Chronic Ischemic Stroke

The suNR1se II Study is a Phase 2b randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of stereotactic intracerebral administration of CC-101 (f/k/a NR1), an investigational allogeneic neural stem cell therapy, in adults with chronic ischemic stroke and persistent motor impairment. The study is designed to assess whether administration of CC-101 immediately adjacent to the region of prior stroke injury may improve motor function recovery compared with a sham surgical control procedure. The study will also evaluate the role of short-term anti-rejection therapy with tacrolimus in subjects receiving CC-101. Approximately 36 participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ration to receive CC-101 plus tacrolimus, sham surgery (no CC-101) plus tacrolimus-matched placebo, or CC-101 plus tacrolimus-matched placebo. Participants will be followed for safety and functional outcomes for at least 12 months following the study procedure.

This study is for adults who have difficulty moving a few months after a stroke. In this study, ASP2246 will be given to people for the first time. This is known as a "first in human" study. The main aims of the study are to check the safety of ASP2246, how well people tolerate it, and to find suitable doses of ASP2246 to use later in this study and in future studies. This study has 2 parts. In Part 1, people will have brain surgery. During the surgery, different small groups of people will receive a lower to a higher dose of ASP2246. Each dose will be given slowly through a special tube to the damaged part of the brain (intracerebral parenchymal infusion). Any medical problems will be recorded at each dose. This is done to find suitable doses to use in Part 2 of the study. In Part 2, other different groups of people will undergo the same type of brain surgery. Some people will receive a higher dose of ASP2246, and some people will receive a lower dose of ASP2246. These are the doses from Part 1. Also, another group of people won't be given ASP2246 during brain surgery. This is known as a sham procedure. This is done so neither the people taking part in Part 2, nor the study doctors (apart from the surgeons) know who will be given ASP2246. After brain surgery, people will be observed for about 2 weeks. For people in Part 1, this will take place in the hospital. For people in Part 2, the observation in hospital may be longer or shorter, depending on the results from Part 1. People in both Parts 1 and 2 will have physical therapy for 12 weeks after surgery and continue to have safety checks for about 1 year after their brain surgery.

Vagal Nerve Stimulation is a novel proven therapy for patients with chronic ischemic stroke. The primary objective of this registry is to assess the safety of vagal nerve stimulation for stroke recovery through monitoring the occurrence of serious adverse events associated with the surgical procedure or subsequent paired rehabilitation protocol. This registry will monitor patients undergoing VNS for stroke recovery in the Mount Sinai Health System and collect clinical and procedural details, objective outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes associated with vagal nerve stimulation for stroke recovery.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of task-specific training with and without biofeedback compared to conventional physical therapy on balance and fall risk in chronic ischemic stroke patients in Lahore, Pakistan. Sixty-six participants will be randomly allocated into three groups: Group 1 (task-specific training with biofeedback), Group 2 (task-specific training without biofeedback), and Group 3 (conventional physical therapy). The intervention will span 12 weeks, consisting of 36 sessions. Key outcome measures include the Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test, and the Barthel Index. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up. The study hypothesizes that the use of biofeedback in task-specific training will produce significantly greater improvements in balance and reduced fall risk compared to conventional rehabilitation strategies. The study is being conducted at Shadman Medical Center in Lahore and is part of a PhD project from Lincoln University College.