Colorectal Anastomosis

Patients whom meet all eligibility criteria will be assigned random 1:1 to one of the following arms: * ECPS group: Echelon Circular™ Powered Stapler (n=270) * MCS Group: manual circular staplers (n=270) Patients will be followed during 30 days in order to evaluate the primary endpoint.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Signia™ power handle, Signia™ circular adapter, and Signia™ Tri-Staple™ 2.0 circular reloads (hereafter referred to as Signia™ circular stapler) in patients undergoing left sided colon, sigmoid, or rectal resections in a post market setting.

This study aims to evaluate whether giving oral antibiotics before elective colorectal surgery can improve recovery and reduce complications in children. Colorectal surgery is commonly performed in children for conditions such as Hirschsprung disease, anorectal malformations, and other bowel disorders. Because the large intestine normally contains many bacteria, these operations carry a higher risk of infection and other postoperative complications. Some surgeons prescribe oral antibiotics before surgery to reduce the number of bacteria in the bowel, while others do not use this approach routinely. In this study, children scheduled for elective colorectal surgery will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive oral antibiotics before surgery, while the other group will receive standard preparation without oral antibiotics. All children will otherwise receive the same surgical and postoperative care according to hospital guidelines. Researchers will compare the two groups for important outcomes including surgical site infection, leakage from the bowel connection (anastomotic leak), and length of hospital stay. Additional information regarding recovery and postoperative complications will also be collected. Participation in the study will not affect the quality of treatment provided. Parents or guardians may withdraw their child from the study at any time without affecting routine medical care. The results of this research may help determine whether preoperative oral antibiotics should be routinely used in children undergoing elective colorectal surgery and may contribute to improving surgical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of early regular feeding protocol vs conventional clear fluids regimen as per ERAS protocols in patients undergoing colorectal anastomosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Food tolerance and return of normal bowel Habbits. 2. Rate of Anastomotic leakage 3. Length of hospital stay

The goal of this observational multicenter study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a single-stapled technique (SST) for colorectal anastomosis and to explore whether this technique is associated with a reduced rate of anastomotic leakage compared with the conventional double-stapled technique (DST). The study includes adult patients undergoing planned left-sided colorectal resection with colorectal anastomosis, including sigmoid resection, left hemicolectomy, or partial mesorectal excision (PME), for benign or malignant disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the rate of anastomotic leakage within 90 days after surgery in patients operated with the single-stapled technique? Is the single-stapled technique feasible and safe across different surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted surgery) in a multicenter setting? Furthermore, outcomes after single-stapled anastomosis will be compared with a retrospective cohort of patients operated with the conventional double-stapled technique to explore potential differences in anastomotic leakage rates and postoperative complications. Participants will receive standard surgical care as determined by the treating surgical team. Patients included in the prospective part of the study will undergo colorectal anastomosis using the single-stapled technique as part of routine clinical practice. Data on perioperative variables, postoperative complications (including anastomotic leakage graded according to international consensus definitions), and follow-up outcomes will be collected prospectively using an electronic case report form (eCRF). A retrospective cohort from the same participating centers will be identified through medical record review using identical inclusion criteria. The results of this study are intended to provide robust multicenter data on the safety and clinical outcomes of the single-stapled technique and to serve as the basis for planning a future randomized controlled multicenter trial.

There are many indications for performing a fecal diversion stoma. In both scheduled and emergency situations, and whatever the context (indication or type of fecal diversion stoma), stomal complications can occur early (10-60%) or late (25%), and may require repeat surgery. The most frequent complications are necrosis, retraction, bleeding, evisceration, occlusion, abscess, hyperflow with hydroelectrolytic consequences, skin lesions, prolapse or eventration. What's more, a temporary stoma can become permanent. The positioning and fabrication of the digestive stoma for fecal diversion must therefore comply with well-defined criteria to reduce the risk of stomal complications and the difficulties of fitting the stoma, and thus improve the autonomy and therefore the quality of life of the ostomate patient. The guide to good stoma therapy practice recommends that the site of the future stoma should be marked out preoperatively. What's more, the psychological impact of a stoma is such that preoperative and regular postoperative education is essential. This identification and initiation of education is carried out by stoma nurses and/or surgeons. The impact of preoperative stoma identification and education on stoma complications, quality of life and patient autonomy has been reported in a few comparative series. The impact of preoperative education on quality of life has also been reported. However, despite this "Evidence Based Medicine", and the guide to good stoma therapy practice, the identification and education of the future fecal diversion stoma are not always carried out preoperatively. Reasons for this may include lack of time, lack of human resources, in the general context of a shrinking public hospital, or in the current context of distancing and dehumanization of the profession, or lack of conviction on the part of practitioners. To this end, the investigators would like to propose a prospective observational study aimed at evaluating the impact of identification and education prior to the performance of a fecal diversion stoma in a programmed situation on the one hand, and an emergency situation on the other. The main objective will be to compare quality of life specifically related to the stoma at 30 days postoperatively with the StomaQOL score, between 2 groups of patients: * unexposed group: no preoperative stoma identification and education * exposed group: preoperative stoma identification and education. This comparison will be stratified according to whether surgery is scheduled or emergency surgery. Total 100 patients : * In scheduled surgery: 30 exposed and 30 unexposed patients * In emergency surgery: 10 exposed and 30 unexposed patients Timeline: Inclusion period: 12 months Follow-up period: 12 months Total duration: 24 months

The aim of this study is to compare end to end anastomosis with omega suture versus end to anterior rectal wall in colorectal anastomosis as regard post operative anastomotic leakage, bowel function, operative time and intra operative blood loss.