Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

Patients with non-specific low back pain will be compared to healthy, age- and sex-matched controls to determine the most discriminating back muscle characteristics and to delineate possible phenotypes of patients with non-specific low back pain showing impaired proprioceptive postural control. Additionally, the group of patients with non-specific low back pain will receive a 16-week, high-load proprioceptive training program. The effects of this training program on the different back muscle characteristics and proprioceptive postural control will be evaluated.

Chronic low back pain represents a major public health issue, with an estimated prevalence of up to 23% in the adult population and a significant impact on quality of life and functional capacity. Among these patients, a significant proportion undergo spinal surgery-including laminectomy, discectomy, or spinal fusion-when conservative treatment has failed to provide adequate relief. Current treatment strategies involve functional spinal rehabilitation (FSR). Due to the multifaceted and complex pathophysiology of this chronic pain condition, we have previously addressed the spinal syndrome in terms of its functional and muscular component: the myofascial expression. In our clinical practice, we have introduced a minimally invasive paravertebral procedure, guided by ultrasound, targeting the fascia of the erector spinae muscles in the lower lumbar region. The goal of this procedure is to provide pain relief to the patient, enabling them to better adhere to the rehabilitative treatment (functional restoration of the spine) and ultimately improve the patient's quality of life within their environment. This evaluation of professional practices highlights a clear clinical indication in favor of infiltration of the erector spinae fascia, with a significant majority of patients reporting improved pain relief and better adherence to rehabilitation. Thus, within a coordinated, multidisciplinary care approach, this intervention appears to address patient expectations regarding comfort and leads us to consider the myofascial component of the complaint. The proposed paravertebral intervention is also appropriate in accordance with the updated recommendations, which are very restrictive in the context of a surgically treated spine (PSPS-2). This assessment of current practices justifies the implementation of a prospective controlled study. Through this study, we aim to investigate the treatment's effects and evaluate its pharmacological (via the anti-inflammatory action of corticosteroids) and mechanical (via needle-induced muscle stimulation) components.

Low back pain is the second most common reason for medical consultation in France and affects 60 to 80% of the working population. Patients with acute episodes of non-specific low back pain recover within 6 to 8 weeks, but recurrence is common and 7 to 10% of patients will experience persistent pain and disability for more than 3 months. Given their low efficacy and the risks associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioids (nearly 60% of all opioids prescribed in the United States), the scientific literature does not support the use of pharmacological treatments. The international recommendations strongly suggest using non-pharmacological therapies, including physical exercise, rehabilitation, and spinal manipulation.Spinal manipulation (SM) is a common choice of therapy in primary care. In the patient's imagination "getting manipulated when in pain leads to heavy use of these manual therapies in a medical (manual medicine and medical osteopathy) or non-medical setting (manual therapy, osteopathy, and chiropractic). However, the evidence of effectiveness is weak in the chronic phase (only in the short term) and contradictory for the acute or subacute phases of low back pain. Pain and function are improved at 6 weeks, but the results are not clinically relevant. There is a lack of evidence regarding efficacy because the trials on spinal manipulations are of poor quality. A meta-analysis has recently reported that SMs are associated with a very limited risk of harm, making them a reasonable treatment option. Therefore, it seems necessary to demonstrate the specific effect of MVs in order to justify their use in primary care, support their wider use around the world, and reinforce recommendations for non-pharmacological treatment of low back pain.

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar nerve block in addition to standard multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Fifty patients will be randomly assigned to receive either the retrolaminar block combined with standard pain management or standard pain management alone. The primary outcome is total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity at multiple time points, time to first rescue analgesia, duration of sensory block, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and chronic pain development at 3 and 6 months follow-up.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment works better for veterans with chronic neck or back pain. This study is comparing three treatments: Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and usual care (whatever a person is already doing to cope with their pain). The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Which treatment works better for lowering pain: PRT, CBT, or usual care? 2. How do the effects of PRT compare with CBT and usual care in terms of pain relief and other factors such as emotional functioning, quality of life, anxiety, and pain medication use? Participants will: 1. Be randomly assigned to receive either PRT, CBT, or usual care. 2. Complete questionnaires about their pain and health. 3. If in the PRT or CBT group, have nine weekly therapy sessions over video calls with a therapist.

This is a clinical study of patients who have low back pain (for at least 6 months). The goal is to understand, with brain imaging, how auriculotherapy (an acupuncture-like stimulation of the ear) may work to relieve pain. There are 4 total study visits, divided into two pairs of visits that occur before and 5-7 days after receiving either a real or sham auriculotherapy treatment. The cryo-IQ device will be used, to stimulate 7 small areas on both ears with a focused jet of cold as a small amount of compressed gas is released. This is generally not painful, and less invasive, compared to using needles for auriculotherapy.

This clinical trial seeks to provide high level of evidence on the efficacy of ActiveMatrix primarily on spinal surgical site infection rate.