Clinical trials

This is a Phase Ⅲ, randomized, open-label, Sponsor-blinded, 3-arm, global, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig in combination with fluoropyrimidine and T-DXd (Arm A) compared to trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and pembrolizumab (Arm B) in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma participants whose tumors express PD L1 CPS ≥ 1. Rilvegostomig in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy will be evaluated in a separate arm (Arm C) to assess the contribution of each component in the experimental arm.

This is a Phase 2 global, multi-center, open-label study to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of surovatamig (AZD0486) monotherapy in adult participants with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who have received at least two prior lines of therapies. The study has 2 Modules: Module 1 for FL and Module 2 for LBCL.

The purpose of this study is to determine the MTD of WGI-0301 in combination with Sorafenib for advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and assess its safety and efficacy in adults with advanced unresectable HCC who have previously received PD-1 / PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The primary objectives are to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants who receive sotorasib with platinum doublet chemotherapy versus participants who receive pembrolizumab with platinum doublet chemotherapy.

The goal of this randomised open-label controlled study is to compare the biochemical and clinical responses following \[11C\]Metomidate-PET CT(MTO-PET) versus usual care with adrenal venous sampling as first lateralisation strategy in people with biochemically confirmed primary aldosteronism(PA). The main question it aims to answer is: what is the proportion of people who achieved complete or partial clinical success among those who underwent PA treatment?

Background: Hypertension (HT) is the most common condition worldwide, predisposing to atherosclerotic disease. However, most HT patients have suboptimal BP control despite anti-HT medications. Isometric resistance exercise (IRE) (e.g. wall squat) may improve BP control, characterized by sustained muscle contraction with minimal change in muscle length and joint angle. Most randomized trials of IRE are short duration and their long-term effects on BP and atherosclerotic complications, particularly in the Chinese, remain unknown. Study objectives: (i) To evaluate the impact of IRE on atherogenesis surrogates (brachial flow-mediated dilation, FMD and carotid intima-media thickness IMT). (ii) To evaluate the impact of IRE on mechanisms of atherogenesis improvement, inflammatory parameters, arterial wall stiffness and biochemical profiles. Setting: Randomized samples of 200 HT patients, aged \>18years with systolic BP 135-160mHg while on no or stable anti-HT medications. Design: Randomized controlled IRE trial - stratified randomization with randomization block size of 4. 1. 100 patients for wall squat exercise of 14 mins each session (2 mins IRE x 4 sets, 2 mins rest in between), 3 sessions per week, for 1 year, plus advice on healthy diet and lifestyle. 2. 100 control patients (usual care) with advice on diet and healthy lifestyles and simple stretching exercise programme for 1 year. Main outcome measures: 1. Brachial FMD and carotid IMT at baseline, 24 weeks and 1 year. (primary outcome) 2. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at baseline and 24 weeks. (secondary outcome) 3. Important atherosclerosis risk factor parameters at baseline, 24 weeks and 1 year - including fasting serum glucose, lipid profiles, HgbA1-C, creatinine, hs-CRP, CBP, fibrinogen, and interleukin 6 (IL-6). (secondary outcome) 4. Safety profiles (if any) including CVS event and hospitalization at 1 year. Expected results: A group absolute difference in FMD of 1%, and in carotid IMT of 0.06mm between IRE intervention and control groups. Implications: IRE as suggested will be beneficial to management of HT for atherosclerosis preventions.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat types of breast cancer that are both: * High-risk, which means the cancer may have a higher chance of getting worse or coming back after treatment * Early-stage, which means the cancer is in the breast or the lymph nodes around the breast The 2 types of breast cancer in this study are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-low positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer. These cancers have zero or a low amount of a protein called HER2 and other proteins that attach to the hormones estrogen or progesterone. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (also known as sac-TMT or MK-2870), the study medicine, is a type of targeted therapy. A targeted therapy is a treatment that works to control how specific types of cancer cells grow and spread. The main goals of this study are to learn if people who receive sac-TMT, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy: * Have fewer cancer cells found in the tumors and lymph nodes removed during surgery compared to those who receive only pembrolizumab and chemotherapy * Live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back compared to people who receive only pembrolizumab with chemotherapy

Researchers want to know if sacituzumab tirumotecan given alone or with pembrolizumab can treat triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The main goal of this study is to learn if people treated with sacituzumab tirumotecan alone or with pembrolizumab live longer overall or without the cancer growing or spreading compared to people treated with chemotherapy.

