Clinical trials

A Study of Izalontamab Brengitecan (BMS-986507) versus Platinum-Pemetrexed for EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after failure of EGFR TKI Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether \[225Ac\]Ac-PSMA-617 (AAA817), given for up to 6 cycles at a dose of 10 Megabecquerel (MBq) +/- 10%, plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), improves the radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) compared to investigator's choice of standard of care (SOC) (ARPI change or taxane-based chemotherapy or \[177Lu\]Lu-PSMA-617 (AAA617)) in adult participants with PSMA-positive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with another ARPI as last treatment and who have not been exposed to a taxane-containing chemotherapy in the mCRPC setting nor have received any prior PSMA-targeting radioligand therapy.

This is a first-in-human Phase I/II, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and expansion study designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of GDC-7035 as a single agent and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies in participants with advanced or metastatic solid tumors that harbor the KRAS G12D mutation.

The Phase 2 portion of this study evaluates the efficacy and safety of MRTX849 monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in cohorts of patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation and any PD-L1 TPS and who are candidates for first-line treatment. The Phase 3 portion of the study compares the efficacy of adagrasib in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation and PD-L1 TPS \>=50% and who are candidates for first line treatment.

The Expanded Access Program will provide an alternate mechanism for these patients, who lack satisfactory therapeutic alternatives and cannot participate in a zidesamtinib clinical trial, to access investigational zidesamtinib. Following FDA Approval of zidesamtinib on 22 July 2026, the Expanded Access Program is closed in the United States (US); however, it remains open at all non-US sites listed on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). ESCC is a type of cancer that starts in certain cells that line the esophagus. The esophagus is the tube that connects the throat to the stomach. This study will look at ESCC that is either locally advanced unresectable, which means it has spread into tissue near where it started and cannot be completely removed by surgery, or metastatic, which means it has spread to other body parts. Available treatments for these types of ESCC include pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab is an immunotherapy, which is a treatment that helps the immune system fight cancer. Chemotherapy is medicine that destroys cancer cells or stops them from growing. Researchers want to learn about giving pembrolizumab and investigational agents, with or without chemotherapy to treat ESCC. Ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd), is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). An ADC attaches to a protein on cancer cells and delivers treatment to destroy those cells. The main goal of this study is to learn about the safety of investigational agents and pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy and if people tolerate them. Researchers also want to learn how cancer responds (gets smaller or goes away) to the study treatments.

Multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 study designed to demonstrate that neladalkib (NVL-655) is superior to alectinib in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naïve, Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) positive, advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

The purpose of this up to 6-year extension study is the evaluation of the efficacy and safety 1. after study treatment withdrawal in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) who achieved response (complete renal response \[CRR\] or partial renal response \[PRR\]) on double-blind treatment at the end of the SIRIUS-LN core study, and 2. of open-label ianalumab 300 mg treatment in patients who, at the end of the SIRIUS-LN core study, were either already receiving ianalumab open-label treatment or did not meet CRR/PRR criteria on double-blind treatment at the end of the SIRIUS-LN core study.

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of inavolisib in combination with Phesgo (pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and rHuPH20 injection for subcutaneous use) compared with placebo in combination with Phesgo, as maintenance therapy, after induction therapy in participants with previously untreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC).

