Dental Pulp Necrosis

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical and radiographic success of calcium hydroxide-iodoform paste and modified triple antibiotic paste when used for the treatment of necrotic primary molars in children using the lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) technique. The study will include children aged 4-7 years with restorable necrotic mandibular second primary molars. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive LSTR treatment with either calcium hydroxide-iodoform paste or modified triple antibiotic paste. Clinical and radiographic findings will be assessed during follow-up over 12 months to determine the success of each treatment. The study hypothesis is that there will be a difference in the clinical and radiographic success between the two treatment materials when used with the LSTR technique

Achieving effective root canal disinfection while minimizing postoperative pain is a critical goal in endodontic therapy. Advanced irrigation protocols, such as ultrasonic activation, laser activation, negative pressure irrigation (PulpSucker device), and mechanical activation (Easy Clean device), have shown promise in enhancing bacterial reduction within the root canal system. However, their impact on postoperative pain has not been fully explored. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare bacterial reduction and postoperative pain levels in infected root canals using four different irrigation protocols. The study will use metagenomic analysis to evaluate changes in bacterial community composition and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess patient-reported pain levels at multiple time points postoperatively.

This randomized controlled trial will investigate if maintaining apical patency-a technique where a small file is gently moved past the root's end during cleaning-affects pain after a root canal. The study will include 48 adult patients needing root canal treatment on a back molar tooth with a dead nerve and infection at the root tip. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one where the apical patency technique is used, and one where it is not. All other treatment steps will be identical. Patients will record their pain levels on a standard scale (0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the procedure. The goal is to determine if this specific technique influences the intensity and duration of post-treatment pain

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which of three common root-canal rinsing (irrigation) methods removes bacteria most effectively in adult patients who need root-canal treatment. The main questions it will answer are: How much does a chitosan solution used alone lower the number of bacteria inside the root canal? Do the combinations sodium hypochlorite + chitosan or sodium hypochlorite + EDTA lower bacteria even more than chitosan alone? Researchers will compare the three irrigation methods to see which one achieves the greatest bacterial reduction. What participants will do Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1: Chitosan only Group 2: Sodium hypochlorite followed by chitosan Group 3: Sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA Attend two clinic visits: Visit 1: Receive standard root-canal treatment under local anesthesia. Provide tiny paper-point samples from inside the canal before and after the assigned rinse (painless; takes seconds). Visit 2 (about 1 week later): Return for a check-up and final filling of the tooth. Record any pain or discomfort for the first three days after treatment in a simple diary (or by phone). About 90 adults will take part. All procedures are routine in dental care, and there is no cost to participate. Participants may withdraw at any time and can ask the study dentist any questions throughout the trial.

The primary aim of the study is to compare the outcome of one vs two visits endodontics (root canal treatments) performed in general dental practice of infected (necrotic) teeth, one and four years after treatment. Secondary aims are to compare the root filling quality and the frequency of complications for both treatment modalities. A pilot study will identify the shortcomings of the protocol, which will be revised accordingly. A multi-center study in several clinics from five counties throughout Sweden is planned. Consecutive eligible patients (see inclusion and exclusion criteria) with one tooth each will be included. The study sample size calculation was based on a judgement that a minimal worthwhile effect of less than 10% was not clinically relevant. The presumption was that successful outcomes would be of 75% and 65% for the different treatment arms, respectively. Three hundred and fifty six patients per group are thus needed to detect that difference as statistical significant with a power of 80% and an alfa-error of 5%. To compensate for around 30% drop-outs a number of 1000 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomly enrolled in two arms: one in which the endodontic treatment (root canal treatment) is performed in one visit, and in the other arm in two visits. The allocation sequences for one vs multiple visit endodontics will be computer generated followed by a dark colored envelope concealed allocation. The patients will be contacted by telephone 5-7 days post-operatively, and a control visit at the clinic will be scheduled one month post-operatively to assess complications related to the treatment. A clinical control will be performed at the clinic one and four years after treatment. Intra-oral radiographs will be taken. The radiographs will be examined by two blinded and independent observers. A successful outcome is defined by clinical and radiographic normalcy. The statistical methods selected to analyse the primary outcome will be the Chi square test of 2x2 tables, or Fisher´s exact test when proportions are small and the expected value \<5. The calculations will be two-tailed. Results will be considered statistically significant at p\<0.05.