Interventions for parents of children with NDD face two pivotal challenges. Firstly, many overlook the consequential influence of parenting stress, symptoms of parental anxiety and depression on the well-being of parent-child dyads. Though some address parenting stress, they fall short of considering comprehensive health outcomes. Secondly, current evidence has supported ACT as an empirically validated, transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic intervention for parents with dual benefits for the parent-child dyads, but the treatment delivery (e.g., group-based and guided online approaches) is primarily in-person, demanding the presence of expert personnel in every session, limiting its scalability and accessibility. Unlike other psychotherapies like CBT and mindfulness, conventional ACT sessions often adopt a 'one-size-fits-all' strategy, using standardised and pre-packed exercises lacking the personalisation necessary to address individual variations in psychological inflexibility. Leveraging our available innovation, Pai.ACT, an AI-driven chatbot adopting the Focused ACT approach, seeks to offer personalised and scalable mental health solutions for Chinese-speaking parents of NDD children. With our encouraging preliminary data supporting our pre-trained NLP model's accuracy and Pai.ACT's feasibility, the investigators propose to examine Pai.ACT in a full-scale clinical trial. The study will examine the following research questions: 1. Is Pai.ACT more effective than positive parenting advice for reducing parenting stress (primary outcome for parents) of parents and the emotional and behavioural symptoms of their young children with NDD (primary outcome for children) over the 12-month post-intervention follow-up? 2. Is Pai.ACT more effective than positive parenting advice for reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety, improving parental psychological flexibility and parenting behaviour over the 12-month post-intervention follow-up? 3. Is Pai.ACT more effective than positive parenting advice for reducing the use of healthcare and rehabilitation services in children with NDD over the 12-month post-intervention follow-up? 4. What are the perceived benefits, satisfaction, strengths, and limitations of Pai.ACT from the parents' perspectives?

This study aims to test the efficacy of a 6-session conditioning paradigm by investigating the conditioning-induced change in the socio-affective processing, loneliness, depressive symptoms, and neural correlates of lonely adults.

Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific genetic changes called human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations. Advanced NSCLC means lung cancer that has spread nearby or to other parts of the body or is unlikely to be controlled with current treatments. HER2 is a protein that helps cells to grow and divide. Sometimes, cancer cells have a damaged HER2 gene. This is called a mutation. This mutation can lead to an abnormal HER2 protein which may cause cancer cells to grow and divide too quickly. The study treatment, sevabertinib, is designed to block the mutated HER2 protein and may help slow or stop the cancer from growing. The main purpose of this study is to find out how well sevabertinib works and how safe it is, compared with standard treatment in participants with advanced NSCLC with a HER2 mutation. The study participants will receive one of the study treatments: * Sevabertinib as a tablet taken by mouth twice a day * Standard approved treatment for this condition given by infusion into a vein every 21 days Participants will continue their assigned treatment for as long as they benefit from it and do not experience severe side effects, or until they or their doctor decide to stop treatment. When a participant assigned to the standard treatment has their cancer gets worse, they may have the opportunity to switch to receive sevabertinib. This switch is called a crossover. Participants who switch to sevabertinib will continue this treatment until their disease gets worse again, they have side effects that are too severe, or they or their doctor decide to stop treatment. During the study, the research team will: * do scans such as CT, PET, MRI, or X-rays to check the cancer * Check the overall health of the participants by performing tests such as blood and urine tests and checking heart health using an electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. * do pregnancy tests when needed * ask how the participants are feeling and whether they have had any adverse events or other health problems An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events, irrespective if they think it is related or not to the study treatment.

This is a randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sacituzumab tirumotecan (MK-2870) in combination with pembrolizumab compared to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in participants with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received neoadjuvant therapy and did not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery. The primary objective is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab to TPC (pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus capecitabine) with respect to invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) per investigator assessment. It is hypothesized that sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab is superior to TPC with respect to iDFS per investigator assessment.

This study will assess if adding sacituzumab tirumotecan with pembrolizumab after surgery is effective in treating NSCLC for participants not achieving pathological complete response. The primary hypothesis of this study is sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab monotherapy with respect to disease free survival (DFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR).

This phase II trial tests the addition of BMS-986016 (relatlimab) to the usual immunotherapy after initial treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer that has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent) or that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Relatlimab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. The usual approach of treatment is initial treatment with chemotherapy such as the combination of cisplatin (or carboplatin) and gemcitabine, along with immunotherapy such as nivolumab. After the initial treatment is finished, patients may continue to receive additional immunotherapy. Carboplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works in a way similar to the anticancer drug cisplatin, but may be better tolerated than cisplatin. Carboplatin works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy drug that blocks the cells from making deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and may kill cancer cells. Giving BMS-986016 in addition to the usual immunotherapy after initial treatment may extend the time without the tumor cells growing or spreading longer than the usual approach in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.

This phase III trial compares stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), (five treatments over two weeks using a higher dose per treatment) to usual radiation therapy (20 to 45 treatments over 4 to 9 weeks) for the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. SBRT uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method may kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period of time. This trial is evaluating if shorter duration radiation prevents cancer from coming back as well as the usual radiation treatment.

