Blood Transfusion

This multicenter observational study aims to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based precision transfusion prediction model for critically ill patients. The study will collect clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, transfusion-related information, physiological data, and clinical outcomes from critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units. An AI model will be developed using retrospective data and further evaluated using prospective observational data. The primary objective is to investigate factors associated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and establish a predictive model to support individualized transfusion management in critically ill patients.

In critically ill patients, optimized strategies for red blood cells transfusion (RBCT) are still controversial. Most recent guidelines suggest that clinical practice in ICU setting should follow a restrictive approach to RBCT (i.e., hemoglonim level \< 7.0 g/dL).In our previous study, oxygen extraction ratio (O2ER) has shown good performance as a marker to identify the correct timing for RBCT, potentially affecting 90-day mortality in non-bleeding, critically ill patients \[11\]. Moreover, our data suggested that an individualized strategy for RBCT may reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), which is possibly related to a better delivery of oxygen and organ perfusion.

This study compares two accepted ways of deciding when adults recovering from open-heart surgery should receive a blood transfusion in the intensive care unit. One approach gives a transfusion when the blood count (hemoglobin) falls below a fixed level that is the same for everyone. The other approach adds each patient's own physiology - such as oxygen levels and lactate - to help decide whether a transfusion is truly needed, within a safe range. The investigators want to learn whether the personalized approach is as safe as the standard approach for major outcomes after heart surgery, while reducing the amount of blood transfused. Participants may also choose to give blood and stool samples to a research biobank for future studies on recovery after cardiac surgery.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate how blood donors' lifestyle and nutritional status influence the quality of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) during storage and their impact on patient safety in transfused neonates and postpartum women. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Are donor lifestyle and nutritional profiles associated with the development of storage lesions in pRBCs? 2. Do these donor-related factors influence clinical outcomes after transfusion in neonates and postpartum women? 3. Are storage lesion in pRBCs associated with clinical outcomes in transfused neonates and postpartum women? Researchers will compare pRBC units stratified according to donor lifestyle and nutritional profiles to determine differences in storage lesion biomarkers and post-transfusion clinical outcomes.

Anemia is a condition in which there are not enough red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body. It is very common in extremely preterm infants (born before 28 weeks of pregnancy), and many of these babies require red blood cell transfusions during their hospital stay. Currently, transfusions are given using red blood cells donated by adults. An alternative option is to use red blood cells collected from umbilical cord blood, which may be more similar to a newborn's own blood. This approach has been used in some neonatal units with encouraging results and no reported safety concerns. This study aims to determine whether transfusion with umbilical cord blood improves clinical outcomes and reduces potential side effects compared to standard adult donor blood transfusion in extremely preterm infants. We hypothesize that umbilical cord blood transfusion will be at least as safe as adult donor blood and may provide clinical benefits. About 115 extremely preterm infants admitted to neonatal units in Catalonia will participate. If parents agree, their baby will be randomly assigned to receive either compatible umbilical cord blood or compatible adult donor blood if a transfusion becomes necessary. Babies will only receive a transfusion if they clinically need one. If cord blood is not available at the time of transfusion, the baby will receive compatible adult donor blood regardless of the assigned group. To evaluate the response to treatment, small blood samples will be collected at birth, at one month of life, and 24 hours after any transfusion. These samples are taken at the same times as routine blood tests, so participation does not require additional needle sticks. The amount of blood collected is minimal (about 0.2 mL per sample). In addition, a painless and non-invasive sensor will be placed on the baby's head for 24 hours to measure oxygen delivery to the brain. Urine samples will also be collected before and after transfusion to help assess how oxygen reaches body tissues. Participation will continue until the baby reaches 36 weeks of postmenstrual age or is discharged from the hospital, whichever comes first.

This study aims to learn more about blood management in children undergoing heart surgery, such as the right amounts, and the best blood products, to administer. It also aims to develop a mathematical model that may help researchers better predict and treat patients who need blood transfusions during heart surgery.

This study looks at patients with hip fractures who are taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), a type of blood thinner. In many hospitals, surgery for these patients is delayed because of concerns about bleeding, but waiting longer can also increase risks such as complications and longer hospital stays. The purpose of this study is to find out whether operating within 24 hours is as safe as delaying surgery beyond 24 hours. Specifically, the investigators want to know if early surgery does not lead to a higher need for blood transfusions compared to delayed surgery.

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if it is achievable to conduct a large-scale clinical trial whereby, the investigators will compare two ways of deciding when to give a blood transfusion during surgery. Participants in this study are adults undergoing surgery with a risk of significant blood loss. The main question it aims to answer is: * Is a trial designed to definitively test and compare two different red blood cell transfusion strategies feasible? Participants will: * Receive blood transfusions during surgery based on a higher (less than 90 g/L) or a lower (less than 70 g/L) hemoglobin value. * Complete questionnaires at 30 and 90 days after surgery.

Diarrhea is one of the leading causes of under-five childhood mortality and accounts for 8% of 5.4 million global under-5 deaths. The coexistence of sepsis and hypovolemic shock in children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) having diarrhea is common. At Dhaka hospital of icddr,b, the death rate is as high as 40% and 69% in children with severe sepsis and septic shock respectively with co-morbidities such as severe malnutrition. The conventional management of SAM children with features of severe sepsis recommended by WHO includes administration of boluses of isotonic saline followed by blood transfusion in unresponsive cases with septic shock; whereas the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guideline recommends vasoactive support. To date, no study has evaluated systematically the effects of inotrope(s) and vasopressor or blood transfusion in children with dehydrating diarrhea (for example, in cholera) and SAM having shock and unresponsive to WHO standard fluid therapy. This randomized trial will generate evidence whether inotrope and vasopressor or blood transfusion should be selected for severely malnourished children having hypotensive shock and who failed to respond to WHO standard fluid bolus.

Evaluating the differences between D2 and D3 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in patients with right cancer colon post-operative outcome, intra-operative blood transfusion, post-operative ICU admission, anastomotic leakage, lymph node harvesting in the final specimen, and six months follow up and overall survival time after 5-years