This is a Phase 1/2, multicenter, randomized, open-label umbrella platform study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of investigational agents with or without pembrolizumab and/or chemotherapy, for the treatment of participants with second line (2L) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have previously been exposed to PD-1/PD-L1 based treatment.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sonrotoclax as monotherapy and in various combinations in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) and chromosomal translocation t(11;14). The study investigates sonrotoclax alone and in combination with dexamethasone and other agents, including carfilzomib, daratumumab, and pomalidomide.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants from previous Merck pembrolizumab-based parent studies who transition into this extension study. This study will consist of three phases: 1) First Course Phase, 2) Survival Follow-up Phase or 3) Second Course Phase. Each participant will transition to this extension study in one of the following three phases, depending on the study phase they were in at the completion of the parent study. Participants who were in the First Course Phase of study treatment with pembrolizumab or lenvatinib in their parent study will enter the First Course Phase of this study and complete up to 35 doses or more every 3 weeks (Q3W) or 17 doses or more every 6 weeks (Q6W) of study treatment with pembrolizumab or a pembrolizumab-based combination or lenvatinib according to arm assignment. Participants who were in the Follow-up Phase in the parent study (post-treatment or Survival Follow-up Phase) will enter the Survival Follow-up Phase of this study. Participants who were in the Second Course Phase in their parent study will enter Second Course Phase of this study and complete up to 17 doses Q3W or 8 doses Q6W of study treatment with pembrolizumab or a pembrolizumab-based combination according to arm assignment. Any participant originating from a parent trial where crossover to pembrolizumab was permitted upon disease progression may be eligible for 35 doses as Q3W or 17 doses Q6W of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years), if they progress while on the control arm and pembrolizumab is approved for the indication in the country where the potential eligible crossover participant is being evaluated.

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with 30-60% of survivors remaining unable to use their affected arms after discharge. Existing rehabilitation approaches such as motor imagery, robotic assistance, and neuromodulation have shown limited effectiveness for hand motor recovery. The Lifescapes system is a novel EEG-based brain-computer interface that combines motor imagery practice, biofeedback, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and robotic assistance to help post-stroke patients with severe hand paralysis. A recent clinical trial in 40 patients demonstrated promising improvements in motor function with the Lifescapes system, supporting its potential as a rehabilitation tool. This study aims to evaluate whether Lifescapes therapy delivered with reduced therapist supervision can improve upper-limb motor function in stroke patients, and whether such an approach is operationally feasible in the local clinical setting. 32 participants will be recruited from Alexandra Hospital and National University Hospital over 2 years. Participants must be aged 21-80, have had a stroke between 8 weeks and 5 years before enrolment, and have moderate to severe upper-limb impairment. They must be able to give informed consent and follow instructions. Participants are excluded if they are pregnant, have bilateral stroke, severe finger spasticity (MAS \>2), implanted stimulators or pacemakers, recent seizures within 90 days, or any unstable medical conditions. Participants will complete 16 sessions of Lifescapes BCI training over 4-8 weeks (2-4 sessions per week, approximately 30 minutes each). Therapist assistance will be progressively reduced based on each participant's ability, though a therapist remains present throughout. Each Lifescapes session is followed by a 30-minute GRASP session, a standardised self-directed arm and hand exercise programme prescribed by an occupational therapist. Participants will attend up to 21 visits over 5-6 months. Outcomes are assessed at 6 timepoints: pre-baseline (2-4 weeks before starting), baseline, after the 8th session, after the 16th session, and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up (the latter optional). Outcome measures include the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper extremity (FMA-UE), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), grip and pinch strength, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Motor Activity Log-14 (MAL-14), EQ-5D-5L quality of life measure, and optional TMS measurement of corticospinal excitability.

This is a prospective, single-arm, pilot study to assess effectiveness and tolerability of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) in managing neurogenic detrusor overactivity in spinal cord injury patients. 12 - 16 spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity will be recruited. The intervention includes administration of TTNS at the highest tolerated level for 20 minutes daily for 4 weeks, using a neuromodulation device -- Tensi+. Outcome measures including Urodynamic Study (UDS) will be retrieved or collected at baseline and collected after the 4 weeks of TTNS administration. Other outcome measures include Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-Q-SF), which will be administered before and after TTNS administration, subject's level of discomfort and any adverse events experienced by the subject will be recorded after each intervention session and a bladder diary will be recorded weekly for subjects not on indwelling urinary catheters. A TTNS satisfaction survey will also be performed at the end of the study.

