC respond, which means the cancer gets smaller or goes away

The purpose of this phase Ib/II study is to (a) in Phase Ib evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMO959 when given in combination with lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan (also known as \[177Lu\]Lu-PSMA-617 or 177Lu-PSMA-617 and hereafter referred to as AAA617) with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) in participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have failed one prior ARPI and with or without prior taxane exposure, and (b) in Phase II evaluate the preliminary efficacy of AMO959 in combination with AAA617 and ARPI in participants with mCRPC who have failed one prior ARPI, but who have not yet been exposed to taxane treatment.

The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of R-mini-CHOP × 2 followed by AZD0486 compared with R-mini-CHOP × 6 in elderly or unfit participants newly diagnosed with LBCL.

This is a two-part, Phase I/II, open-label, global, multicenter study assessing the safety and efficacy of the combination of tulmimetostat (DZR123) and JSB462 (luxdegalutamide) versus standard of care in participants with progressive metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

The primary objective of the trial is to describe the long-term safety and tolerability of TEV-56286 administered orally for the treatment of adult participants with Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). A secondary objective of the trial is to further describe the safety and tolerability of TEV-56286. The planned total duration of the trial is approximately 100 weeks.

A Study of Izalontamab Brengitecan (BMS-986507) versus Platinum-Pemetrexed for EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after failure of EGFR TKI Therapy

This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, optimal dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BNT326 as monotherapy (Part 1) and as combination treatment with immunotherapeutic agents (Part 2) in participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors that are advanced (i.e., either metastatic or recurrent tumors with no further definitive treatment possible) and/or have relapsed/progressed after prior therapy.

This study is designed to demonstrate the efficacy and assess safety and tolerability of oral daily alpelisib in participants with PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS).

The objective of this study is to collect collect real-world data for the Ion endoluminal system.

This is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase 2b/3 study with an adaptive seamless design. The goal fo this study is to determine if an investigational drug, Zelpultide Alfa, can reduce the occurrence of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) in extremely premature babies. The study comprises 2 parts: * Part 1: Phase 2b, dose selection and exploratory efficacy and safety. * Part 2: Phase 3, confirmatory efficacy and safety. In Part 1, the study subjects will be randomized with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to either : 1. Standard of care + zelpultide alfa 4 mg/kg or, 2. Standard of care + zelpultide alfa 6 mg/kg or, 3. Standard of care + placebo (air-sham). In Part 1, all three arms will be evaluated descriptively to support dose selection based on safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy signals. Upon completion of Part 1, the DSMC will recommend which Phase 2b dose ("selected dose") to progress into Part 2 to the Study Steering Committee, which will decide the dose for Part 2 (Phase 3). A sample size reassessment will be performed after Part 1 completion. In Part 2, the selected dose of zelpultide alfa will be compared against placebo (air-sham) in a confirmatory analysis on the primary and key secondary endpoints. The study subjects will be randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio to either: 1. Standard of care + zelpultide alfa (selected dose from Part 1), or 2. Standard of care + placebo (air-sham). The main objective in part 2 is to compare the efficacy of zelpultide alfa added to standard of care versus standard of care plus placebo (air-sham) in terms of incidence of grade 2 and grade 3 bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and death in neonates at high risk for developing BPD. In both parts, treatment will be administered intratracheally. Participants will receive up to 7 administrations of zelpultide alfa at (4mg/kg or 6 mg/kg) or air-sham in 24 h intervals while the subjects are still intubated per standard of care.

The purpose of this substudy is to assess the efficacy and safety of ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd), given alone or with other treatments in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The goals of this study are to learn about: * The safety of the study treatment and if people tolerate it. * A safe dose level of I-DXd that can be used with other treatments. * Participant levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) during treatment.

This Phase II trial evaluates the optimization of the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) profile for glofitamab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx) followed by glofitamab monotherapy treatment regimen (Cohort A), and for glofitamab monotherapy (Cohort B) in participants with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The study utilizes an optimized steroid premedication regimen and monitoring schedule specifically designed to enable the administration of the treatment regimen in an outpatient setting.

This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized, clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of gedatolisib and palbociclib plus endocrine therapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

The purpose of this study is to assess plasma bimekizumab concentrations following subcutaneous (sc) bimekizumab administration.

DECIDE- Deep phenotyping for clinical inferring response in treatment resistant depression -Study Building upon the "Biobanking" initiative at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, the present project aims to identify clinically relevant subtypes of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) through Clinical Deep Phenotyping (CDP). According to clinical trials, 30-40% of the patients suffering from TRD benefit from lithium treatment. By collecting multimodal biological and clinical-diagnostic markers, such as structural and functional brain imaging via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), brain signals from electroencephalography, comprehensive blood tests, assessment of perception and cognition through neuropsychological testing, as well as the evaluation of specific depression symptoms and psychological and other comorbidities using standardized questionnaires, a bio-clinical signature will be identified using multivariate machine learning algorithms as an integration method. This signature aims to predict the response to lithium therapy in TRD. Prospectively, such an algorithm could later personalize the treatment decision of 'lithium administration in TRD'. This concept is in line with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIH) and aims to offer lithium therapy as a personalized treatment strategy for TRD. Specifically, this means that the likelihood of treatment response can be estimated before administration based on the results of the present study, thus enabling lithium to be offered specifically to those patients who are likely to benefit from it. The study design is non-interventional, meaning the decision for lithium treatment is made for patients according to clinical routine in accordance with the recommendation of the German National Treatment Guideline (NVL) independent of study enrollment. Study participation does not influence treatment decisions for the patients.

The main purpose of this study in participants with PIK3CA-mutated LyM is to assess the change in radiological response and symptom severity upon treatment with alpelisib film-coated tablets (FCT) as compared to placebo.

The purpose of this open-label, multicenter, phase IIIb, single-arm study is to characterize the efficacy and safety of the combination of ribociclib and standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) on invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), in a close to clinical practice patient population with HR-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-), Anatomic Stage Group III, IIB, and a subset of Stage IIA Early Breast Cancer (EBC).