The purpose of this Phase 2/3, randomized, multisite, open-label, dose confirmation, and expansion study is to evaluate the safety, and efficacy of zilovertamab vedotin (ZV) in combination with standard of care options for the treatment of rrDLBCL. This study will be divided into 2 parts: Dose Confirmation (Part 1) and Efficacy Expansion (Part 2) and will enroll participants who are at least 18 years of age with rrDLBCL. The hypotheses are: ZV in combination with rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is superior to R-GemOx with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Lugano response criteria by blinded independent review committee (BICR); and that ZV in combination with bendamustine rituximab (BR) is superior to BR with respect to PFS per Lugano response criteria by BICR. With protocol amendment 4 (effective: 04-April-2024), enrollment in Cohort B (study arms Bendamustine Rituximab \[BR\] and ZV + BR) is discontinued. No efficacy outcome analysis and hypothesis testing will be conducted for Cohort B.

This study aims to address the unmet medical need of participants with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have previously been treated with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, a fluoropyrimidine, and bevacizumab, by demonstrating an overall survival prolongation with precemtabart tocentecan (Precem-TcT) as single agent or Precem-TcT in combination with bevacizumab compared to trifluoride/tipiracil (FTD-TPI) plus bevacizumab.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ADX-324 in participants with Type 1 or Type 2 hereditary angioedema. The study will also evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and health-related quality of life measures.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a condition where the immune system mistakenly destroys platelets, which are cells that help stop bleeding. This leads to a lower number of platelets, making it easier to bruise or bleed. The main aim of this study is to check how safe mezagitamab is and how well it is tolerated by adults with chronic primary ITP, if given over a longer time. Other aims are to learn how effective treatment with mezagitamab is and how the body processes it (called pharmacokinetics or PK) over a longer time. Participants of the following previous mezagitamab studies will be invited to join this continuation study: TAK-079-3002 and TAK-079-1004. In this continuation study, participants will receive mezagitamab when certain protocol criteria are met. During the study, participants will visit their study clinic several times.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Researchers have designed a study medicine called ifinatamab deruxtecan (also called I-DXd or MK-2400) to treat mCRPC. The goal of this study is to learn if people who receive I-DXd live longer overall and live longer without the cancer growing or spreading than people who receive chemotherapy.

Conventional treatment options for localized prostate cancer include prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active surveillance. However, prostatectomy and radiotherapy carry certain degree of morbidity, including the risks of urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and injury to the structures in the proximity. Active surveillance carries the risk of disease progression and psychological distress to the patients. Focal therapy employs the concept of only destroying the significant lesion, resulting in disease cure and improved functional outcome. Among the different options of focal therapy, Irreversible electroporation has evolved over the past decades and can be a reliable treatment option. Our study aims at assess the safety and effectiveness of such treatment in prostate cancer management.

Background Reperfusion therapies, i.e., intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), are most effective treatments in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. The benefits of reperfusion therapies, however, may be reduced by treatment delays due to tests and examinations and logistic issues. Emergency Stroke Unit (ESU), a new concept of stroke unit locating at the Accident and Emergency Department (AED), equipped with a mobile, low-field MR imaging (lfMRI) scanner for fast diagnosis of ischemic stroke, differentiation of intracranial hemorrhage and identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO), is being tested in Mainland China. It may shorten the door-to-needle time (DNT) for IVT and door-to-groin puncture time (DPT) for EVT, which may hance associate with improved functional outcomes of AIS patients. This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ESU workflow using lfMRI in shortening the DNT/DPT and improving functional outcomes in AIS patients, who are eligible for IVT and/or EVT and can be treated within 6 hours after onset, compared with standard practice in Hong Kong; to reveal the changes in the ischemic lesions over a few days after IVT/EVT in these patients, with serial follow-up lfMRI exams.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if zilovertamab vedotin with standard treatment can help people live longer without the cancer growing or spreading than people who receive standard treatment alone.

An event-driven, Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BDA MDI compared with AS MDI in reducing the risk of a severe asthma exacerbation in symptomatic Chinese adults with asthma.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants from previous Merck pembrolizumab-based parent studies who transition into this extension study. This study will consist of three phases: 1) First Course Phase, 2) Survival Follow-up Phase or 3) Second Course Phase. Each participant will transition to this extension study in one of the following three phases, depending on the study phase they were in at the completion of the parent study. Participants who were in the First Course Phase of study treatment with pembrolizumab or lenvatinib in their parent study will enter the First Course Phase of this study and complete up to 35 doses or more every 3 weeks (Q3W) or 17 doses or more every 6 weeks (Q6W) of study treatment with pembrolizumab or a pembrolizumab-based combination or lenvatinib according to arm assignment. Participants who were in the Follow-up Phase in the parent study (post-treatment or Survival Follow-up Phase) will enter the Survival Follow-up Phase of this study. Participants who were in the Second Course Phase in their parent study will enter Second Course Phase of this study and complete up to 17 doses Q3W or 8 doses Q6W of study treatment with pembrolizumab or a pembrolizumab-based combination according to arm assignment. Any participant originating from a parent trial where crossover to pembrolizumab was permitted upon disease progression may be eligible for 35 doses as Q3W or 17 doses Q6W of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years), if they progress while on the control arm and pembrolizumab is approved for the indication in the country where the potential eligible crossover participant is being evaluated.