Clinical trials

This Phase IIb dose-ranging study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of AZD6793 compared with placebo tablets in participants with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Multi-center, open-label roll-over post-trial access protocol to provide remibrutinib treatment and collect long-term safety for up to three years for participants who are currently receiving remibrutinib treatment in a Novartis-sponsored study, who are benefiting from treatment with remibrutinib, and are unable to access remibrutinib treatment outside of a clinical study.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sonesitatug vedotin in combination with capecitabine with or without rilvegostomig in first-line (1L) Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The purpose of this up to 6-year extension study is the evaluation of the efficacy and safety 1. after study treatment withdrawal in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) who achieved response (complete renal response \[CRR\] or partial renal response \[PRR\]) on double-blind treatment at the end of the SIRIUS-LN core study, and 2. of open-label ianalumab 300 mg treatment in patients who, at the end of the SIRIUS-LN core study, were either already receiving ianalumab open-label treatment or did not meet CRR/PRR criteria on double-blind treatment at the end of the SIRIUS-LN core study.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of s.c. ianalumab administered in participants with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis relative to placebo

This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to investigate CV outcomes with elecoglipron compared with placebo, in adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)/heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), irrespective of T2DM status, and who are on background dapagliflozin in addition to other background standard of care.

This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multicenter study to investigate outcomes with elecoglipron compared with placebo in participants with CKD with and without T2DM who are on background SGLT2i (dapagliflozin) as GDMT and other SoC treatments for CKD.

This study aims to compare the effects of diode laser and light-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation on maxillary canine retraction during fixed orthodontic treatment. Participants requiring bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction will receive both interventions using a split-mouth design. One maxillary canine will receive diode laser photobiomodulation, while the contralateral maxillary canine will receive LED photobiomodulation. Maxillary canine movement will be evaluated at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks during retraction to compare the amount and rate of tooth movement between the two interventions. Pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement will also be assessed. Pulp oxygen saturation (SpO₂) of the maxillary canines will be measured to evaluate changes in pulpal oxygenation during orthodontic canine retraction. SpO₂ will be assessed at baseline and at predefined follow-up time points, including 20 minutes, 24 hours, 7 days, and 4 weeks. Changes in SpO₂ will be compared between the diode laser and LED sides. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be used to evaluate changes in maxillary canine root length and alveolar bone dimensions before and after canine retraction. The study is expected to determine whether diode laser and LED photobiomodulation differ in their effects on orthodontic canine retraction, pulpal oxygenation, pain, and associated dental and alveolar bone changes.

This Vietnam-based observational study examines ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1/cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (ENPP1/cGAS) protein and stromal fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression in multiple solid tumor samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The study involves no investigational treatments or participant-facing procedures. Tumor samples used in this study consist exclusively of archived formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded (FFPE) tumor samples that were collected as part of routine clinical diagnosis or treatment and for which all required procedures for standard clinical care have been completed. Only archived tumor samples obtained from routine clinical care will be included in this study. No additional biopsy, surgical resection, or specimen collection will be performed for research purposes, and no sample will be diverted prior to completion of clinical requirements. All included archived tumor samples will undergo ENPP1, cGAS, and FAP IHC analysis according to the procedures specified in the Laboratory Manual.

This randomized, rater-blinded clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive cTBS targeting either the right posterior parietal cortex (R-PPC) or the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (R-DLPFC). Participants may be psychotropic-medication naïve or may continue stable psychotropic medication according to the protocol-defined medication stability criteria. The primary objective is to compare changes in anxiety symptom severity, measured using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), from baseline to the end-of-treatment assessment. Secondary and exploratory assessments include treatment response and remission, quality of life, sleep quality, cognitive function, safety and tolerability, resting electroencephalography (EEG), and transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with EEG (TMS-EEG).

This randomized, rater-blinded clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with standard iTBS in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either accelerated or standard iTBS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants may be psychotropic-medication naïve or may continue stable psychotropic medication according to the protocol-defined medication stability criteria. The accelerated iTBS group will receive 45 treatment sessions over approximately 15 treatment days, while the standard iTBS group will receive 20 treatment sessions over 4 weeks. The primary objective is to compare changes in depressive symptom severity, measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17), from baseline to the end-of-treatment assessment. Secondary and exploratory assessments include treatment response and remission, sleep quality, quality of life, cognitive measures, safety and tolerability, resting electroencephalography (EEG), and transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with EEG (TMS-EEG).

TROPION-Lung17 will measure the efficacy and safety of datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) compared with docetaxel in patients with trophoblast cell surface protein 2 (TROP2) positive advanced or metastatic lung cancer without actionable genomic alterations (AGA).

This study is open to adults with type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. People can join the study if they have these conditions and do not have a history of heart failure. The purpose of this study is to find out if a medicine called vicadrostat, when taken with empagliflozin, helps reduce cardiovascular risk in people with these conditions. The study will compare this combination to a placebo version of vicadrostat with empagliflozin. Participants are put into 2 groups randomly, which means by chance. One group takes vicadrostat and empagliflozin tablets, and the other group takes placebo tablets with empagliflozin. Placebo tablets look like vicadrostat tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take a tablet once per day for 2 and a half years and up to 4 years and 3 months. All participants also continue their medication for type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. Participants have an equal chance of receiving the study medicine or placebo. Participants are in the study for up to 4 years and 3 months. During this time, they visit the study site regularly. During these visits, doctors collect information about participants' health and take blood samples. The doctors document when participants experience cardiovascular events. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