This study tests whether a brain stimulation technique called tACS can help stroke patients recover movement in their affected arm. Patients receive either real or fake brain stimulation three times a week for about a month (12 sessions total). During each session, they wear a cap with electrodes that deliver mild electrical currents tailored to their individual brain patterns, while researchers monitor their brain activity. The study measures progress at three time points: before treatment, right after treatment, and one month later. Researchers use brain stimulation tests to check how well the brain controls muscles, and conduct physical tests to measure arm movement, muscle stiffness, and grip strength.

This study is testing whether a special type of brain stimulation called neuronavigated TMS can help reduce tinnitus (ringing in the ears). 50 people with tinnitus will each receive 20 treatment sessions - 10 real treatments and 10 sham treatments in random order, with a 2-week break between them. Before starting, participants get an MRI brain scan to guide where the stimulation device is placed. Questionnaires of measuring tinnitus severity will be asked four times throughout the study to determine to check the effect of TMS on treating tinnitus.

This is a clinical study that has three parts. It is testing a potential new medicine called Sofetabart Mipitecan (Sofe-M) for people with certain types of ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancers. Part A enrolls participants with platinum-resistant cancer, meaning their disease progressed during or within six months of platinum-based chemotherapy. Parts B and C enroll participants with platinum-sensitive cancer, whose disease responded and remained controlled for at least six months after completing platinum treatment. The researchers want to find out if Sofe-M works better than the standard treatments that doctors use now and to better understand how safe it is. Each participant's time in the study will depend on how they respond to the treatment.

The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) in participants receiving xaluritamig plus abiraterone against investigator's choice (docetaxel, cabazitaxel, or abiraterone).

This is a two-part, Phase I/II, open-label, global, multicenter study assessing the safety and efficacy of the combination of tulmimetostat (DZR123) and JSB462 (luxdegalutamide) versus standard of care in participants with progressive metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Beamion LUNG-3 study evaluates whether zongertinib, an oral HER2-targeted treatment, can improve outcomes compared with standard adjuvant treatment in adults with completely resected Stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors have activating HER2 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations. Eligible participants must have undergone curative-intent surgery and received guideline-appropriate perioperative systemic therapy, either neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy, or adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive zongertinib or standard of care, which may consist of approved adjuvant immunotherapy or active surveillance, based on local practice guidelines. The main purpose of the study is to determine whether zongertinib can prolong disease-free survival compared to standard treatment. Safety and patient-reported outcomes are also assessed.

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of Tersolisib (LY4064809/STX-478) to other anti-cancer drugs as first treatment for advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Participants can remain in the study as long as the drug is helping the cancer without unbearable side effects.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of muvalaplin in reducing cardiovascular risk in participants with high lipoprotein(a) who have cardiovascular disease or are at risk of a heart attack or stroke.

The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of empasiprubart in adults with CIDP. The study consists of a part A where participants will either receive empasiprubart or placebo for 24 weeks (6 months). Following part A, participants will enter part B in which all participants will receive empasiprubart for 96 weeks (24 months). More information can be found here: https://clinicaltrials.argenx.com/emnergize

This study is designed to learn if enlicitide decanoate is safe and effective to treat children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and high amounts of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the blood. The goals of this study are to learn about the safety of enlicitide and if children tolerate it, what happens to enlicitide in a child's body over time, and if enlicitide works to lower cholesterol levels in children more than a placebo.

Researchers are looking for other ways to treat locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is unresectable and has a gene mutation called KRAS G12C. Standard (or usual) treatments for this type of colorectal cancer may include mFOLFOX6 with or without bevacizumab. Researchers want to learn if adding calderasib (the study medicine) and cetuximab to mFOLFOX6 can treat locally advanced or mCRC with the KRAS G12C mutation. Calderasib and cetuximab are targeted therapies. The goals of this study are to learn: * About the safety of calderasib with cetuximab and mFOLFOX6 and if people tolerate the treatments * If people who receive calderasib with cetuximab and mFOLFOX6 live longer without mCRC growing or spreading compared to people who receive mFOLFOX6 with or without bevacizumab.