Delphi Study

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is an established airway clearance technique for patients with chronic conditions like neuromuscular diseases. However, its use in critically ill ICU patients remains inconsistent and lacks standardized guidelines. Despite growing research, current practices vary widely in patient selection, treatment protocols, and safety management, with limited high-quality evidence to support clear recommendations. To address this gap, an international, multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study is needed to establish expert-based best practices and feasible guidelines for the safe and effective implementation of MI-E in the intensive care setting.

The term "low-resource setting" (LRS) is widely used in global health and critical care, yet no universally accepted definition exists. World Bank income classifications are frequently used as proxies for healthcare resources but may not adequately reflect differences in healthcare capacity and delivery within and across countries. Resource limitations may also exist within high-income countries, emphasizing the need for a multidimensional, setting-specific approach. The Consensus on Low-resource setting definition: An inteRnational Delphi sTudY (CLARITY-LRS) aims to achieve international expert consensus on the limitations of country-level income classifications and to develop a context-sensitive framework for defining and characterizing resource-limited acute and critical care settings. CLARITY-LRS is an international modified Delphi study involving 40-50 multidisciplinary panelists from all inhabited continents, with deliberate representation from low-resource settings and inclusion of patient and caregiver perspectives. At least three anonymous electronic Delphi rounds will be conducted using 9-point Likert scales, multiple-choice and ranking questions, and qualitative feedback. Consensus will be predefined as ≥80% agreement, with response stability assessed across consecutive rounds. The study will follow ACCORD guidance for consensus-based research. The resulting consensus is expected to identify key structural, organizational, workforce-related, technological, and clinical dimensions of resource limitations, provide an operational framework applicable across and within countries, and recommend standardized terminology, including whether the term "low-resource setting" should be retained or replaced. This framework may improve comparability of research, interpretation of evidence, and context-sensitive implementation of interventions across diverse healthcare systems.

The aim of this study is to develop international consensus-based recommendations for tracheostomy care in critically ill patients. Using the Delphi method, the study seeks to identify key practices in post-tracheostomy management, including tube downsizing and decannulation strategies, infection prevention and site care, restoration of communication and swallowing, and the recognition and management of tracheostomy-related complications. By engaging a multidisciplinary panel of international experts involved in tracheostomy care, the study aims to reduce variability in current practice and support the development of standardized, evidence-informed approaches across different clinical settings.

A surgical intervention might be highly variable amongst surgeons and centers. This variability has a potential relevance concerning clinical outcomes. For right-sided colon cancer, the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC) knows substantial variation. Especially since the surgical technique has been evolving during the latest decade with the introduction of intracorporeal anastomosis, a dissection technique within the correct embryological planes (complete mesocolic excision) and central vascular ligation of the segmental branches at its origin, resulting in an optimal lymph node dissection. Given the insights from recent studies showing the association between quality of surgery and relevant clinical outcomes, there is a great need for a formative quality assessment of LRHC. Detailed objective assessment of the LRHC is currently not performed in clinical practice nor in surgical training. Quality assessment of LRHC has great potential to improve surgical training and furthermore, implementation of a standardized technique will ultimately lead to better quality of care for patients suffering from right-sided colon cancer. The main objective of this study is to improve surgical outcomes for patient with right-sided colon cancer by a prospective sequential interventional cohort study that aims to standardize the surgical technique with subsequent controlled implementation after standardized review of the current practice in a nationwide multicenter setting. The primary endpoint is the 30-day morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.