This study is open to adults with chronic heart failure (HF) who have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 40%. People can join the study if they have been diagnosed with chronic HF at least 3 months before they start on the study. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called vicadrostat, in combination with another medicine called empagliflozin, helps people with chronic heart failure. In this study, participants are put into 2 groups randomly. Participants have an equal chance of being in either group. One group takes vicadrostat/empagliflozin tablets, and the other group takes placebo/empagliflozin tablets. Placebo tablets look like vicadrostat tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take the study medicines as tablets once a day for between about 6 months and about 3.5 years. During this time, they can continue their regular treatment for heart failure. Participants can stay in the study as long as they benefit from treatment and can tolerate it, for a maximum of about 3.5 years. During this time, they visit the study site regularly. The exact number of visits is different for each participant, depending on how long they stay in the study. The study staff may also contact the participants by phone for some visits. Participants also regularly answer questions about their well-being. The doctors document when participants experience worsening of their heart failure symptoms, go to hospital due to heart failure or die during the study. The time until these events are observed is compared between the two treatment groups to see whether the treatment works. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

This is a Phase III, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded, 3-arm, multicentre, global study assessing the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig in combination with bevacizumab with or without tremelimumab compared to atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab. This study will be conducted in participants with advanced HCC who are not amenable to curative therapy or locoregional therapy

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adults with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

The main purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of volrustomig compared to observation in participants with unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) who have not progressed after receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT).

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of serious game-based learning compared with conventional learning in improving clinical reasoning among nursing students in Vietnam. Additionally, the study will assess students' self-confidence in pediatric nursing care, intrinsic motivation, and satisfaction with the learning experience. A minimum of 104 second-year nursing students will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (serious game-based learning) or the control group (conventional learning). Both groups will receive six teaching sessions based on the content of the Pediatric Care Nursing curriculum, conducted outside the formal curriculum, with each session lasting approximately three hours. Outcomes will be measured at multiple time points, while learning satisfaction will be assessed immediately after completion of the intervention.

Acute kidney injury is a common complication after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and is associated with prolonged intensive care unit stay, increased morbidity, and mortality. Fluid overload and venous congestion are increasingly recognized as important contributors to postoperative organ dysfunction. The VExUS score is a bedside ultrasound tool that assesses systemic venous congestion through evaluation of the inferior vena cava and Doppler flow patterns in the hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins. Although previous studies have suggested an association between VExUS-assessed venous congestion, AKI, and adverse outcomes, evidence regarding its relationship with advanced hemodynamic parameters remains limited. This prospective observational study will enroll adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. All patients will undergo postoperative VExUS assessment and will be followed for the development of AKI and other postoperative complications. A predefined subgroup of patients undergoing clinically indicated PiCCO monitoring will additionally be evaluated to determine the association between VExUS score and PiCCO-derived hemodynamic parameters. The findings may support the use of VExUS as a noninvasive bedside tool for assessing venous congestion and identifying patients at increased risk of postoperative organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of elecoglipron, compared with placebo in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and impaired renal function, who are or will be on a background of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) dapagliflozin 10 mg as per guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Additionally, participants are on other glucose-lowering medication(s).

Nerandomilast is being developed to help people with systemic sclerosis by potentially improving symptoms and slowing disease progression. This study is open to adults who are at least 18 years old and have systemic sclerosis (SSc). People can join the study if they have limited or diffuse cutaneous SSc with disease onset within 7 years of the first non-Raynaud's symptom. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called nerandomilast helps people with systemic sclerosis. This study also aims to find out how well nerandomilast is tolerated in people with systemic sclerosis. Participants are put into 2 groups randomly, which means by chance. One group takes nerandomilast tablets and the other group takes placebo tablets. Placebo tablets look like nerandomilast tablets but do not contain any medicine. Participants take the tablets twice a day. Participants are in the study for 1 to about 4 years. During this time, they visit the study site regularly and get phone calls from the site staff. During study visits participants regularly have blood samples taken and doctors check changes in skin thickening, lung function, and internal organs, overall health and the safety and tolerability of study treatment in people with SSc. The results are compared between the groups to see whether the treatment works. The doctors also regularly check participants' health and take note of any unwanted effects.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid conjugated with fibrinogen in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Knee osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease that causes pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility, significantly affecting quality of life. Hyaluronic acid injections are widely used to relieve symptoms, but their effectiveness may be limited in some patients. Fibrinogen has potential biological effects that may enhance tissue repair and anti-inflammatory responses. In this single-arm clinical study, patients with knee osteoarthritis will receive intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid conjugated with fibrinogen. Clinical outcomes, including pain relief, functional improvement, and adverse events, will be assessed during follow-up visits. The results of this study may provide additional evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of conjugating hyaluronic acid with fibrinogen for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that V181 is safe and well tolerated, elicits an immune response, and reduces the frequency of virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) of any severity, due to any of the 4 dengue serotypes, regardless of dengue serostatus at baseline in children 2 to 17 years of age.

Researchers are looking for new ways to treat types of breast cancer that are both: * High-risk, which means the cancer may have a higher chance of getting worse or coming back after treatment * Early-stage, which means the cancer is in the breast or the lymph nodes around the breast The 2 types of breast cancer in this study are triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor (HR)-low positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative breast cancer. These cancers have zero or a low amount of a protein called HER2 and other proteins that attach to the hormones estrogen or progesterone. Sacituzumab tirumotecan (also known as sac-TMT or MK-2870), the study medicine, is a type of targeted therapy. A targeted therapy is a treatment that works to control how specific types of cancer cells grow and spread. The main goals of this study are to learn if people who receive sac-TMT, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy: * Have fewer cancer cells found in the tumors and lymph nodes removed during surgery compared to those who receive only pembrolizumab and chemotherapy * Live longer without the cancer growing, spreading, or coming back compared to people who receive only pembrolizumab with chemotherapy

The primary objective of the study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan combined with pembrolizumab to pembrolizumab alone with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypothesis is that the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and pembrolizumab is superior to pembrolizumab alone with respect to OS.