Chronic Hemodialysis

Metabolic acidosis is frequent in chronic hemodialysis patients and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Two commonly used strategies to correct acidosis are oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation and increasing the bicarbonate concentration of the dialysate, but their comparative effectiveness and tolerance in routine care remain uncertain. This pilot, prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial will compare oral sodium bicarbonate versus higher dialysate bicarbonate in chronic hemodialysis patients with metabolic acidosis, using predialysis plasma bicarbonate concentrations, so-called "reserves alcalines" or "alkaline reserves" in local laboratory reports, as a pragmatic marker of acid-base status. Approximately 30 acidotic patients (serum bicarbonate \< 22 mmol/L) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either oral sodium bicarbonate or an increase in dialysate bicarbonate for 6 weeks. An additional non-acidotic observational group will provide descriptive reference data. The primary outcome is the change in predialysis serum bicarbonate from baseline (Day 0) to Day 42 between the two randomized arms. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients reaching target serum bicarbonate levels, the weekly kinetics of correction, dialysis adequacy (Kt/V and online clearance monitoring), intradialytic tolerance (blood pressure, cramps, hypotension, symptoms), sodium-related safety (natremia, interdialytic weight gain), and the effects of acidosis correction on nutritional and bone-mineral metabolism, including changes in serum albumin, calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone (PTH). Feasibility indicators such as recruitment, retention, adherence to treatment and dialysate adjustment, and data completeness will also be described to inform the design of a larger definitive trial.

This randomized crossover clinical trial will compare regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) and standard heparin anticoagulation (HA) during postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) in chronic dialysis patients with end-stage kidney disease. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate biocompatibility during HDF by measuring markers of complement activation (C3a), platelet activation (PF4), and coagulation activation (thrombin-antithrombin complex, TAT). Secondary aims include comparison of solute removal efficiency, including beta-2 microglobulin, phosphate, and urea removal, as well as assessment of citrate, calcium, and magnesium kinetics during citrate anticoagulation. Twenty adult chronic dialysis patients will undergo two study HDF procedures in randomized order: one procedure using heparin anticoagulation and one procedure using regional citrate anticoagulation with a one-week interval between procedures. The study aims to improve understanding of the effects of anticoagulation methods on hemodiafiltration biocompatibility and dialysis efficiency and may contribute to optimization of citrate anticoagulation protocols in chronic hemodiafiltration patients.

The RDN-HD Study is a prospective, single-center feasibility study. All patients included will undergo endovascular ultrasound-based RDN (no sham group, no blinding). The purpose of the RDN-HD Study is to demonstrate that ultrasound-based RDN is safe in patients with TRH and ESRD hemodialysis and reduces 24-h ambulatory BP.